The Increasing Number of Clinical Items Addressed During the Time of Adult Primary Care Visits
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Primary care physicians report that there is insufficient time to meet patients’ needs during clinical visits, but visit time has increased over the past decade.
To determine whether the number of clinical items addressed during the primary care visit has increased, and if so, whether this has been associated with changes in visit length and the pace of clinical work.
Analysis of non-hospital-based adult primary care visits from 1997 to 2005, as reported in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
A total of 46,431 adult primary care visits.
We assessed changes over time for the total number of clinical items addressed per visit (including diagnoses, medications, tests ordered, and counseling), visit duration, and average available time per clinical item. In adjusted analyses we controlled for patient and physician characteristics.
The number of clinical items addressed per visit increased from 5.4 to 7.1 from 1997 to 2005 (p < 0.001). Visit duration concurrently increased from 18.0 to 20.9 min (p < 0.001). The increase in the number of clinical items outpaced the increase in duration, resulting in a decrease in time per clinical item from 4.4 to 3.8 (p = 0.04). These changes occurred across patient age and payer status and were confirmed in adjusted analyses.
The volume of work associated with primary care visits has increased to a greater extent than has visit duration, resulting in less available time to address individual items. These findings have important implications for reimbursing physician time and improving the quality of care.
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. CrossRef
- Ma J, Stafford RS. Quality of US outpatient care: temporal changes and racial/ethnic disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1354–61. CrossRef
- Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB. Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:337–442. CrossRef
- Stafford RS, Radley DC. The underutilization of cardiac medications of proven benefit, 1990 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:56–61. CrossRef
- Kassirer JP. Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1543–5. CrossRef
- Mechanic D. Physician discontent: challenges and opportunities. JAMA. 2003;290:941–6. CrossRef
- Center for Studying Health System Change. So much to do, so little time: physician capacity constraints 1997–2001; 2003. http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/556/556.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2008.
- Weeks WB, Wallace AE. Time and money: a retrospective evaluation of the inputs, outputs, efficiency, and incomes of physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:944–8. CrossRef
- Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;344:198–204. CrossRef
- Grant RW, Pirraglia PA, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Trends in complexity of diabetes care in the United States from 1991 to 2000. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1134–9. CrossRef
- Cherry D, Burt CW, Woodwell DA. Advance data from the vital and health statistics: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2001 data summary, number 337. National Center for Health Statistics; 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad337.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2008.
- National Center for Health Statistics. National ambulatory medical care survey. Public-use files and documentation. Hyattsville, MD; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003.
- Department of Health and Human Services. International classification of diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).
- Food and Drug Administration. National Drug Code Directory. http://www.fda.gov/cder/ndc/. Accessed September 2, 2008.
- Wilson IB, Schoen C, Neuman P. Physician-patient communication about prescription medication nonadherence: a 50-state study of America’s seniors. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:6–12. CrossRef
- Lasker RD, Marquis MS. The intensity of physicians’ work in patient visits-implications for the coding of patient evaluation and management services. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:337–41. CrossRef
- Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41. CrossRef
- Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1871–94. CrossRef
- Casalino LP. Disease management and the organization of physician practice. JAMA. 2005;293:485–8. CrossRef
- Goodson JD, Bierman AS, Fein O, Rask K, Rich EC, Selker HP. The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:250–6. CrossRef
- Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. A primary care home for Americans: putting the house in order. JAMA. 2002;288:889–93. CrossRef
- Barr M, Ginsburg J. The advanced medical home: a patient-centered, physician-guided model of health care. American College of Physicians; 2006. http://www.acponline.org/ppvl/policies/e001092.html. Accessed September 2, 2008.
- Weiss KB. Managing complexity in chronic care: an overview of the VA state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22Suppl 3374–8. CrossRef
- Whittle J, Bosworth H. Studying complexity is complex. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22Suppl 3379–81. CrossRef
- Werner RM, Greenfield S, Fung C, Turner BJ. Measuring quality of care in patients with multiple clinical conditions: summary of a conference conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1206–11. CrossRef
- Safford MM, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI. Patient complexity: more than comorbidity. the vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22Suppl 3382–90. CrossRef
- Safford MM, Shewchuk R, Qu H. Reasons for not intensifying medications: differentiating “clinical inertia” from appropriate care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1648–55. CrossRef
- Gottschalk A, Flocke SA. Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:488–93. CrossRef
- Gilchrist V, McCord G, Schrop SL. Physician activities during time out of the examination room. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:494–9. CrossRef
- Gilchrist VJ, Stange KC, Flocke SA, McCord G, Bourguet CC. A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits. Med Care. 2004;42:276–80. CrossRef
- Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR. Illuminating the ‘black box’. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:377–89.
- Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA. 2003;289:76–9. CrossRef
- The Increasing Number of Clinical Items Addressed During the Time of Adult Primary Care Visits
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 12 , pp 2058-2065
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- primary care
- clinical items
- visit duration
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 5. The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2. School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA
- 3. Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 4. Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA