The Relationship Between Time Spent Communicating and Communication Outcomes on a Hospital Medicine Service
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Quality care depends on effective communication between caregivers, but it is unknown whether time spent communicating is associated with communication outcomes.
To assess the association between time spent communicating, agreement on plan of care, and patient satisfaction.
Time-motion study with cross-sectional survey.
Academic medical center.
Physicians, patients, and nurses on a hospital medicine service.
Hospitalists’ forms of communication were timed with a stopwatch. Physician–nurse agreement on the plan of care and patient satisfaction with physician communication were assessed via survey.
Eighteen hospitalists were observed caring for 379 patients. On average, physicians spent more time per patient on written than verbal communication (median: 9.2 min. vs. 6.3 min, p < 0.001). Verbal communication was greatest with patients (mean time 5.3 min, range 0–37 min), then other physicians (1.4 min), families (1.1 min), nurses (1.1 min), and case managers (0.4 min). There was no verbal communication with nurses in 30% of cases. Nurses and physicians agreed most about planned procedures (87%), principal diagnosis (74%), tests ordered (73%), anticipated discharge date (69%) and least regarding medication changes (59%). There was no association between time spent communicating and agreement on plan of care. Among 123 patients who completed surveys (response rate 32%), time physicians spent talking to patients was not correlated with patients’ satisfaction with physician communication (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.09, p = 0.30).
Hospitalists vary in the amount of time they spend communicating, but we found no association between time spent and either patient satisfaction or nurse-physician agreement on plan of care.
- O’Leary, KJ, Liebovitz, DM, Baker, DW (2006) How hospitalists spend their time: insights on efficiency and safety. J Hosp Med 1: pp. 88-93 CrossRef
- Kim, CS, Lovejoy, W, Paulsen, M, Chang, R, Flanders, SA (2010) Hospitalist time usage and cyclicality: opportunities to improve efficiency. J Hosp Med 5: pp. 329-334 CrossRef
- Tipping, MD, Forth, VE, O’Leary, KJ (2010) Where did the day go?–a time-motion study of hospitalists. J Hosp Med 5: pp. 323-328 CrossRef
- Westbrook, JI, Ampt, A, Kearney, L, Rob, MI (2008) All in a day’s work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time. Med J Aust 188: pp. 506-509
- Weigl, M, Muller, A, Zupanc, A, Angerer, P (2009) Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians. BMC Health Serv Res 9: pp. 110 CrossRef
- Becker, G, Kempf, DE, Xander, CJ, Momm, F, Olschewski, M, Blum, HE (2010) Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 10: pp. 94 CrossRef
- O’Leary, KJ, Thompson, JA, Landler, MP (2010) Patterns of nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care. Qual Saf Health Care 19: pp. 195-199 CrossRef
- O’Leary, KJ, Kulkarni, N, Landler, MP (2010) Hospitalized patients’ understanding of their plan of care. Mayo Clin Proc 85: pp. 47-52 CrossRef
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCAHPS Survey. Available at: http://www.hcahpsonline.org/Files/V5%200%20Appendix%20A%20-%20HCAHPS%20Mail%20Survey%20Materials%20(English).pdf. Accessed August 16, 2011.
- O’Leary, KJ, Wayne, DB, Landler, MP (2009) Impact of localizing physicians to hospital units on nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care. J Gen Intern Med 24: pp. 1223-1227 CrossRef
- Most say doctors should talk to each other. United Press International. Available at http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2010/04/12/Most-say-doctors-should-talk-to-each-other/UPI-49701271048173/. Accessed April 12, 2010.
- Edwards, A, Fitzpatrick, LA, Augustine, S (2009) Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. Int J Med Inform 78: pp. 629-637 CrossRef
- Kim, MM, Barnato, AE, Angus, DC, Fleisher, LA, Kahn, JM (2010) The effect of multidisciplinary care teams on intensive care unit mortality. Arch Intern Med 170: pp. 369-376 CrossRef
- Vazirani, S, Hays, RD, Shapiro, MF, Cowan, M (2005) Effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on communication and collaboration among physicians and nurses. Am J Crit Care 14: pp. 71-77
- O’Leary KJ, Haviley C, Slade ME, Shah HM, Lee J, Williams MV. Improving teamwork: impact of structured interdisciplinary rounds on a hospitalist unit. J Hosp Med. Jul 13 2010.
- O’Mahony, S, Mazur, E, Charney, P, Wang, Y, Fine, J (2007) Use of multidisciplinary rounds to simultaneously improve quality outcomes, enhance resident education, and shorten length of stay. J Gen Intern Med 22: pp. 1073-1079 CrossRef
- The Relationship Between Time Spent Communicating and Communication Outcomes on a Hospital Medicine Service
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 2 , pp 185-189
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- hospital medicine
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Quality of Care Research, Springfield, MA, USA
- 2. Division of General Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
- 3. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- 5. Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA
- 4. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA