The Relationship Between Measured Performance and Satisfaction with Care Among Clinically Complex Patients
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Recent work has shown that clinically complex patients are more likely to receive recommended care, but it is unknown whether higher achievement on individual performance goals results in improved care for complex patients or detracts from other important but unmeasured aspects of care, resulting in unmet needs and lower satisfaction with care.
To examine the relationship between measured performance and satisfaction with care among clinically complex patients
Design and Participants
An observational analysis of a national sample of 35,927 veterans included in the External Peer Review Program in fiscal years 2003 and 2004.
First, compliance with individual performance measures (breast cancer screening with mammography, colorectal cancer screening, influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, lipid monitoring, use of ACE inhibitor in heart failure, and diabetic eye examination), as well as overall receipt of recommended care, was estimated as a function of each patient’s clinical complexity. Second, global satisfaction with care was estimated as a function of clinical complexity and compliance with performance measures.
Higher clinical complexity was predictive of slightly higher overall performance (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18) and higher performance on most individual performance measures, an effect that was mediated by increased visit frequency. High measured performance was associated with higher satisfaction with care among patients with high clinical complexity. In fact, as complexity increased, the effect of achieving high performance on the odds of being satisfied with care also increased
Not only was measured performance higher in clinically complex patients, but satisfaction with care was also higher among clinically complex patients with high measured performance, suggesting that compliance with performance measures in clinically complex patients does not crowd out unmeasured care.
- Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003;41:I-30–8. CrossRef
- Werner RM, Asch DA. Clinical concerns about clinical performance measurement. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:159–63. CrossRef
- Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA. 2005;293:1239–44. CrossRef
- Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1147–50. CrossRef
- Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–24. CrossRef
- Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST Jr., Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2870–74. CrossRef
- Min LC, Wenger NS, Fung C, et al. Multimorbidity is associated with better quality of care among vulnerable elders. Med Care. 2007;45:480–8. CrossRef
- Higashi T, Wenger NS, Adams JL, et al. Relationship between Number of Medical Conditions and Quality of Care. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2496–504. CrossRef
- Kizer KW. The “new VA”: a national laboratory for health care quality management. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:3–20. CrossRef
- Kizer KW, Demakis JG, Feussner JR. Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care. 2000;38:I-7–16. CrossRef
- Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2218–27. CrossRef
- Doebbeling BN, Vaughn TE, Woolson RF, et al. Benchmarking Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in the delivery of preventive health services: comparison of methods. Med Care. 2002;40:540–54. CrossRef
- Wright SM, Craig T, Campbell S, Schaefer J, Humble C. Patient satisfaction of female and male users of Veterans Health Administration services. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S26–32. CrossRef
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. 2007; Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri/. Accessed June 11, 2008.
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. HEDIS & Quality Measurement. 2006; Available at: http://web.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx. Accessed 6/11/2008.
- Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR, et al. Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: a profile at state and national levels. JAMA. 2000;284:1670–6. CrossRef
- Min LC, Reuben DB, MacLean CH, et al. Predictors of overall quality of care provided to vulnerable older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1705–11. CrossRef
- Ellis RP, Pope GC, Iezzoni LI, et al. Diagnosis-based risk adjustment for Medicare capitation payments. Health Care Financ Rev. 1996;17:101–28.
- DxCG. DxCG RiskSmart Stand Alone V2.1.1 User Guide. Boston, MA 2006.
- Rosen AK, Loveland S, Anderson JJ, et al. Evaluating diagnosis-based case-mix measures: how well do they apply to the VA population? Med Care. 2001;39:692–704. CrossRef
- Petersen LA, Pietz K, Woodard LD, Byrne M. Comparison of the predictive validity of diagnosis-based risk adjusters for clinical outcomes. Med Care. 2005;43:61–7.
- Werner RM, Greenfield S, Fung C, Turner BJ. Measuring quality of care in patients with multiple clinical conditions: summary of a conference conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1206–11. CrossRef
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83. CrossRef
- Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9. CrossRef
- Weeks WB, Bott DM, Bazos DA, et al. Veterans Health Administration patients’ use of the private sector for coronary revascularization in New York: opportunities to improve outcomes by directing care to high-performance hospitals. Med Care. 2006;44:519–26. CrossRef
- Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:1690–1. CrossRef
- Anderson G, Horvarth J. Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press; 2002.
- Breen A, Breen R. Back pain and satisfaction with chiropractic treatment: what role does the physical outcome play? Clin J Pain. 2003;19:263–8. CrossRef
- Edlund MJ, Young AS, Kung FY, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Does satisfaction reflect the technical quality of mental health care? Health Serv Res. 2003;38:631–45. CrossRef
- Gross R, Tabenkin H, Porath A, et al. The relationship between primary care physicians’ adherence to guidelines for the treatment of diabetes and patient satisfaction: findings from a pilot study. Fam Pract. 2003;20:563–9. CrossRef
- Orlando M, Meredith LS. Understanding the causal relationship between patient-reported interpersonal and technical quality of care for depression. Med Care. 2002;40:696–704. CrossRef
- Meredith LS, Orlando M, Humphrey N, Camp P, Sherbourne CD. Are better ratings of the patient-provider relationship associated with higher quality care for depression? Med Care. 2001;39:349–60. CrossRef
- Druss BG, Rosenheck RA, Stolar M. Patient satisfaction and administrative measures as indicators of the quality of mental health care. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:1053–8.
- Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25:25–36.
- Chang JT, Hays RD, Shekelle PG, et al. Patients’ global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:665–72.
- Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:609–20. CrossRef
- Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med. 1998;73:993–7. CrossRef
- Cohen DS, Colliver JA, Marcy MS, Fried ED, Swartz MH. Psychometric properties of a standardized-patient checklist and rating-scale form used to assess interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 1996;71:S87–9. CrossRef
- Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams VS, et al. Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. Med Care. 1999;37:22–31. CrossRef
- Shea JA, Guerra CE, Ravenell KL, McDonald VJ, Henry CA, Asch DA. Health literacy weakly but consistently predicts primary care patient dissatisfaction. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:45–9. CrossRef
- Mah JK, Tough S, Fung T, Douglas-England K, Verhoef M. Parents’ global rating of mental health correlates with SF-36 scores and health services satisfaction. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1395–401. CrossRef
- Weech-Maldonado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Marshall G, Hays RD. Race/ethnicity, language, and patients’ assessments of care in Medicaid managed care. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:789–808. CrossRef
- Shea JA, Guerra CE, Weiner J, Aguirre AC, Ravenell KL, Asch DA. Adapting a patient satisfaction instrument for low literate and Spanish-speaking populations: Comparison of three formats. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;in press.
- The Relationship Between Measured Performance and Satisfaction with Care Among Clinically Complex Patients
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 11 , pp 1729-1735
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- measured performance
- patient satisfaction
- clinically complex patients
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 4. Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA