A Multiple Choice Testing Program Coupled with a Year-long Elective Experience is Associated with Improved Performance on the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The Internal Medicine In-Training Exam (IM-ITE) assesses the content knowledge of internal medicine trainees. Many programs use the IM-ITE to counsel residents, to create individual remediation plans, and to make fundamental programmatic and curricular modifications.
To assess the association between a multiple-choice testing program administered during 12 consecutive months of ambulatory and inpatient elective experience and IM-ITE percentile scores in third post-graduate year (PGY-3) categorical residents.
Retrospective cohort study.
One hundred and four categorical internal medicine residents. Forty-five residents in the 2008 and 2009 classes participated in the study group, and the 59 residents in the three classes that preceded the use of the testing program, 2005–2007, served as controls.
A comprehensive, elective rotation specific, multiple-choice testing program and a separate board review program, both administered during a continuous long-block elective experience during the twelve months between the second post-graduate year (PGY-2) and PGY-3 in-training examinations.
We analyzed the change in median individual percent correct and percentile scores between the PGY-1 and PGY-2 IM-ITE and between the PGY-2 and PGY-3 IM-ITE in both control and study cohorts. For our main outcome measure, we compared the change in median individual percentile rank between the control and study cohorts between the PGY-2 and the PGY-3 IM-ITE testing opportunities.
After experiencing the educational intervention, the study group demonstrated a significant increase in median individual IM-ITE percentile score between PGY-2 and PGY-3 examinations of 8.5 percentile points (p < 0.01). This is significantly better than the increase of 1.0 percentile point seen in the control group between its PGY-2 and PGY-3 examination (p < 0.01).
A comprehensive multiple-choice testing program aimed at PGY-2 residents during a 12-month continuous long-block elective experience is associated with improved PGY-3 IM-ITE performance.
- The American College of Physicians. Internal Medicine In-Training Examination. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/education_recertification/education/in_training/#3 Accessed March 3, 2011.
- Grossman RS, Fincher RE, Layne RD, Seelig CB, Berkowitz LR, Levine MA. Validity of the In-Training exam for predicting American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination scores. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:63–67. CrossRef
- Waxman H, Braunstein G, Dantzker D, et al. Performance on the internal medicine second-year In-training examination predicts the outcome of the ABIM certifying exam. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:692–694. CrossRef
- Rollins LK, Martindale JR, Edmond M, Manser T, Scheld WM. Predicting pass rates on the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:414–416. CrossRef
- Babbott SF, Beasley BW, Hinchey KT, Blotzer JW, Holmboe ES. The predictive validity of the Internal Medicine In-training Examination. Am J Med. 2007;120(8):735–740. CrossRef
- Holmboe E, Wang Y, Meehan T, et al. Association between maintenance of certification examination scores and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1396–1403. CrossRef
- Norcini J, Lipner R, Kimball H. Certifying examination performance and patient outcomes following acute myocardial infarction. Med Educ. 2002;36(9):853–859. CrossRef
- Sharp L, Bashook P, Lipsky M, Horowitz S, Miller S. Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link. Acad Med. 2002;77:534–542. CrossRef
- Garibaldi RA, Subhiyah R, Moore ME, Waxman H. The In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine: an analysis of resident performance over time. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:505–510.
- Webb TP, Weigelt JA, Redlich PN, Anderson RC, Brasel KJ, Simpson D. Protected block curriculum enhances learning during general surgery residency training. Arch Surg. 2009;144(2):160–166. CrossRef
- McDonald FS, Zeger SL, Kolars JC. Factors associated with medical knowledge acquisition during internal medicine residency. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:962–968. CrossRef
- McDonald FS, Zeger SL, Kolars JC. Associations of conference attendance with Internal Medicine In-Training Examination Scores. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(4):449–453. CrossRef
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Educational Innovations Project. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_140/140_EIPindex.asp. Accessed March 3, 2011.
- Warm EJ, Schauer DP, Diers T, et al. The Ambulatory Long-Block: An Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP). J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):921–6. CrossRef
- Warm EJ, Schauer DP, Revis B, Boex JR. Multi-source feedback in the ambulatory setting. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(2):269–277.
- A Multiple Choice Testing Program Coupled with a Year-long Elective Experience is Associated with Improved Performance on the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 11 , pp 1253-1257
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Internal Medicine In-Training Exam
- multiple-choice testing
- medical knowledge
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267–0535, USA
- 2. American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA