Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Interventions for Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review
To systematically review the literature to determine which interventions improve the screening, diagnosis or treatment of cervical cancer for racial and/or ethnic minorities.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS
We searched the above databases for original articles published in English with at least one intervention designed to improve cervical cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis or treatment that linked participants to the healthcare system; that focused on US racial and/or ethnic minority populations; and that measured health outcomes. Articles were reviewed to determine the population, intervention(s), and outcomes. Articles published through August 2010 were included.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
One author rated the methodological quality of each of the included articles. The strength of evidence was assessed using the criteria developed by the GRADE Working Group.45,46
Thirty-one studies were included. The strength of evidence is moderate that telephone support with navigation increases the rate of screening for cervical cancer in Spanish- and English-speaking populations; low that education delivered by lay health educators with navigation increases the rate of screening for cervical cancer for Latinas, Chinese Americans and Vietnamese Americans; low that a single visit for screening for cervical cancer and follow up of an abnormal result improves the diagnosis and treatment of premalignant disease of the cervix for Latinas; and low that telephone counseling increases the diagnosis and treatment of premalignant lesions of the cervix for African Americans.
Studies that did not focus on racial and/or ethnic minority populations may have been excluded. In addition, this review excluded interventions that did not link racial and ethnic minorities to the health care system. While inclusion of these studies may have altered our findings, they were outside the scope of our review.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS
Patient navigation with telephone support or education may be effective at improving screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minorities. Research is needed to determine the applicability of the findings beyond the populations studied.
- Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. SEER Stat Fact Sheet: Cervix Uteri. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed March 8, 2012.
- U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2010.
- Freeman HP, Wingrove BK. Excess Cervical Cancer Mortality: A Marker for Low Access to Health Care in Poor Communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, May 2005. NIH Pub. No. 05–5282.
- Jemal A, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:30–40. CrossRef
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures for Hispanics 2006–8. American Cancer Society 2006.
- Howe HL, Wu X, Rus LA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2003, featuring cancer among US Hispanic/Latino populations. Cancer. 2006;107(8):1711–42. CrossRef
- Walbloomers JMM. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12–19. CrossRef
- Brawley O. Some perspective on black-white cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:322–5. CrossRef
- Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384. CrossRef
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed March 8, 2012.
- Chin MH, Walters AE, Cook SC, Huang ES. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change Systematic Review Leadership Team Health Disparities. Medical Care Research and Review: Special Supplemental Issue. 2007;64(5) supplement.
- Yancey AK, Walden L. Stimulating cancer screening among Latinas and African-American women. A community case study. J Canc Educ. 1994;9(1):46–52. CrossRef
- Beach ML, Flood AB, Robinson CM, Cassells AN, Tobin JN, Greene MA, et al. Can language-concordant prevention care managers improve cancer screening rates? Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(10):2058–64. CrossRef
- Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, Robinson CM, Greene MA, Sox CH, et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):563–71.
- Taylor VM, Hislop TG, Jackson JC, Tu S-P, Yasui Y, Schwartz SM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote cervical cancer screening among Chinese women in North America. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(9):670–7. CrossRef
- Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Dell J, Chen E, Phillips CW. An intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income African-American women. Fam Community Health. 1994;17(1):56–63.
- Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, Thomas L, Chauhan P, Matseoane S, et al. A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8(4):173–8. CrossRef
- Bastani R, Berman BA, Belin TR, Crane LA, Marcus AC, Nasseri K, et al. Increasing cervical cancer screening among underserved women in a large urban county health system: can it be done? What does it take? Med Care. 2002;40(10):891–907. CrossRef
- Nguyen BH, Nguyen K, McPhee SJ, Nguyen AT, Tran DQ, Jenkins CNH. Promoting cancer prevention activities among Vietnamese physicians in California. J Canc Educ. 2000;15(2):82–5.
- Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, Glassman B, Yarnall KS, Lipkus I, et al. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37(2):125–40. CrossRef
- Gotay CC, Banner RO, Matsunaga DS, Hedlund N, Enos R, Issell BF, et al. Impact of a culturally appropriate intervention on breast and cervical screening among native Hawaiian women. Prev Med. 2000;31(5):529–37. CrossRef
- Mock J, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, Wong C, Doan H, Lai KQ, et al. Effective lay health worker outreach and media-based education for promoting cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese American women. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(9):1693–700. CrossRef
- Wang X, Fang C, Tan Y, Liu A, Ma GX. Evidence-based intervention to reduce access barriers to cervical cancer screening among underserved Chinese American women. J Wom Health. 2010;19(3):463–9. 15409996. CrossRef
- Michielutte R, Dignan M, Bahnson J, Wells HB. The Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project–II. Compliance with screening follow-up of abnormal cervical smears. Health Educ Res. 1994;9(4):421–32. CrossRef
- Paskett ED, Tatum CM, D'Agostino R Jr, Rushing J, Velez R, Michielutte R, et al. Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8(5):453–9.
- Foster JD, Holland B, Louria DB, Stinson L. In situ/invasive cervical cancer ratios: impact of cancer education and screening. J Canc Educ. 1988;3(2):121–5. CrossRef
- Lerman C, Hanjani P, Caputo C, Miller S, Delmoor E, Nolte S, et al. Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(2):330–3.
- Miller SM, Siejak KK, Schroeder CM, Lerman C, Hernandez E, Helm CW. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(10):703–8. CrossRef
- Brewster WR, Hubbell FA, Largent J, Ziogas A, Lin F, Howe S, et al. Feasibility of management of high-grade cervical lesions in a single visit: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2005;294(17):2182–7. CrossRef
- Marcus AC, Kaplan CP, Crane LA, Berek JS, Bernstein G, Gunning JE, et al. Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care. 1998;36(3):397–410. CrossRef
- Marcus AC, Crane LA, Kaplan CP, Reading AE, Savage E, Gunning J, et al. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies. Med Care. 1992;30(3):216–30. CrossRef
- Jibaja–Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Smith QW, Holcomb JD, Kingery P. Differential effects of messages for breast and cervical cancer screening. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16(1):42–52. CrossRef
- Rivers SE, Salovey P, Pizarro DA, Pizarro J, Schneider TR. Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. J Heal Psychol. 2005;10(1):65–77. CrossRef
- Margolis KL, Lurie N, McGovern PG, Tyrrell M, Slater JS. Increasing breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income women. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(8):515–21. CrossRef
- Jandorf L, Bursac Z, Pulley L, Trevino M, Castillo A, Erwin DO. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008;2(3):195–204. CrossRef
- Fernandez ME, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G, Williams J, Saavedra-Embesi M, Chan W, et al. Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(5):936–43. CrossRef
- Thompson B, Coronado G, Chen L, Islas I. Celebremos la salud! a community randomized trial of cancer prevention (United States). Canc Causes Contr. 2006;17(5):733–46. CrossRef
- Sox CH, Dietrich AJ, Goldman DC, Provost EM. Improved access to women's health services for Alaska natives through community health aide training. J Community Health. 1999;24(4):313–23. CrossRef
- Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley LV, Weiss NS, Goldman D, Simpson DM. Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13(6):411–7.
- Jibaja–Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Kingery P, Smith QW, Holcomb JD. Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50(2):123–32. CrossRef
- Ornstein SM, Garr DR, Jenkins RG, Rust PF, Arnon A. Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(1):82–90.
- Lantz PM, Soliman S. An evaluation of a Medicaid expansion for cancer care: the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000. Wom Health Issues. 2009;19(4):221–31. CrossRef
- Peek ME, Cargill A, Huang ES. Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:101S–156S. CrossRef
- Chin MH, Clarke AR, Nocon RS, Casey AA, Goddu AP, Keesecker NM, Cook SC. A Roadmap and Best Practices for Organizations to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2082-9.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–926
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. GRADE: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008;336:995–998.
- Carmichael JA, Jeffrey JF, Steele HD, Ohlke ID. The cytologic history of 245 patients developing invasive cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(5):685–90.
- Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, Lowell DM, Meigs JW, Merino MJ, Flannery JT, Polednak AP. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(6):791–4. CrossRef
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Surveillance of Screening-Detected Cancers (Colon and Rectum, Breast, and Cervix) — United States, 2004–2006]. MMWR 2010; 59(No. SS-9): 2.
- Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Interventions for Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 8 , pp 1016-1032
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- cervical cancer
- minority health
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
- 2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change National Program Office, Chicago, IL, USA
- 3. Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA