Improving the Informed Consent Process for Research Subjects with Low Literacy: A Systematic Review
- Leonardo TamarizAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of MiamiVeterans Affairs Medical Center Email author
- , Ana PalacioAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of MiamiVeterans Affairs Medical Center
- , Mauricio RobertAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami
- , Erin N. MarcusAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of MiamiSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Inadequate health literacy may impair research subjects’ ability to participate adequately in the informed consent (IC) process. Our aim is to evaluate the evidence supporting interventions, to improve comprehension of the IC process in low literacy subjects.
We performed a MEDLINE database search (1966 to November 2011) supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. We selected all studies in which a modification of the IC was tested to improve comprehension in low literacy populations. Study design, quality criteria, population, interventions and outcomes for each trial were extracted. The main outcome evaluated was comprehension, measured using a written test or verbal comprehension.
Our search strategy yielded 281 studies, of which only six met our eligibility criteria. The six studies included 1620 research participants. The studies predominantly included populations that were older (median age 61, range 48–64), ethnic minority, and with literacy level of 8th grade or below. Only one study had a randomized design. The specific intervention differed in each study. Two of the studies included the teach-back method or teach to goal method and achieved the highest level of comprehension. Two studies changed the readability level of the IC and resulted in the lowest comprehension among study subjects.
The evidence supporting interventions to improve the informed consent process in low literacy populations is extremely limited. Among the interventions evaluated, having a study team member spend more time talking one-on-one to study participants was the most effective strategy for improving informed consent understanding; however, this finding is based on the results of a single study.
KEY WORDSinformed consent health literacy comprehension
- Improving the Informed Consent Process for Research Subjects with Low Literacy: A Systematic Review
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 1 , pp 121-126
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- informed consent
- health literacy
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St, Suite 971 (H-201), Miami, FL, 33136, USA
- 2. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
- 3. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA