Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 1243–1250

Impact of Automated Alerts on Follow-Up of Post-Discharge Microbiology Results: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

    • Division of Biomedical InformaticsUniversity of California San Diego
    • Division of Hospital MedicineUniversity of California San Diego
  • Christopher Roy
    • Division of General MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital
    • Hospitalist ServiceBrigham and Women’s Hospital
    • Harvard Medical School
  • Deborah H. Williams
    • Division of General MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Eric G. Poon
    • Division of General MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital
    • Information SystemsPartners Healthcare
    • Harvard Medical School
Original Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8

Cite this article as:
El-Kareh, R., Roy, C., Williams, D.H. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2012) 27: 1243. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Failure to follow up microbiology results pending at the time of hospital discharge can delay diagnosis and treatment of important infections, harm patients, and increase the risk of litigation. Current systems to track pending tests are often inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

To design, implement, and evaluate an automated system to improve follow-up of microbiology results that return after hospitalized patients are discharged.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial.

SUBJECTS

Inpatient and outpatient physicians caring for adult patients hospitalized at a large academic hospital from February 2009 to June 2010 with positive and untreated or undertreated blood, urine, sputum, or cerebral spinal fluid cultures returning post-discharge.

INTERVENTION

An automated e-mail-based system alerting inpatient and outpatient physicians to positive post-discharge culture results not adequately treated with an antibiotic at the time of discharge.

MAIN MEASURES

Our primary outcome was documented follow-up of results within 3 days. Secondary outcomes included physician awareness and assessment of result urgency, impact on clinical assessments and plans, and preferred alerting scenarios.

KEY RESULTS

We evaluated the follow-up of 157 post-discharge microbiology results from patients of 121 physicians. We found documented follow-up in 27/97 (28%) results in the intervention group and 8/60 (13%) in the control group [aOR 3.2, (95% CI 1.3-8.4); p = 0.01]. Of all inpatient physician respondents, 32/82 (39%) were previously aware of the results, 45/77 (58%) felt the results changed their assessments and plans, 43/77 (56%) felt the results required urgent action, and 67/70 (96%) preferred alerts for current or broader scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Our alerting system improved the proportion of important post-discharge microbiology results with documented follow-up, though the proportion remained low. The alerts were well received and may be expanded in the future.

KEY WORDS

reminder systemspending test resultstransitions of caretest result managementdelays in diagnosis

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2012