Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 116–122

Patient Perspectives of Clinical Care and Patient Navigation in Follow-up of Abnormal Mammography

  • Karen Donelan
  • Johanna R. Mailhot
  • David Dutwin
  • Kristen Barnicle
  • Sarah Abernethy Oo
  • Karin Hobrecker
  • Sanja Percac-Lima
  • Bruce A. Chabner
Original Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1436-4

Cite this article as:
Donelan, K., Mailhot, J.R., Dutwin, D. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2011) 26: 116. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1436-4

ABSTRACT

Background

Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and survival are well documented. Patient navigation has been shown to improve timely follow-up of abnormal breast screenings for underserved patients. Few studies showed the impact of navigation on patient experiences of care.

Objective

We compared the experiences of patients enrolled in a patient navigator program and non-navigated patients referred to a hospital breast center for follow-up of abnormal mammogram in an underserved community health center population.

Design

Group comparison study using data from a mail and telephone survey to measure the experience of navigated and non-navigated patients.

Participants

English- and Spanish-speaking patients with abnormal mammography attending the Avon Breast Center between April 1, 2005 and April 30, 2007. Seventy-two navigated patients and 181 non-navigated patients completed surveys; the survey response rate was 53.6%.

Main Measures

Timeliness of care, preparation for the visit to the breast center, ease of access, quality of care, provider communication, unmet need and patient satisfaction.

Key Results

Most measures of the patient experience did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Overall quality of care was rated as excellent (55% vs 62%, p = 0.294). Navigated patients were significantly more likely than non-navigated to ‘definitely’ understand what to expect at their visit (79% vs 60%, p = 0.003), to receive a reminder letter or telephone call (89% vs 77%, p = 0.029), and to feel welcome (89% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Navigated patients were less likely than non-navigated to rate the concern shown for their cultural/religious beliefs as excellent (45% vs 54%, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Assessing patient perspectives is essential to evaluate the success of quality improvement interventions. In our center, we measured few significant disparities in the perceptions of care of these two very different populations of patients, although, there are still areas in which our program needs improvement. Further research is needed to understand the effectiveness of patient navigation programs in reducing racial and ethnic disparities.

KEY WORDS

disparities patient satisfaction community-based interventions evaluation breast cancer 

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Donelan
    • 1
  • Johanna R. Mailhot
    • 1
  • David Dutwin
    • 2
  • Kristen Barnicle
    • 3
  • Sarah Abernethy Oo
    • 4
  • Karin Hobrecker
    • 5
  • Sanja Percac-Lima
    • 4
  • Bruce A. Chabner
    • 6
  1. 1.Mongan Institute for Health PolicyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.International Communications ResearchMediaUSA
  3. 3.Partners Healthcare Community BenefitsBostonUSA
  4. 4.MGH Chelsea HealthCare CenterChelseaUSA
  5. 5.formerly MGH Patient Care ServicesBostonUSA
  6. 6.MGH Cancer CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations