A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement Initiative to Transform Education for Chronic Illness Care in Resident Continuity Practices
- David P. StevensAffiliated withCenter for Leadership and Improvement, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Email author
- , Judith L. BowenAffiliated withOregon Health and Science University
- , Julie K. JohnsonAffiliated withFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales
- , Donna M. WoodsAffiliated withFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
- , Lloyd P. ProvostAffiliated withAssociates for Process Improvement
- , Halsted R. HolmanAffiliated withStanford University School of Medicine
- , Constance S. SixtaAffiliated withUTHSC School of Nursing
- , Ed H. WagnerAffiliated withMacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Group Health Research Institute
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is a gap between the need for patient-centered, evidence-based primary care for the large burden of chronic illness in the US, and the training of resident physicians to provide that care.
To improve training for residents who provide chronic illness care in teaching practice settings.
US teaching hospitals were invited to participate in one of two 18-month Breakthrough Series Collaboratives—either a national Collaborative, or a subsequent California Collaborative—to implement the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and related curriculum changes in resident practices. Most practices focused on patients with diabetes mellitus. Educational redesign strategies with related performance measures were developed for curricular innovations anchored in the CCM. In addition, three clinical measures—HbA1c <7%, LDL <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure ≤130/80—and three process measures—retinal and foot examinations, and patient self-management goals—were tracked.
Fifty-seven teams from 37 self-selected teaching hospitals committed to implement the CCM in resident continuity practices; 41 teams focusing on diabetes improvement participated over the entire duration of one of the Collaboratives.
Teaching-practice teams—faculty, residents and staff—participated in Collaboratives by attending monthly calls and regular 2-day face-to-face meetings with the other teams. The national Collaborative faculty led calls and meetings. Each team used rapid cycle quality improvement (PDSA cycles) to implement the CCM and curricular changes. Teams reported education and clinical performance measures monthly.
Practices underwent extensive redesign to establish CCM elements. Education measures tracked substantial development of CCM-related learning. The clinical and process measures improved, however inconsistently, during the Collaboratives.
These initiatives suggest that systematic practice redesign for implementing the CCM along with linked educational approaches are achievable in resident continuity practices. Improvement of clinical outcomes in such practices is daunting but achievable.
KEY WORDSresidency training chronic illness teaching hospitals Chronic Care Model
- A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement Initiative to Transform Education for Chronic Illness Care in Resident Continuity Practices
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 4 Supplement, pp 574-580
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- residency training
- chronic illness
- teaching hospitals
- Chronic Care Model
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Leadership and Improvement, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 30 Lafayette Street, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA
- 2. Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- 4. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 5. Associates for Process Improvement, Austin, TX, USA
- 6. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- 7. UTHSC School of Nursing, Houston, TX, USA
- 8. MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA