Are Residents’ Decisions Influenced More by a Decision Aid or a Specialist’s Opinion? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Physicians are reluctant to use decision aids despite their ability to improve care. A potential reason may be that physicians do not believe decision aid advice.
To determine whether internal medicine residents lend more credence to contradictory decision aid or human advice.
Randomized controlled trial. Residents read a scenario of a patient with community-acquired pneumonia and were asked whether they would admit the patient to the intensive care unit or the floor. Residents were randomized to receive contrary advice from either a referenced decision aid or an anonymous pulmonologist. They were then asked, in light of this new information, where they would admit the patient.
One hundred eight internal medicine residents.
The percentage of residents who changed their admission location and the change in confidence in the decision.
Residents were more likely to change their original admission location (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.04 to 5.1, P = 0.04) and to reduce their confidence in the decision (adjusted difference between means −12.9%, 95% CI −3.0% to −22.8%, P = 0.011) in response to the referenced decision aid than to the anonymous pulmonologist. Confidence in their decision was more likely to change if they initially chose to admit the patient to the floor.
In a hypothetical case of community-acquired pneumonia, physicians were influenced more by contrary advice from a referenced decision aid than an anonymous specialist. Whether this holds for advice from a respected specialist or in actual practice remains to be studied.
- Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38. CrossRef
- de Dombal, Dallos V, McAdam WAF. Can computer aided teaching packages improve clinical care in patients with acute abdominal pain? BMJ. 1991;310:1495–7.
- Riddderikhoff J, van Herk E. A diagnostic support system in general practice: is it feasible? Int J Med Inform. 1997;45:133–43. CrossRef
- Friedman DP, Elstein AS, Wolf FM. Enhancement of clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1851–6. CrossRef
- Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D’Orsi CJ, Swets JA. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol. 1988;23:240–52. CrossRef
- Chase CR, Vacek PM, Shinozaki T, Giard AM, Ashikaga T. Medical information management: improving the transfer of research results to presurgical evaluation. Med Care. 1983;21:410–24. CrossRef
- DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, Kaushal R, Levy DE, Rosenbaum S, Shields AE, Blumenthal D. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60. CrossRef
- Corey GA, Merenstein JH. Applying the acute ischemic heart disease predictive instrument. J Fam Pract. 1987;25:127–33.
- Sittig DF, Krall MA, Dykstra RH, Russell A, Chin HL. A survey of factors affecting clinician acceptance of clinical decision support. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2006;6:6. CrossRef
- Arkes HR, Shaffer VA, Medow MA. Patients derogate physicians who use a computer-assisted diagnostic aid. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:189–202. CrossRef
- Arkes HR, Shaffer VA, Medow MA. The influence of a physician’s use of a diagnostic decision aid on the malpractice verdicts of mock jurors. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:201–8. CrossRef
- Dreiseitl S, Binder M. Do physicians value decision support? A look at the effect of decision support systems on physician opinion. Artif Intell Med. 2005;33(1):25–30. CrossRef
- Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(4):243–50. CrossRef
- Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377–82. CrossRef
- R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org accessed 11/25/2009.
- Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, et al. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA. 1991;265(17):2202–7. CrossRef
- Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:15–37. CrossRef
- Berner ES, Maisiak RS, Heudebert GR, Young KR Jr. Clinician performance and prominence of diagnoses displayed by a clinical diagnostic decision support system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:76–80.
- Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Kemka A, Shaw P, Arkes HR. Hemodynamic assessment in the critically ill: is physician confidence warranted? Med Decis Making. 1993;13:258–66. CrossRef
- Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Geller R, Robbins S, Goldman L. Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1249–54. CrossRef
- Are Residents’ Decisions Influenced More by a Decision Aid or a Specialist’s Opinion? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 4 , pp 316-320
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- decision aid
- choice behavior
- internship and residency
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118-2605, USA
- 2. Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- 3. Department of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA