Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 788–793

The Relationship Between Multimorbidity and Patients’ Ratings of Communication

  • Constance H. Fung
  • Claude M. Setodji
  • Fuan-Yue Kung
  • Joan Keesey
  • Steven M. Asch
  • John Adams
  • Elizabeth A. McGlynn
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0602-4

Cite this article as:
Fung, C.H., Setodji, C.M., Kung, F. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2008) 23: 788. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0602-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing interest in pay-for-performance and other quality improvement programs has generated concerns about potential performance measurement penalties for providers who care for more complex patients, such as patients with more chronic conditions. Few data are available on how multimorbidity affects common performance metrics.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between multimorbidity and patients’ ratings of communication, a common performance metric.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study

SETTING

Nationally representative sample of U.S. residents

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 15,709 noninstitutionalized adults living in the United States participated in a telephone interview.

MEASUREMENTS

We used 2 different measures of multimorbidity: 1) “individual conditions” approach disregards similarities/concordance among chronic conditions and 2) “condition-groups” approach considers similarities/concordance among conditions. We used a composite measure of patients’ ratings of patient–physician communication.

RESULTS

A higher number of individual conditions is associated with lower ratings of communication, although the magnitude of the relationship is small (adjusted average communication scores: 0 conditions, 12.20; 1–2 conditions, 12.06; 3+ conditions, 11.90; scale range 5 = worst, 15 = best). This relationship remains statistically significant when concordant relationships among conditions are considered (0 condition groups 12.19; 1–2 condition groups 12.03; 3+ condition groups 11.94).

CONCLUSIONS

In our nationally representative sample, patients with more chronic conditions gave their doctors modestly lower patient–doctor communication scores than their healthier counterparts. Accounting for concordance among conditions does not widen the difference in communication scores. Concerns about performance measurement penalty related to patient complexity cannot be entirely addressed by adjusting for multimorbidity. Future studies should focus on other aspects of clinical complexity (e.g., severity, specific combinations of conditions).

KEY WORDS

multimorbiditypay-for-performancepatient–physician communication

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constance H. Fung
    • 1
    • 4
  • Claude M. Setodji
    • 2
  • Fuan-Yue Kung
    • 2
  • Joan Keesey
    • 2
  • Steven M. Asch
    • 2
    • 3
  • John Adams
    • 2
  • Elizabeth A. McGlynn
    • 2
  1. 1.Zynx Health, IncorporatedLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.RANDSanta MonicaUSA
  3. 3.VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Los AngelesUSA