“What is Found There”1: Qualitative Analysis of Physician–Nurse Collaboration Stories
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Effective physician–nurse collaboration is an important, but incompletely understood determinant of patient and nurse satisfaction, and patient safety. Its impact on physicians has not been described. This study was undertaken to develop a fuller understanding of the collaboration experience and its outcomes.
Twenty-five medical residents, 32 staff nurses, 5 physician and 5 nurse faculty wrote narratives about successful collaboration; the narratives were then qualitatively analyzed. Narrative analysis was the initial qualitative method iteratively employed to identfy themes. A phenomenological approach was subsequently used to develop a framework for collaborative competence.
Collaboration triggers, facilitative behaviors, outcomes and collaborative competence were the themes identified. Affect was identified in the triggers leading to collaboration and in its outcomes. Practioners typically entered a care episode feeling worrried, uncertain or inadequate and finished the interaction feeling satisfied, understood and grateful to their colleagues. The frequency of affective experience was not altered by gender, profession, or ethnicity. These experiences were particularly powerful for novice practioners of both disciplines and appear to have both formative and transformative potential. Collaborative competence was characterized by a series of graduated skills in clinical and relational domains. Many stories took place in the ICU and afterhours settings.
Despite the prevailing wisdom that nursing and medicine are qualitatively different, the stories from this study illuminate surprising commonalities in the collaboration experience, regardless of gender, age, experience, or profession. Collaborative competence can be defined and its component skills identified. Contexts of care can be identified that offer particularly rich opportunities to foster interprofessional collaboration.
- Williams WC. Asphodel. New Directions Publishing Corporation; 1962.
- Knaus W, Draper E, Wagner D, Zimmerman S. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Int Med. 1986;104:410–8.
- Baggs JG, Schmitt MH, Mushlin AI, et al. Association between nurse–physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(9):1991–8. CrossRef
- Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, et al. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Med Care. 2000;38(8):807–19. CrossRef
- Rosenstein AH. Nurse–Physician relationships: impact on nurse satisfaction and retention. Am J Nurs. 2002;102(6):26–34.
- Baggs JG, Ryan SA. ICU nurse–physician collaboration and nursing satisfaction. Nurs Econ. 1990;8(6):386–92.
- Larrabee JH, Ostrow CL, Withrow ML, et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction with inpatient hospital nursing care. Res Nurs Health. 2004;27(4):254–68. CrossRef
- Nadolski GJ, Bell MA, Brewer BB. Evaluating the quality of interaction between medical students and nurses in a large teaching hospital. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:23. CrossRef
- Rosenstein AH, O’Daniel M. Disruptive behavior and clinical outcomes: perceptions of nurses and physicians. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(1):54–64.
- Benner AB. Physician and nurse relationships, a key to patient safety. J Ky Med Assoc. 2007;105(4):165–9.
- Horak BJ, Pauig J, Keidan B, Kerns J. Patient safety: a case study in team building and interdisciplinary collaboration. J Health Qual. 2004;26(2):6–12.
- Sim TA, Joyner J. A multidisciplinary team approach to reducing medication variance. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28(7):403–9.
- ACGME Outcomes Project: General Competencies http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp; Accessed November 2008.
- Baggs J, Schmitt MH. Nurses and resident-physicians’ perceptions of the process of collaboration in a MICU. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:71–80. CrossRef
- Baggs JG. Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions. J Adv Nurs. 1994;20(1):176–82. CrossRef
- Hojat M, Fields SK, Veloski JJ. Psychometric properties of an attitude scale measuring physician–nurse collaboration. Eval Health Prof. 1999;22(2):208–20. CrossRef
- Hojat M, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJ, et al. Attitudes toward physician–nurse collaboration: a cross-cultural study of male and female physicians and nurses in the United States and Mexico. Nurs Res. 2001;50(2):123–8. CrossRef
- Yildirim A, Akinci F, Ates M, et al. Turkish version of the Jefferson Scale of attitudes toward physician–nurse collaboration: a preliminary study. D.Contemp Nurse. 2006;23(1):38–45.
- Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ. Comparisons of American, Israeli, Italian and Mexican physicians and nurses on the total and factor scores of the Jefferson scale of attitudes toward physician–nurse collaborative relationships. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(4):427–35. CrossRef
- Stein L. The doctor–nurse game. Arch of Gen Psychiatry. 1967;16:699–703.
- Lingard L, Espin S, Evans C, Hawryluck L. Crit Care. The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team. Crit Care. 2004;8(6):R403. CrossRef
- Larson EB, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient–physician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293(9):1100–6. CrossRef
- Thesen J, Kuzel AJ. Participatory inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:269–92.
- Cooperrider D, Whitney D. Collaborating for Change: Appreciative Inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Communications; 1999.
- Bushe G. Appreciative inquiry with teams. Organ Dev J. 1998;16(3):41–50.
- Bushe G. Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In: Cooperrider D, Sorenson P, Whitney D, Yeager T, eds. Appreciative Inquiry: An Emerging Direction for Organization Development. Champaign, IL: Stipes; 2001.
- Burke K. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.
- Creswell JW. Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Thousand Parks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2007:53–84.
- Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publishers; 1994.
- Groenewald T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1)1–26.
- Hitzler R, Reiner K. On sociological and common sense verstehen. Curr Sociol. 1989;37:91–101. CrossRef
- Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2007.
- Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Standards of Validation and Evaluation. Thousand Parks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2007:207–9.
- Gilcrist VJ, Williams RL. Chap 4, key informant interviews. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:71–88.
- Ashworth P. Nurse–doctor relationships: conflict, competition or collaboration. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000;16(3):127–8. CrossRef
- Mason DJ. MD-RN: a tired old dance. Am J Nursing. 2002;102(6):7.
- Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(3):956–9. CrossRef
- Coombs M, Ersser SJ. Medical hegemony in decision making: a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(3):245–52. CrossRef
- Hawryluck LA, Espin SL, Garwood KC, Evan CA, Lingard LA. Pulling together and pushing apart: tides of tension in the ICU team. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S73–6. CrossRef
- Thomson S. Nurse–Physician collaboration: a comparison of the attitudes of physicians and nurses in the medical surgical setting. MedSurg Nurs. 2007;16(2):87–91.
- Fiscella K, Roman-Diaz M, Lue BH, Botelho R, Frankel R. ‘Being a foreigner, I may be punished if I make a small mistake’: assessing trans-cultural experiences in caring for patients. Fam Pract. 1997;14(2):112–6. CrossRef
- Apker J, Propp KM, Zabava Ford WS, Hofmeister N. Collaboration, credibility, compassion, and coordination: professional nurse communication skill sets in health care team interactions. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(3):180–9. CrossRef
- Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Securing “good” nurse–physician relationships. Nurs Manage. 2003;July 34–8.
- Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care a constructive reframing. the Relationship-Centered Care Research Network J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(S1):S3–8. CrossRef
- Tresolini C. Relationship-Centered Care: Report of the Pew-Fetzer Task Force on Advancing Psychosocial Health Education, 1994. http://futurehealth.ucsf.edu/pdf_files/RelationshipCentered.pdf, accessed, 7/08.
- Watson J. Caring theory as an ethical guide to administrative and clinical practice. Nursing Admin Q. 2006;30(1)48–55.
- Sumerel MB. Parallel Process in Supervision. ERIC Digest 1994-04-0015.
- Canadian Inter-professional Health Collaborative. Inter-professional Education & Core Competencies Literature Review. May 2007. Accessed July, 2008. http://www.cihc.ca/about/curricula.html.
- Rabow M, Gargani J, Cooke M. Do as I say: curricular discordance in medical school end-of-life care education. J Palliat Med. 2007;10(3):759–69. CrossRef
- “What is Found There”1: Qualitative Analysis of Physician–Nurse Collaboration Stories
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 2 , pp 198-204
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- relationship-centered practice
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
- 2. Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA
- 5. 275 Parkview Drive, Rochester, NY, 14625, USA
- 3. Fulbright Program, Washington, DC, USA
- 4. Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Boulevard, Rochester, NY, 14642-8409, USA