A Systematic Review of Communication Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illness
Effective communication is an interaction between two or more people that produces a desired effect and is a key element of quality of care for patients with advanced and serious illness and their family members. Suboptimal provider-patient/family communication is common, with negative effects on patient/family-centered outcomes.
To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of communication-related quality improvement interventions for patients with advanced and serious illness and to explore the effectiveness of consultative and integrative interventions.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and DARE from 2000 through December 2011 and reference list of eligible articles and reviews.
Study Eligibility Criteria, Participants And Interventions
Prospective, controlled quality improvement studies in populations with life-limiting or severe life-threatening illness with a primary intervention focus of improving communication with patients and/or families.
Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods
Two investigators independently screened and abstracted data on patient/family-centered outcomes.
We included 20 studies; 13 (65 %) were in intensive care. We found four intervention types: (1) family meetings with the usual team (11 studies, 77 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), (2) palliative care teams (5 studies, 50 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), (3) ethics consultation (2 studies, 100 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), and (4) physician-patient communication (2 studies, no significant improvement in healthcare utilization). Among studies addressing the outcomes of patient/family satisfaction, 22 % found improvement; among studies addressing healthcare utilization (e.g., length of stay), 73 % found improvement. Results suggest that consultative interventions, as opposed to integrative ones, may be more effective, but more research is needed.
Study heterogeneity did not allow quantitative synthesis.
Conclusions and Implications of Key Findings
Communication in the care of patients with advanced and serious illness can be improved using quality improvement interventions, particularly for healthcare utilization as an outcome. Interventions may be more effective using a consultative approach.
- Gattellari, M, Voigt, KJ, Butow, PN, Tattersall, MH (2002) When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?. J Clin Oncol 20: pp. 503-513 CrossRef
- Curtis, JR, Patrick, DL, Shannon, SE, Treece, PD, Engelberg, RA, Rubenfeld, GD (2001) The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med 29: pp. N26-N33 CrossRef
- Lorenz, KA, Lynn, J, Dy, SM (2008) Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 148: pp. 147-159
- Walling, A, Lorenz, KA, Dy, SM (2008) Evidence-based recommendations for information and care planning in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 26: pp. 3896-3902 CrossRef
- Scheunemann, LP, McDevitt, M, Carson, SS, Hanson, LC (2011) Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review. Chest 139: pp. 543-554 CrossRef
- Nelson, JE, Bassett, R, Boss, RD (2010) Models for structuring a clinical initiative to enhance palliative care in the intensive care unit: a report from the IPAL-ICU Project (Improving Palliative Care in the ICU). Crit Care Med 38: pp. 1765-1772 CrossRef
- National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care (NCP). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, Second Edition; 2009.
- Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: AHRQ Publication No. 10(11)-EHC063-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2011. [Cited 2012 Jul 25]. Available at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/MethodsGuide_Prepublication-Draft_20120523.pdf.
- Atkins D, Chang S, Gartlehner G et al. Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2010. Chapter 6 of Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC019-EF. [Cited 2012 July 25]. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/tasks/sites/ehc/assets/File/Methods_Guide_Atkins.pdf.
- Dy SM, Aslakson RA, Wilson RF et al. Interventions to Improve Health Care and Palliative Care for Advanced and Serious Illness. Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science. Evidence Report No. 208. (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract. No. Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12-E014-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. October 2012. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
- Ahrens, T, Yancey, V, Kollef, M (2003) Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care 12: pp. 317-323
- Campbell, ML, Guzman, JA (2003) Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU. Chest 123: pp. 266-271 CrossRef
- Clayton, JM, Butow, PN, Tattersall, MH (2007) Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol 25: pp. 715-723 CrossRef
- Cowan JD, Burns D, Palmer TW, Scott J, Feeback E. A palliative medicine program in a community setting: 12 points from the first 12 months. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20(6).
- Gade, G, Venohr, I, Conner, D (2008) Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Med 11: pp. 180-190 CrossRef
- Hanks, GW, Robbins, M, Sharp, D (2002) The IMPACT study: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a hospital palliative care team. Br J Cancer 87: pp. 733-739 CrossRef
- Juliet, J, Ellen, R, Jackson, VA, Meigs, JB, Andrew, BJ (2011) Development of a cognitive model for advance care planning discussions: results from a quality improvement initiative. J Palliat Med 14: pp. 331-336 CrossRef
- Kaufer, M, Murphy, P, Barker, K, Mosenthal, A (2008) Family satisfaction following the death of a loved one in an inner city MICU. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 25: pp. 318-325 CrossRef
- Lautrette, A, Darmon, M, Megarbane, B (2007) A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 356: pp. 469-478 CrossRef
- Lilly, CM, Meo, DL, Sonna, LA (2000) An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 109: pp. 469-475 CrossRef
- Lilly, CM, Sonna, LA, Haley, KJ, Massaro, AF (2003) Intensive communication: four-year follow-up from a clinical practice study. Crit Care Med 31: pp. S394-S399 CrossRef
- Molloy, DW, Guyatt, GH, Russo, R (2000) Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 283: pp. 1437-1444 CrossRef
- Mosenthal, AC, Murphy, PA, Barker, LK, Lavery, R, Retano, A, Livingston, DH (2008) Changing the culture around end-of-life care in the trauma intensive care unit. J Trauma 64: pp. 1587-1593 CrossRef
- Muir, JC, Daly, F, Davis, MS (2010) Integrating palliative care into outpatient private practice oncology setting. J Pain Symptom Manag 40: pp. 126-135 CrossRef
- Norton, SA, Hogan, LA, Holloway, RG, Temkin-Greener, H, Buckley, MJ, Quill, TE (2007) Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 35: pp. 1530-1535 CrossRef
- Penticuff, JH, Arheart, KL (2005) Effectiveness of an intervention to improve parent-professional collaboration in neonatal intensive care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 19: pp. 187-202
- Sampson, EL, Jones, L, Thuné-Boyle, IC (2011) Palliative assessment and advance care planning in severe dementia: an exploratory randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention. Palliat Med 25: pp. 197-209 CrossRef
- Schneiderman, LJ, Gilmer, T, Teetzel, HD (2000) Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 28: pp. 3920-3924 CrossRef
- Schneiderman, LJ, Gilmer, T, Teetzel, HD (2003) Effect of ethics consultations on non-beneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290: pp. 1166-1172 CrossRef
- Tulsky, JA, Arnold, RM, Alexander, SC (2011) Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 155: pp. 593-601
- Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR. Ethics consultation in health care. Health Administration Press; 1989 ISBN 0910701393.
- Fenton, JJ, Jerant, AF, Bertakis, KD, Franks, P (2012) The cost of satisfaction. A national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med 172: pp. 405-411 CrossRef
- Epstein, RM, Alper, BS, Quill, TE (2004) Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA 291: pp. 2359-2366 CrossRef
- A Systematic Review of Communication Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illness
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 4 , pp 570-577
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- seriously ill patients
- patients with advanced diseases
- quality improvement interventions
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center, 1830 East Monument Street, Room 8065, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- 2. Department of Health Policy & Management, Oncology, and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Hampton House, Room 609, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 3. Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hampton House, Room 648, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 4. Evidence-Based Practice Center, Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Room 8065, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- 5. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 6. Duffey Pain and Palliative Care Program, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- 8. Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hampton House, Room 680A, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 9. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Meyer 297A, Baltimore, MD, 21287-7294, USA