Association Between Hand-off Patients and Subject Exam Performance in Medicine Clerkship Students
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Teaching hospitals increasingly rely on transfers of patient care to another physician (hand-offs) to comply with duty hour restrictions. Little is known about the impact of hand-offs on medical students.
To evaluate the impact of hand-offs on the types of patients students see and the association with their subsequent Medicine Subject Exam performance.
Observational study over 1 year.
Third-year medical students in an Inpatient Medicine Clerkship at five hospitals with night float systems.
Primary outcome: Medicine Subject Exam at the end of the clerkship; explanatory variables: number of fresh (without prior evaluation) and hand-off patients, diagnoses, subspecialty patients, and full evaluations performed during the clerkship, and United Stated Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step I scores.
Of the 2,288 patients followed by 89 students, 990 (43.3%) were hand-offs. In a linear regression model, the only variables significantly associated with students’ Subject Exam percentile rankings were USMLE Step I scores (B = 0.26, P < 0.001) and the number of full evaluations completed on fresh patients (B =0.20, P = 0.048; model r 2 = 0.58). In other words, for each additional fresh patient evaluated, Subject Exam percentile rankings increased 0.2 points. For students in the highest quartile of Subject Exam percentile rankings, only Step I scores showed a significant association (B = 0.22, P = 0.002; r 2 = 0.5). For students in the lowest quartile, only fresh patient evaluations demonstrated a significant association (B = 0.27, P = 0.03; r 2 = 0.34).
Hand-offs constitute a substantial portion of students’ patients and may have less educational value than “fresh” patients, especially for lower performing students.
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common Program Requirements. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acwebsite/dutyhours/dh_lang703.pdf; Accessed May 29, 2009.
- Vidyarthi AR, Katz PP, Wall SD, Wachter RM, Auerbach AD. Impact of reduced duty hours on residents’ educational satisfaction at the University of California, San Francisco. Acad Med. 2006;81(1):76–81. CrossRef
- Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: Strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257–66. CrossRef
- Goldstein MJ, Kim E, Widmann WD, Hardy MA. A 360˚ evaluation of a night-float system for general surgery: A response to mandated work-hours reduction. Curr Surg. 2004;61(5):445–51. CrossRef
- Wallach SL, Alam K, Diaz N, Shine D. How do internal medicine residency programs evaluate their resident float experiences? South Med J. 2006;99(9):919–23. CrossRef
- Peterson LE, Johnson H, Pugno PA, Bazemore A, Phillips RL. Training on the clock: Family medicine residency directors’ responses to resident duty hours reform. Acad Med. 2006;81(12):1032–7. CrossRef
- Horwitz LI, Krumholz HM, Green ML, Huot SJ. Transfers of patient care between staff on internal medicine wards. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1173–7. CrossRef
- Fletcher K, Saint S, Mangrulkar RS. Balancing continuity of care with residents’ limited work hours: Defining the implications. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):39–43. CrossRef
- Kogan JR, Pinto-Powell R, Brown LA, Hemmer P, Bellini LM, Peltier D. The impact of resident duty hours reform on the internal medicine core clerkship: Results from the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine survey. Acad Med. 2006;81(12):1038–44. CrossRef
- Nixon LJ, Benson BJ, Rogers T, Sick BT, Miller WJ. Effects of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work restrictions on medical student experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:937–41. CrossRef
- Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. The impact of resident duty hour reform in a medicine core clerkship. Acad Med. 2004;79(10S):S58–61. CrossRef
- White CB, Haftel HM, Purkiss JA, Schigelone AS, Hammoud MM. Multidimensional effects of the 80-hour work week at the University of Michigan Medical School. Acad Med. 2006;81(1):57–62. CrossRef
- Jagsi R, Shapiro J, Weinstein DF. Perceived impact of resident work hour limitations on medical student clerkships: A survey study. Acad Med. 2005;80(8):752–7. CrossRef
- Norman G. Building on experience: The development of clinical reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;335(21):2251–2. CrossRef
- Bowen J. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;335(21):2217–25. CrossRef
- Defer TM, Fazio SB. Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine-Society of General Internal Medicine. Core medicine clerkship curriculum guide: A resource for teachers and learners, version 3.0. Available at: http://www.im.org/Resources/Education/Students/Learning/Pages/CDIM-SGIMCoreMedicineClerkshipCurriculum.aspx. Accessed May 29, 2009.
- National Board of Medical Examiners. Subject Examination Program Information Guide. 2007; p. 9. Available at: http://www.nbme.org/PDF/2007subexaminfoguide.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2009.
- Griffth CH III, Wilson JF, Haist SA, Ramsbottom-Lucier M. Do students who work with better housestaff in their medicine clerkships learn more? Acad Med. 1998;73(10):S57–9. CrossRef
- Griffith CH III, Wilson JF, Haist SA, Ramsbottom-Lucier M. Relationships of how well attending physicians teach to their students’ performances and residency choices. Acad Med. 1997;72(10):S118–20. CrossRef
- Association Between Hand-off Patients and Subject Exam Performance in Medicine Clerkship Students
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 9 , pp 1018-1022
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- medical student and residency education
- medical education- instructional design
- medical education-cognition/problem solving
- Industry Sectors