The Relationship Between Multimorbidity and Patients’ Ratings of Communication
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The growing interest in pay-for-performance and other quality improvement programs has generated concerns about potential performance measurement penalties for providers who care for more complex patients, such as patients with more chronic conditions. Few data are available on how multimorbidity affects common performance metrics.
To examine the relationship between multimorbidity and patients’ ratings of communication, a common performance metric.
Nationally representative sample of U.S. residents
A total of 15,709 noninstitutionalized adults living in the United States participated in a telephone interview.
We used 2 different measures of multimorbidity: 1) “individual conditions” approach disregards similarities/concordance among chronic conditions and 2) “condition-groups” approach considers similarities/concordance among conditions. We used a composite measure of patients’ ratings of patient–physician communication.
A higher number of individual conditions is associated with lower ratings of communication, although the magnitude of the relationship is small (adjusted average communication scores: 0 conditions, 12.20; 1–2 conditions, 12.06; 3+ conditions, 11.90; scale range 5 = worst, 15 = best). This relationship remains statistically significant when concordant relationships among conditions are considered (0 condition groups 12.19; 1–2 condition groups 12.03; 3+ condition groups 11.94).
In our nationally representative sample, patients with more chronic conditions gave their doctors modestly lower patient–doctor communication scores than their healthier counterparts. Accounting for concordance among conditions does not widen the difference in communication scores. Concerns about performance measurement penalty related to patient complexity cannot be entirely addressed by adjusting for multimorbidity. Future studies should focus on other aspects of clinical complexity (e.g., severity, specific combinations of conditions).
- Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS Surveys and Tools. Available at https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/default.asp. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Safran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998;36:728. CrossRef
- Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, et al. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:13–21. CrossRef
- Fung CH, Elliott MN, Hays RD, et al. Patients’ preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:957. CrossRef
- Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.
- Pacific Business Group on Health. Healthscope. Available at http://www.healthscope.org/default.asp. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Jackson C. California HMO: Doctor bonuses based on patient satisfaction. AMNews Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2001/07/30/bil10730.htm. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Ryan R. Primary Care Redesign. The Permanente Journal. Available at http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/fall97pj/redesign.html. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Werner RM, Greenfield S, Fung CH, Turner BJ. Measuring Quality of Care in Complex Patients: Findings from a Conference Organized by the Society of General Internal Medicine. Available at http://www.sgim.org/PDF/SGIMReports/MeasuringQualityCareFinalReportOct42006.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Werner RM, Greenfield S, Fung C, Turner BJ. Measuring quality of care in patients with multiple clinical conditions: summary of a conference conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1206–11. CrossRef
- Yancik R, Ershler W, Satariano W, Hazzard W, Cohen HJ, Ferrucci L. Report of the national institute on aging task force on comorbidity. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:275–80.
- Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:223–8. CrossRef
- Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2269–76. CrossRef
- Parchman ML, Noel PH, Lee S. Primary care attributes, health care system hassles, and chronic illness. Med Care. 2005;43:1123–9. CrossRef
- Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1871–94. CrossRef
- Community Tracking Study Household Survey, 2000–2001:[United States] [Computer file]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Ann Arbor: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003.
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635. CrossRef
- Chang JT, Hays RD, Shekelle PG, et al. Patients’ global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:665–72.
- Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1509–27. CrossRef
- Frequently Asked Questions. Available at https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/default.asp. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Calculate Your Body Mass Index. Available at http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Fiellin DA, Reid MC, O’Connor PG. Outpatient management of patients with alcohol problems. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:815–27.
- Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Available at http://www.hosonline.org/surveys/hos/download/HOS_DUG_PUF_CVIIB.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- Katz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O, Fossel AH, Bates DW. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care. 1996;34:73–84. CrossRef
- Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:725–31. CrossRef
- Schellevis FG, van der Velden J, van de Lisdonk E, van Eijk JT, van Weel C. Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:469–73. CrossRef
- Van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Roos S, Knottnerus JA. Problems in determining occurrence rates of multimorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:675–9. CrossRef
- Landon BE, Zaslavsky AM, Bernard SL, Cioffi MJ, Cleary PD. Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care. JAMA. 2004;291:1744–52. CrossRef
- Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A, et al. Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care. 2001;39:635–41. CrossRef
- Morales LS, Elliott MN, Weech-Maldonado R, Spritzer KL, Hays RD. Differences in CAHPS adult survey reports and ratings by race and ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:595–617.
- Graubard B, Korn E. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics. 55:652–9.
- Werner RM, Asch DA. Clinical concerns about clinical performance measurement. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:159–63. CrossRef
- Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
- Min LC, Wenger NS, Fung C, et al. Multimorbidity is associated with better quality of care among vulnerable elders. Med Care. 2007;45:480–8. CrossRef
- Higashi T, Wenger NS, Adams J, et al. Patients with more medical conditions receive better quality care: analysis of quality data from three large surveys. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:2496–504. CrossRef
- Noel PH, Chris Frueh B, Larme AC, et al. Collaborative care needs and preferences of primary care patients with multimorbidity. Health Expect. 2005;8:54–63. CrossRef
- Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L. Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:352.
- Nutting PA, Rost K, Smith J, Werner JJ, Elliot C. Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over 6 months. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1059. CrossRef
- Street RL Jr. Communication in medical encounters: an ecological perspective. In: Thompson TL, Dorsey AM, Miller KI, Parrott R, eds. Handbook of Health Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
- Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC, Langa D, Flocke SA. Trade-offs in high-volume primary care practice. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:397–402.
- Damiano P, Elliott M, Tyler MC, Hays RD. Differential use of the CAHPS 0–10 global rating scale by Medicaid and commercial populations. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 2004;5:193–205. CrossRef
- Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:213.
- Burack JH, Impellizzeri P, Homel P, Cunningham JN Jr. Public reporting of surgical mortality: a survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1195–1200. discussion 201–2. CrossRef
- Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr., Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA. 1994;271:761–6. CrossRef
- Street RL Jr., Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43:960–9. CrossRef
- Comorbidity: From Bedside to Bench. Summary of the NIA/AGS R13 Conference. Available at www.americangeriatrics.org/research/confseries/CombinedfilesAGSComorbidityPresentation.ppt. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- The Relationship Between Multimorbidity and Patients’ Ratings of Communication
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 6 , pp 788-793
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- patient–physician communication
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Zynx Health, Incorporated, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 4. Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 2. RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- 3. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA