Blood Pressure Monitoring Technique Impacts Hypertension Treatment
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In 2005 the American Heart Association (AHA) released updated recommendations for blood pressure (BP) monitoring in order to ensure accurate BP measurements.
To determine if current methods of BP assessment in an ambulatory clinic result in significantly different BP measurements than those obtained by following the AHA recommendations and if these BP differences impact treatment decisions.
Randomized prospective analysis.
University of New Mexico Hospital Adult Internal Medicine clinic.
Forty adults with hypertension
Patient BPs were measured using both the traditional triage method and the AHA-recommended method in cross-over fashion in random order. Two complete medical profile summaries were then constructed for each patient: one for each BP measurement obtained by each technique. These profiles were then reviewed by a panel of providers who provided hypothetical hypertension treatment recommendations.
Individual BP results varied greatly between the two methods. SBP readings differed by ≥5 mmHg in either direction for 68% of patients while 78% of patient’s DBP readings differed by ≥2 mmHg in either direction. Overall, 93% of patients had a BP difference of either ≥5 mmHg systolic or ≥2 mmHg diastolic. Five patients were determined to be at goal with the triage method, but were higher than their goal BP with the AHA method Significant differences were also seen in treatment recommendations for a given patient based on the differences seen between the two obtained BP readings. The number of patients with treatment variations between their two profiles ranged from 13% to 23% depending on the reviewing provider (p < 0.01 for all providers).
Inaccurate BP assessment is common and may impact hypertension treatment decisions.
- Chobanian, AV, Bakris, GL, Black, HR (2003) Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 42: pp. 1206-1252 CrossRef
- Thom, T, Haase, N, Rosamond, W (2006) Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2006 update. A report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 113: pp. e85-e151 CrossRef
- Manning, DM, Kuchirka, C, Kaminski, J (1983) Miscuffing: inappropriate blood pressure cuff application. Circulation 68: pp. 763-766 CrossRef
- Fonseca-Reyes, S, Garcia de Alba-Garcia, J, Parra-Carrillo, JZ, Paczka-Zapata, JA (2003) Effect of standard cuff on blood pressure readings in patients with obese arms. How frequent are arms of a large circumference. Blood Press Monit 8: pp. 101-106 CrossRef
- Pickering, TG, Hall, JE, Appel, LJ (2005) Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans. A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Circulation 111: pp. 697-716 CrossRef
- Webster, J, Newnham, D, Petrie, JC, Lovell, HG (1984) Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure. Br Med J 288: pp. 1574-1575 CrossRef
- Mourad, A, Carney, S, Gillies, A, Jones, B, Nanra, R, Trevillian, P (2003) Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?. J Hum Hypertens 17: pp. 389-395 CrossRef
- Lane, D, Beevers, M, Barnes, N (2002) Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant?. J Hypertens 20: pp. 1089-1095 CrossRef
- Pinar, R, Sabuncu, N, Oksay, A (2004) Effects of crossed leg on blood pressure. Blood Press 13: pp. 252-254 CrossRef
- Chiolero, A, Gervasoni, JP, Rwebogora, A, Balampama, M, Paccaud, F, Bovet, P (2006) Difference in blood pressure readings with mercury and automated devices: impact on hypertension prevalence estimates in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eur J Epidemiol 21: pp. 427-433 CrossRef
- Campbell, NRC, Culleton, BW, McKay, DW (2005) Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurements in ambulatory physician practices. Am J Hypertens 18: pp. 1522-1527 CrossRef
- Kim, JW, Bosworth, HB, Voils, CI (2005) Brief report: How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard?. J Gen Intern Med 20: pp. 647-649 CrossRef
- Verdecchia, P, Staessen, JA, Angeli, F (2009) Usual versus tight control of SBP in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomized trial. Lancet 374: pp. 525-533 CrossRef
- Whelton, PK, He, J, Appel, LJ (2002) Primary prevention of hypertension clinical and public health advisory from the national high blood pressure education program. JAMA 288: pp. 1882-1888 CrossRef
- Cook, NR, Cohen, J, Herbert, PR, Taylor, JO, Hennekens, CH (1995) Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med 155: pp. 701-709 CrossRef
- Turner, MJ, Baker, AB, Kam, PC (2004) Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension. Blood Press Monit 9: pp. 249-253 CrossRef
- Blood Pressure Monitoring Technique Impacts Hypertension Treatment
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 6 , pp 623-629
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- blood pressure measurement
- Industry Sectors