Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference
Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item “pain screening” provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care.
To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI.
Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care.
Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α = 0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r = 0.60–0.89 in Study 1 and r = 0.77–0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months.
We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.
- Improving the Quality of Pain Management Through Measurement and Action. 2003. Oakbrook Terrace, IL, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and National Pharmaceutical Council.
- Carr DB, Jacox AK, Chapman CR, Fillingim RB, Heidrich G, Hester NK. Acute pain management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma. Clinical Practice Guideline (AHCPR Pub. No. 92–0032). 1992. Rockville, MD, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services.
- Jacox A, Carr DB, Payne R. Management of Cancer Pain. Clinical Practice Guideline (AHCPR Publication No. 94–0592). 1994. Rockville, MD, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1994.
- Pain as the 5th vital sign toolkit, revised edition. National Pain Management Coordinating Committee, Veterans Health Administration 2000; Available at: http://www1.va.gov/pain_management/docs/TOOLKIT.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2009.
- Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Ambulatory Care. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2006.
- Dahl JL, Gordon DB. Joint Commission pain standards: a progress report. APS Bulletin 2002;12.
- VHA pain outcomes toolkit. National Pain Management Coordinating Committee, Veterans Health Administration 2003; Available at: http://www1.va.gov/Pain_Management/page.cfm?pg=41. Accessed March 27, 2009.
- Simon L, Lipman A, Jacox A, et al. Guideline for the Management of Arthritis Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis. Glenville, IL: American Pain Society; 2002.
- Turk DC, Melzack R. The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, eds. Handbook of Pain Assessment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2001.
- Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19. CrossRef
- Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003; 106: 337–45. CrossRef
- Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:105–21. CrossRef
- Cleeland CS. Pain assessment in cancer. In: Osoba D, ed. Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991:293–305.
- Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:129–38.
- Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Mendoza TR, Edwards KR, Douglas J, Serlin RC. Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: new information from multidimensional scaling. Pain. 1996;67:267–73. CrossRef
- Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:309–18. CrossRef
- Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004;5:133–7. CrossRef
- Kroenke K, Bair M, Damush T, et al. Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) study: design and practical implications of an intervention for comorbid pain and depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29:506–17. CrossRef
- Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50:133–49. CrossRef
- Elliott AM, Smith BH, Smith WC, Chambers WA. Changes in chronic pain severity over time: the Chronic Pain Grade as a valid measure. Pain. 2000;88:303–8. CrossRef
- Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain. 1997;71:141–7. CrossRef
- Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Barlow W. Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year. Spine. 1993;18:855–62. CrossRef
- Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8:141–4. CrossRef
- Jensen MP, Strom SE, Turner JA, Romano JM. Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1992;50:157–62. CrossRef
- McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63. CrossRef
- Ware JE, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23:49–73.
- Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282:1157–62. CrossRef
- Carey EC, Walter LC, Lindquist K, Covinsky KE. Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1027–1U31. CrossRef
- Coste J, Guillemin F, Pouchot J, Fermanian J. Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:247–52. CrossRef
- Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain, In Press, Corrected Proof.
- Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, McHugo GJ, Baird JC. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. J Pain. 2006;7:192–9. CrossRef
- Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2433–45. CrossRef
- Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–9. CrossRef
- Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79–93. CrossRef
- Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:239–46. CrossRef
- Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992;30:917–25. CrossRef
- Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–89. CrossRef
- Klinkman MS. Competing demands in psychosocial care. A model for the identification and treatment of depressive disorders in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997;19:98–111. CrossRef
- Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:209–14. CrossRef
- Mitchell AJ, Coyne JC. Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:144–51.
- Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:353–61. CrossRef
- Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 6 , pp 733-738
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- primary care
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center on Implementing Evidence-Based Practice, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- 2. Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
- 3. Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- 5. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 6. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- 7. Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 4. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA