Joy and Challenges in Improving Chronic Illness Care: Capturing Daily Experiences of Academic Primary Care Teams
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Two chronic care collaboratives (The National Collaborative and the California Collaborative) were convened to facilitate implementing the chronic care model (CCM) in academic medical centers and into post-graduate medical education.
We developed and implemented an electronic team survey (ETS) to elicit, in real-time, team member’s experiences in caring for people with chronic illness and the effect of the Collaborative on teams and teamwork.
The ETS is a qualitative survey based on Electronic Event Sampling Methodology. It is designed to collect meaningful information about daily experience and any event that might influence team members’ daily work and subsequent outcomes.
Forty-one residency programs from 37 teaching hospitals participated in the collaboratives and comprised faculty and resident physicians, nurses, and administrative staff.
Each team member participating in the collaboratives received an e-mail with directions to complete the ETS for four weeks during 2006 (the National Collaborative) and 2007 (the California Collaborative).
At the team level, the response rate to the ETS was 87% with team members submitting 1,145 narrative entries. Six key themes emerged from the analysis, which were consistent across all sites. Among teams that achieved better clinical outcomes on Collaborative clinical indicators, an additional key theme emerged: professional work satisfaction, or “Joy in Work”. In contrast, among teams that performed lower in collaborative measures, two key themes emerged that reflected the effect of providing care in difficult institutional environments—“lack of professional satisfaction” and awareness of “system failures”.
The ETS provided a unique perspective into team performance and the day-to-day challenges and opportunities in chronic illness care. Further research is needed to explore systematic approaches to integrating the results from this study into the design of improvement efforts for clinical teams.
- World Health Organization. Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment: World Health Organization; 2005.
- Bodenheimer, T, Chen, E, Bennett, H (2009) Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the U.S. Health Care Workforce do the job?. Health Aff 28: pp. 64-74 CrossRef
- Bodenheimer, T, Wagner, EH, Grumbach, K (2002) Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 288: pp. 1909-14 CrossRef
- Bodenheimer, T, Wagner, EH, Grumbach, K (2002) Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 288: pp. 1775-9 CrossRef
- Coleman, K, Austin, B, Brach, C, Wagner, EH (2009) Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff 28: pp. 75-85 CrossRef
- Council on Graduate Medical Education. Physician Workforce Policy Guildelines for the United States, 2000–2020. Rockville, MD: COGME2005.
- Wagner E, Austin B, Von Korff M. Organizing care for chronic disease. Millbank Quarterly. 1996;(74):511–44.
- McCulloch, D, Price, M, Hindmarsh, M, Wagner, E (2000) Improvement in diabetes care using an integrated population-based approach in a primary care setting. Dis Manag 3: pp. 75-82 CrossRef
- Stevens D, Bowen J, Johnson J, DM W, Provost L, Holman H, et al. A Multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform chronic illness care and education in resident continuity practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010(XX:XX–XX).
- Braithwaite J, Westbrook J, Ranmuthugala G, Cunningham F, Plumb J, Wiley J, et al. The development, design, testing, refinement, simulation, and application of an evaluation framework for communities of practice and social-professional networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(162).
- Wenger, E, McDermott, R, Synder, W (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
- Bowen J, Stevens D, Sixta C, Provost L, Johnson J, DM W, et al. Developing measures of educational change for collaborative teams implementing the chronic care model in teaching practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2010(XX:XX–XX).
- Amabile, T, Whitney, D, Winstock, J, Miller, L, Fallang, C (1997) What Really Happens in Creative Projects: Event Sampling Through Electronic Data Collection. Harvard University, Cambridge
- Csikszentmihalyi, M, Larson, R (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. J Nerv Mental Dis 175: pp. 526-36 CrossRef
- Larson, R, Csikszentmihalyi, M (1983) The experience sampling method. New Dir Methodol Soc Behav Sci 15: pp. 41-56
- Amabile, T, Barsade, S, Mueller, J, Staw, B (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Adm Sci Q 50: pp. 367-403 CrossRef
- Scientific Software Development Company G. ATLAS.ti. Berlin, Germany.
- Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002(36):3392–40.
- Strauss, A, Corbin, J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
- Assessment Scale for Collaboratives. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston
- Schon, D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, Inc, USA
- Csikszentmihalyi, M (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper-Collins, New York
- Amabile, T, Hadley, C, Kramer, S (2002) Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review. 80: pp. 52-61
- Bakke, D (2005) Joy at Work: A Revolutionary Approach to Fun on the Job. PVG, Seattle
- Joy and Challenges in Improving Chronic Illness Care: Capturing Daily Experiences of Academic Primary Care Teams
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 4 Supplement, pp 581-585
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- chronic illness
- joy in work
- graduate medical education
- ambulatory training
- interprofessional training
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
- 2. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 3. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA
- 4. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- 5. Associates in Process Improvement, Austin, TX, USA
- 6. Sixta Consulting, Inc., Houston, TX, USA
- 7. MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Group Health Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA, USA