Barriers to Follow-Up of an Abnormal Pap Smear in Latina Women Referred for Colposcopy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Lower rates of follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear in racial and ethnic minorities may contribute to the higher incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer seen in these groups.
To identify patient-perceived barriers to follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear result among Latina women.
DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACH
Qualitative, semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted with patients from an academic hospital-affiliated urban community health center. Three groups of women were interviewed: new colposcopy clinic patients, patients who had previous colposcopies and patients enrolled in the health center's patient navigator program. Open-ended questions explored their knowledge, beliefs and experiences with colposcopy. Content analysis of transcripts was performed using established qualitative techinques.
Of 40 Latina women recruited, 75% spoke only Spanish. The average age was 31.5 (range 18–55). Personal and system barriers identified were categorized into four themes: (1) anxiety/fear of procedure and diagnosis; (2) scheduling/availability of appointments interfering with work and/or child care; (3) inadequate communication about appointments, including lack of explanation regarding diagnosis, procedure and results; and (4) pain. New patients more commonly reported problems with scheduling and communication. Follow-up patients were more concerned about pain, and navigated women most often reported fear of results but had fewer concerns about inadequate communication.
Anxiety/fear was the most common personal barrier, while difficulty scheduling appointments and inadequate communication were the major systems barriers identified in these Latina women. Interventions to lower these barriers to colposcopy among Latina women may increase adherence to follow-up of abnormal Pap smears.
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006-Table 1.1, Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths for 2009. Website Accessed June 2010 [cited June 25, 2010]; Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/results_single/sect_01_table.01.pdf.
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006-Cancer of the Cervix Uteri (invasive), Table 5.10 (p. 11). Website accessed June 2010 [cited June 25, 2010]; Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/results_merged/sect_05_cervix_uteri.pdf Note: Incidence and mortality rates are age-adjusted per 100,000 women per year, based on cases diagnosed (incidence) or patients who died (mortality) in 2002-2006.
- Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Das IP, Cordray ST, Luchok KJ. Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal Pap tests. J Women’s Health (Larchmt). 2007;16(3):311–30. CrossRef
- Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(6):791–4. CrossRef
- Downs LS, Smith JS, Scarinci I, Flowers L, Parham G. The disparity of cervical cancer in diverse populations. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2 Suppl):S22–30. CrossRef
- Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Luchok KJ, Meyer TE. Adherence to recommendations for follow-up to abnormal Pap tests. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1332–41.
- Del Carmen MG, Findley M, Muzikansky A, et al. Demographic, risk factor, and knowledge differences between Latinas and non-Latinas referred to colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(1):70–6. CrossRef
- McKee MD, Lurio J, Marantz P, Burton W, Mulvihill M. Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in an urban community health center. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(2):129–34. CrossRef
- Reynolds D. Cervical cancer in Hispanic/Latino women. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8(2):146–50. CrossRef
- Tsui J, Saraiya M, Thompson T, Dey A, Richardson L. Cervical cancer screening among foreign-born women by birthplace and duration in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007;16(10):1447–57. CrossRef
- Watts L, Joseph N, Velazquez A, et al. Understanding barriers to cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):199e.1–8. CrossRef
- Ackerson K, Gretebeck K. Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007;19(11):591–601. CrossRef
- Byrd TL, Chavez R, Wilson KM. Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Ethn Dis. 2007;17(1):129–34.
- Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12(3):232–41. CrossRef
- Vanslyke JG, Baum J, Plaza V, Otero M, Wheeler C, Helitzer DL. HPV and cervical cancer testing and prevention: knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes among Hispanic women. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(5):584–96. CrossRef
- Bertram CC, Magnussen L. Informational needs and the experiences of women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(9):455–62. CrossRef
- Sanderson M, Coker AL, Eggleston KS, Fernandez ME, Arrastia CD, Fadden MK. HPV vaccine acceptance among Latina mothers by HPV status. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(11):1793–9. CrossRef
- Watts LA, Joseph N, Wallace M, et al. HPV vaccine: a comparison of attitudes and behavioral perspectives between Latino and non-Latino women. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):577–82. CrossRef
- Swancutt DR, Greenfield SM, Wilson S. Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study. BMC Womens Health. 2008;8:2. CrossRef
- Census. US Census Bureau. Chelsea (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau. 2000 [cited June 2010]; Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/25/2513205.html.
- MassCHIP, Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation, Massachusetts Cancer Registry. 2000-2004 Incidence, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA.
- MassCHIP, Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation, Registry of Vital Records and Statistics. 2004-2006 Mortality, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA.
- Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993:173–94.
- Flores K, Bencomo C. Preventing cervical cancer in the Latina population. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(12):1935–43. CrossRef
- Lerman C, Hanjani P, Caputo C, et al. Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(2):330–3.
- Tomaino-Brunner C, Freda MC, Runowicz CD. "I hope I don't have cancer": colposcopy and minority women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23(1):39–44.
- Stewart DE, Buchegger PM, Lickrish GM, Sierra S. The effect of educational brochures on follow-up compliance in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(4):583–5. CrossRef
- Stewart DE, Lickrish GM, Sierra S, Parkin H. The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(2):280–2.
- Tomaino-Brunner C, Freda MC, Damus K, Runowicz CD. Can precolposcopy education increase knowledge and decrease anxiety? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998;27(6):636–45. CrossRef
- Khanna N, Phillips MD. Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(2):123–30.
- Miller SM, Siejak KK, Schroeder CM, Lerman C, Hernandez E, Helm CW. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(10):703–8. CrossRef
- Sanders G, Craddock C, Wagstaff I. Factors influencing default at a hospital colposcopy clinic. Qual Health Care. 1992;1(4):236–40. CrossRef
- Ell K, Vourlekis B, Muderspach L, et al. Abnormal cervical screen follow-up among low-income Latinas: project SAFe. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11(7):639–51. CrossRef
- Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008;113(8):1999–2010. CrossRef
- Block B, Branham RA. Efforts to improve the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998;11(1):1–11.
- Engelstad LP, Stewart SL, Nguyen BH, et al. Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10(10):1015–20.
- Engelstad LP, Stewart S, Otero-Sabogal R, Leung MS, Davis PI, Pasick RJ. The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer. Prev Med. 2005;41(3–4):741–8. CrossRef
- Marcus AC, Crane LA, Kaplan CP, et al. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies. Med Care. 1992;30(3):216–30. CrossRef
- Dohan D, Schrag D. Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches. Cancer. 2005;104(4):848–55. CrossRef
- Barriers to Follow-Up of an Abnormal Pap Smear in Latina Women Referred for Colposcopy
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 11 , pp 1198-1204
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- health disparities
- patient navigation
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Chelsea HealthCare Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Everett Avenue, Chelsea, MA, 02150, USA
- 2. Center for Community Health Improvement, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- 3. General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA