Association of Communication Between Hospital-based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes
Patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services are increasingly cared for by hospital-based physicians rather than their primary care providers (PCPs). This separation of hospital and ambulatory care may result in important care discontinuities after discharge. We sought to determine whether communication between hospital-based physicians and PCPs influences patient outcomes.
We approached consecutive patients admitted to general medicine services at six US academic centers from July 2001 to June 2003. A random sample of the PCPs for consented patients was contacted 2 weeks after patient discharge and surveyed about communication with the hospital medical team. Responses were linked with the 30-day composite patient outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits obtained through follow-up telephone survey and National Death Index search. We used hierarchical multi-variable logistic regression to model whether communication with the patient’s PCP was associated with the 30-day composite outcome.
A total of 1,772 PCPs for 2,336 patients were surveyed with 908 PCPs responses and complete patient follow-up available for 1,078 patients. The PCPs for 834 patients (77%) were aware that their patient had been admitted to the hospital. Of these, direct communication between PCPs and inpatient physicians took place for 194 patients (23%), and a discharge summary was available within 2 weeks of discharge for 347 patients (42%). Within 30 days of discharge, 233 (22%) patients died, were readmitted to the hospital, or visited an ED. In adjusted analyses, no relationship was seen between the composite outcome and direct physician communication (adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.56 – 1.34), the presence of a discharge summary (0.84, 95% CI 0.57–1.22), or PCP awareness of the index hospitalization (1.08, 95% CI 0.73–1.59).
Analysis of communication between PCPs and inpatient medical teams revealed much room for improvement. Although communication during handoffs of care is important, we were not able to find a relationship between several aspects of communication and associated adverse clinical outcomes in this multi-center patient sample.
- Wachter RM, Goldman L. The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American health care system. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(7):514–7. CrossRef
- Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002;287(4):487–94. CrossRef
- Lindenauer PK, Rothberg MB, Pekow PS, Kenwood C, Benjamin EM, Auerbach AD. Outcomes of care by hospitalists, general internists, and family physicians. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2589–600. CrossRef
- Wachter RM. An introduction to the hospitalist model. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(4 Pt 2):338–42.
- Alpers A. Key legal principles for hospitalists. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):5S–9S. CrossRef
- Goldman L, Pantilat SZ, Whitcomb WF. Passing the clinical baton: 6 principles to guide the hospitalist. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):36S–9S. CrossRef
- Sox HC. The hospitalist model: perspectives of the patient, the internist, and internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(4 Pt 2):368–72.
- van Walraven C, Seth R, Laupacis A. Dissemination of discharge summaries. Not reaching follow-up physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:737–42.
- Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41. CrossRef
- Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7.
- Pantilat SZ, Lindenauer PK, Katz PP, Wachter RM. Primary care physician attitudes regarding communication with hospitalists. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):15S–20S. CrossRef
- Meltzer D, Manning WG, Morrison J, et al. Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medicine service: results of a trial of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(11):866–74.
- Roccaforte WH, Burke WJ, Bayer BL, Wengel SP. Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(7):697–702.
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. CrossRef
- Wagner E, Duggan MA. Effectiveness of follow up-letters to health care providers in triggering follow-up for women with abnormal results on Papanicolaou testing. CMAJ. 2001;164(2):207–8.
- Robertson CL, Kopans DB. Communication problems after mammographic screening. Radiology. 1989;172(2):443–4.
- Branger PJ, van ’t HA, van der Wouden JC, Duisterhout JS, van Bemmel JH. Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Medinfo. 1998;9(Pt 1):412–6.
- Montalto M, Harris P, Rosengarten P. Impact of general practitioners’ referral letters to an emergency department. Aust Fam Physician. 1994;23(7):1320–25. 1328.
- Crone P. Are preadmission general practitioner telephone calls of value? A study in communication. N Z Med J. 1987;100(833):632–4.
- Ferguson JA, Goldacre MJ, Henderson J, Gillmer MD. Audit of workload in gynaecology: analysis of time trends from linked statistics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98(8):772–7.
- van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92. CrossRef
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Joint Commission national patient safety goals. 2007. Ref Type: Report.
- Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8.
- Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):317–23. CrossRef
- Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited. JAMA. 1990;264(15):1980–3. CrossRef
- Halm EA, Magaziner J, Hannan EL, et al. Frequency and impact of active clinical issues and new impairments on hospital discharge in patients with hip fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(1):108–13. CrossRef
- Baker DW, Einstadter D, Husak SS, Cebul RD. Trends in postdischarge mortality and readmissions: has length of stay declined too far. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(5):538–44. CrossRef
- Association of Communication Between Hospital-based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 3 , pp 381-386
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- hospitalist care
- continuity of care
- physician communication
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departments of Medicine and Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 2. St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
- 3. Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- 4. BWF Hospitalist Service and Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- 5. University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 6. Iowa City VA Medical Center and the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
- 7. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- 8. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- 9. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA