A Method to Quantify Residents’ Jargon Use During Counseling of Standardized Patients About Cancer Screening
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Jargon is a barrier to effective patient-physician communication, especially when health literacy is low or the topic is complicated. Jargon is addressed by medical schools and residency programs, but reducing jargon usage by the many physicians already in practice may require the population-scale methods used in Quality Improvement.
To assess the amount of jargon used and explained during discussions about prostate or breast cancer screening. Effective communication is recommended before screening for prostate or breast cancer because of the large number of false-positive results and the possible complications from evaluation or treatment.
Primary care internal medicine residents.
Transcripts of 86 conversations between residents and standardized patients were abstracted using an explicit-criteria data dictionary. Time lag from jargon words to explanations was measured using “statements,” each of which contains one subject and one predicate.
Duplicate abstraction revealed reliability κ = 0.92. The average number of unique jargon words per transcript was 19.6 (SD = 6.1); the total jargon count was 53.6 (SD = 27.2). There was an average of 4.5 jargon-explanations per transcript (SD = 2.3). The ratio of explained to total jargon was 0.15. When jargon was explained, the average time lag from the first usage to the explanation was 8.4 statements (SD = 13.4).
The large number of jargon words and low number of explanations suggest that many patients may not understand counseling about cancer screening tests. Educational programs and faculty development courses should continue to discourage jargon usage. The methods presented here may be useful for feedback and quality improvement efforts.
- Donabedian, A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA 260: pp. 1743-1748 CrossRef
- Roter DL, Hall JA, eds. Doctors Talking with Patients, Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Auburn House: Westport, Connecticut; 1992.
- Coulehan, JL, Block, MR (2006) The medical interview: mastering skills for clinical practice. F.A. Davis Co., Philadelphia
- Makoul, G (2001) Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med 76: pp. 390-393 CrossRef
- Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer A, Kindig D, eds. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. National Academies Press: Washington, DC; 2004.
- Smith, RC, Marshall-Dorsey, AA, Osborn, GG (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing. Patient Educ Couns 39: pp. 27-36 CrossRef
- Stillman, PL, Sabers, DL, Redfield, DL (1976) The use of paraprofessionals to teach interviewing skills. Pediatrics 57: pp. 769-774
- The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Fourth ed. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company: 2006.
- American Academy of Family Physicians. Summary of AAFP Recommendations for Clinical Preventive Services, Revision 6.4. 2007 [accessed 06/04/2008]; Available from: http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/clinical/exam.html.
- Screening for prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med 126: pp. 480-484
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. Oncology 14: pp. 267-272
- Smith, RA, Cokkinides, V, Eyre, HJ (2007) Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin 57: pp. 90-104 CrossRef
- Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137: pp. 915-916
- Veterans Health Administration, ed. VHA Handbook 1120.2 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Program. Department of Veterans Affairs: Washington, DC; 1999.
- Qaseem, A, Snow, V, Sherif, K, Aronson, M, Weiss, KB, Owens, DK (2007) Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 146: pp. 511-515
- Ransohoff, DF, Harris, RP (1997) Lessons from the mammography screening controversy: can we improve the debate?. Ann Intern Med 127: pp. 1029-1034
- Donovan J, Deuster L, Christopher SA, Farrell, MH. Residents’ precautionary discussion of emotions during communication about cancer screening, poster at 2007 annual meeting of the Society for General Internal Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Donovan JJ, Farrell MH, Deuster L, Christopher SA. “Precautionary empathy” by child health providers after newborn screening. Poster at International Conference on Communication and Health Care, Charleston, SC; 2007.
- Farrell MH, Deuster L, Donovan J, Christopher SA. Pediatric residents’ use of jargon during counseling about newborn genetic screening results. Pediatrics, in press, August 2008.
- Farrell, MH, Kuruvilla, PE (2008) Assessment of understanding: A quality indicator for communication after newborn genetic screening. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2: pp. 199-204 CrossRef
- Farrell, MH, Pean, A, Ladouceur, L (2005) Content of communication by pediatric residents after newborn genetic screening. Pediatrics 116: pp. 1492-1498 CrossRef
- Pean, A, Farrell, MH (2005) Initially misleading communication of carrier results after newborn genetic screening. Pediatrics 116: pp. 1499-1505 CrossRef
- Bylund, CL, Brown, RF, Ciccone, BL, Levin, TT, Gueguen, JA, Hill, C, Kissane, DW (2008) Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: Development and evaluation of a workshop. Patient Educ Couns 70: pp. 430-436 CrossRef
- Lang, F, Everett, K, McGowen, R, Bennard, B (2000) Faculty development in communication skills instruction: insights from a longitudinal program with “real-time feedback”. Acad Med 75: pp. 1222-1228 CrossRef
- Braddock, CH, Edwards, KA, Hasenberg, NM, Laidley, TL, Levinson, W (1999) Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 282: pp. 2313-2320 CrossRef
- Graber, DA The Theoretical Base: Schema Theory. In: Graber, DA eds. (1988) Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. Longman, New York, pp. 27-31
- Miller, GA (1994) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 101: pp. 343-352 CrossRef
- Seel, N (2006) Mental Models in Learning Situations. Adv Psychol 138: pp. 85-110 CrossRef
- White, JD, Carlston, DE (1983) Consequences of Schemata for Attention, Impressions, and Recall in Complex Social Interactions. J Pers Soc Psychol 45: pp. 538-549 CrossRef
- Roter D. Roter Interaction Analysis System Coding Manual. [accessed 06/04/2008]; Available from: http://www.rias.org/manual.
- Feinstein, A (1985) Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
- Stedman, TL (2006) Stedman’s medical dictionary. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
- Farrell MH. R01 HL086691, Improvement of communication process and outcomes after newborn genetic screening. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Medical College of Wisconsin: 2008.
- Castro, CM, Wilson, C, Wang, F, Schillinger, D (2007) Babel babble: physicians’ use of unclarified medical jargon with patients. Am J Health Behav 31: pp. S85-S95
- Keselman, A, Tse, T, Crowell, J, Browne, A, Ngo, L, Zeng, Q (2007) Assessing consumer health vocabulary familiarity: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res 9: pp. e5 CrossRef
- Jencks, SF, Huff, ED, Cuerdon, T (2003) Change in the Quality of Care Delivered to Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001. JAMA 289: pp. 305-312 CrossRef
- A Method to Quantify Residents’ Jargon Use During Counseling of Standardized Patients About Cancer Screening
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 12 , pp 1947-1952
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- 2. Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population Health-Bioethics, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Milwaukee, WI, USA