Teaching Feedback to First-year Medical Students: Long-term Skill Retention and Accuracy of Student Self-assessment
Giving and receiving feedback are critical skills and should be taught early in the process of medical education, yet few studies discuss the effect of feedback curricula for first-year medical students.
To study short-term and long-term skills and attitudes of first-year medical students after a multidisciplinary feedback curriculum.
Prospective pre- vs. post-course evaluation using mixed-methods data analysis.
First-year students at a public university medical school.
We collected anonymous student feedback to faculty before, immediately after, and 8 months after the curriculum and classified comments by recommendation (reinforcing/corrective) and specificity (global/specific). Students also self-rated their comfort with and quality of feedback. We assessed changes in comments (skills) and self-rated abilities (attitudes) across the three time points.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Across the three time points, students’ evaluation contained more corrective specific comments per evaluation [pre-curriculum mean (SD) 0.48 (0.99); post-curriculum 1.20 (1.7); year-end 0.95 (1.5); p = 0.006]. Students reported increased skill and comfort in giving and receiving feedback and at providing constructive feedback (p < 0.001). However, the number of specific comments on year-end evaluations declined [pre 3.35 (2.0); post 3.49 (2.3); year-end 2.8 (2.1)]; p = 0.008], as did students’ self-rated ability to give specific comments.
Teaching feedback to early medical students resulted in improved skills of delivering corrective specific feedback and enhanced comfort with feedback. However, students’ overall ability to deliver specific feedback decreased over time.
- Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: medical education reviews–providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):508–13. CrossRef
- Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77(12):1185–8. CrossRef
- Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–81. CrossRef
- van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(2):189–97. CrossRef
- Askew S, Lodge C. Gifts, ping-pong and loops - linking feedback and learning. In: Askew S, ed. Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge/Falmer; 2000:1–17.
- Cole KA, Barker LR, Kolodner K, Williamson P, Wright SM, Kern DE. Faculty development in teaching skills: an intensive longitudinal model. Acad Med. 2004;79(5):469–80. CrossRef
- Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):111–6. CrossRef
- Shute V. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78(1):153–89. CrossRef
- Salerno SM, Jackson JL, O’Malley PG. Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(10):831–4. CrossRef
- Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Have you had your feedback today. Acad Med. 2000;75(10):1041. CrossRef
- Regan-Smith M, Hirschmann K, Iobst W. Direct observation of faculty with feedback: an effective means of improving patient-centered and learner-centered teaching skills. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19(3):278–86.
- Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000.
- Shue CK, Arnold L, Stern DT. Maximizing participation in peer assessment of professionalism: the students speak. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S1–5. CrossRef
- Arnold L, Shue CK, Kalishman S, Prislin M, Pohl C, Pohl H, Stern DT. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study. Acad Med. 2007;82(6):578–86. CrossRef
- Spickard A III, Corbett EC Jr, Schorling JB. Improving residents’ teaching skills and attitudes toward teaching. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(8):475–80. CrossRef
- Salerno SM, O’Malley PG, Pangaro LN, Wheeler GA, Moores LK, Jackson JL. Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(10):779–87. CrossRef
- Morrison EH, Rucker L, Boker JR, Gabbert CC, Hubbell FA, Hitchcock MA, Prislin MD. The effect of a 13-hour curriculum to improve residents’ teaching skills: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(4):257–63.
- Haber RJ, Bardach NS, Vedanthan R, Gillum LA, Haber LA, Dhaliwal GS. Preparing fourth-year medical students to teach during internship. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):518–20. CrossRef
- Holmboe ES, Fiebach NF, Galaty L, Huot S. The effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(7):427–34. CrossRef
- Sluijsmans DMA, Brand-Gruwel S, Van Merriënboer JJG. Peer assessment training in teacher education. Assessment Eval Higher Educ. 2002;27(5):443–54. CrossRef
- Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Appl Psychol Meas. Howard GS; 1979;3(1):1–23.18. CrossRef
- Berbano EP, Browning R, Pangaro L, Jackson JL. The impact of the Stanford faculty development program on ambulatory teaching behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):430–4. CrossRef
- Knight AM, Carrese JA, Wright SM. Qualitative assessment of the long-term impact of a faculty development program in teaching skills. Med Educ. 2007;41(6):592–600. CrossRef
- Menachery EP, Knight AM, Kolodner K, Wright SM. Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):440–6. CrossRef
- Rudy DW, Fejfar MC, Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF. Self- and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course. Eval Health Prof. 2001;24(4):436–45.
- Afonso NM, Cardozo LJ, Mascarenhas OA, Aranha ANF, Shah C. Are anonymous evaluations a better assessment of faculty teaching performance? A comparative analysis of open and anonymous evaluation processes. Fam Med. 2005;37(1):43–7.
- Suchman AL, Williamson PR, Litzelman DK, Frankel RM, Mossbarger DL, Inui TS. Relationship-centered care initiative discovery team toward an informal curriculum that teaches professionalism: transforming the social environment of a medical school. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 2):501–4. CrossRef
- Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094–102. CrossRef
- Srinivasan M, Hauer KE, Der-Martirosian C, Wilkes M, Gesundheit N. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ. 2007;41(9):857–65. CrossRef
- Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):173–9. CrossRef
- Prins FJ, Sluijsmans DMA, Kirschner PA. Feedback for general practitioners in training: Styles, quality and preferences. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(3):289–303. CrossRef
- Fitzgerald JT, White CB, Gruppen LD. A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy. Med Educ. 2003;37(7):645–9. CrossRef
- Custers EJFM. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; published ahead of print; doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y. Latest date of access 3/31/09.
- van Wyk JM, McLean M. Maximising the value of feedback for individual facilitator and faculty development. Med Teach. 2007;26(1):e26–31.
- Schum TR, Yindra KJ. Relationship between systematic feedback to faculty and ratings of clinical teaching. Acad Med. 1996;71(10):1100–2. CrossRef
- Yao Y, Weissinger E, Grady M. Faculty use of student evaluation feedback. Pract Assess, Res Eval. 2003;8(21). Retrieved March 9, 2009 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=21.
- Elnicki MD, Layne RD, Ogden PE, Morris DK. Oral versus written feedback in medical clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):155–8. CrossRef
- Teaching Feedback to First-year Medical Students: Long-term Skill Retention and Accuracy of Student Self-assessment
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 6 , pp 721-726
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- medical education
- curriculum development
- qualitative analysis
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, S-1210D, Box 0450, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0450, USA
- 2. Dean’s Office of Medical Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 3. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA