Improving the Follow-Up of Positive Hemoccult Screening Tests: An Electronic Intervention
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Four population-based studies of screening for CRC with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) have shown that mortality can be significantly reduced. However, nearly half of all positive screening tests are not appropriately evaluated.
We evaluated whether an electronic record intervention improved the follow-up of patients with a positive FOBT (FOBT+) result.
We conducted a cluster randomized trial involving four Veteran’s Affairs (VA) medical centers pair-matched by colonoscopy volume and randomized within the pair to receive the electronic intervention or usual care.
All patients with FOBT+ results at participating facilities during a matched pre- and post-intervention time period.
In the two intervention sites, an electronic consult that imported relevant clinical information was automatically submitted to the gastroenterology (GI) clinic for all FOBT+ patients at the time the result was recorded in the laboratory. In both intervention and control sites (usual care), PCPs continued to be notified of FOBT+ results in the usual manner
Pre- and post-intervention changes in the proportion of FOBT+ patients having: (1) a GI consult or (2) a GI consult plus complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE) of the colon within 30, 90 and 180 days were compared across intervention and control sites. Log rank tests were used to determine statistical significance.
The 30-, 90- and 180-day GI consult rates improved 21–33 % (p < 0.001) among intervention sites, but did not change in the usual care sites. Thirty-, 90- and 180-day CDE rates improved 9–31% (p < 0.03) in intervention sites, but did not significantly change in the usual care sites. Time to GI consult and CDE decreased significantly over time in the intervention sites (p < 0.001), but remained unchanged in the usual care sites.
The relatively simple electronic intervention evaluated can significantly improve the follow-up of FOBT+ results. Interventions such as this could improve patient care and may be applicable to other practice settings, as well as other types of tests.
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul-Aug 2009;59(4):225-249. CrossRef
- Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. May 2008;134(5):1570-1595. CrossRef
- Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. May 13 1993;328(19):1365-1371. CrossRef
- Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. Nov 30 1996;348(9040):1472-1477. CrossRef
- Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. Nov 30 1996;348(9040):1467-1471. CrossRef
- Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Gut. Jan 2002;50(1):29-32. CrossRef
- Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, et al. Reduction in colorectal cancer mortality by fecal occult blood screening in a French controlled study. Gastroenterology. Jun 2004;126(7):1674-1680. CrossRef
- Lurie JD, Welch HG. Diagnostic testing following fecal occult blood screening in the elderly. J Natl Cancer Inst. Oct 6 1999;91(19):1641-1646. CrossRef
- Fisher DA, Jeffreys A, Coffman CJ, et al. Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Jun 2006;15(6):1232-1235. CrossRef
- Rao SK, Schilling TF, Sequist TD. Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests. J Gen Intern Med. Mar 2009;24(3):356-360. CrossRef
- Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Bradford SC, et al. Improvement in the diagnostic evaluation of a positive fecal occult blood test in an integrated health care organization. Med Care. Sep 2008;46(9 Suppl 1):S91-96. CrossRef
- Singh H, Daci K, Petersen LA, et al. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 2009;104(10):2543-2554. CrossRef
- Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D, et al. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. Apr 2004;38(4):375-381. CrossRef
- Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. Jul 2006;49(7):1002-1010. CrossRef
- Meza JP, Webster DS. Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. Am J Manag Care. Dec 2000;6(12):1297-1300.
- Murff HJ, Patel VL, Hripcsak G, Bates DW. Detecting adverse events for patient safety research: a review of current methodologies. J Biomed Inform. Feb-Apr 2003;36(1-2):131-143. CrossRef
- Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Uman JE, McCarthy BD. Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. Arch Intern Med. Feb 12 1996;156(3):327-331. CrossRef
- 20 Tips to Help Prevent Medical Errors. Patient Fact Sheet. AHRQ Publication No. 00-PO38, February 2000. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/20tips.htm. Accessed January 10, 2011.
- Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, Bates DW, Kuperman GJ. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient results manager. J Biomed Inform. Feb-Apr 2003;36(1-2):80-91. CrossRef
- Baron RJ. What’s keeping us so busy in primary care? A snapshot from one practice. N Engl J Med. Apr 29 2010;362(17):1632-1636. CrossRef
- Kravitz RL, Rolph JE, Petersen L. Omission-related malpractice claims and the limits of defensive medicine. Med Care Res Rev. Dec 1997;54(4):456-471. CrossRef
- McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. N Engl J Med. Dec 9 1976;295(24):1351-1355. CrossRef
- Improving the Follow-Up of Positive Hemoccult Screening Tests: An Electronic Intervention
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 7 , pp 691-697
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- colorectal cancer
- cancer screening
- cancer prevention
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mail code P-3-Med, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- 2. Department of Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, The Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- 3. Department of Medicine, The Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- 4. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, The Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- 5. The Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- 6. Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Center, The Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA