Variation in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic Practices: Assessing Practice Environments and Quality of Care
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Few studies have systematically and rigorously examined the quality of care provided in educational practice sites.
The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the patient population cared for by trainees in internal medicine residency clinics; (2) assess the quality of preventive cardiology care provided to these patients; (3) characterize the practice-based systems that currently exist in internal medicine residency clinics; and (4) examine the relationships between quality, practice-based systems, and features of the program: size, type of program, and presence of an electronic medical record.
This is a cross-sectional observational study.
This study was conducted in 15 Internal Medicine residency programs (23 sites) throughout the USA.
The participants included site champions at residency programs and 709 residents.
Abstracted charts provided data about patient demographics, coronary heart disease risk factors, processes of care, and clinical outcomes. Patients completed surveys regarding satisfaction. Site teams completed a practice systems survey.
Chart abstraction of 4,783 patients showed substantial variability across sites. On average, patients had between 3 and 4 of the 9 potential risk factors for coronary heart disease, and approximately 21% had at least 1 important barrier of care. Patients received an average of 57% (range, 30–77%) of the appropriate interventions. Reported satisfaction with care was high. Sites with an electronic medical record showed better overall information management (81% vs 27%) and better modes of communication (79% vs 43%).
This study has provided insight into the current state of practice in residency sites including aspects of the practice environment and quality of preventive cardiology care delivered. Substantial heterogeneity among the training sites exists. Continuous measurement of the quality of care provided and a better understanding of the training environment in which this care is delivered are important goals for delivering high quality patient care.
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web Site. Available at http://www.acgme.org. Accessed April 15, 2006.
- American Board of Internal Medicine Web Site. Available at http://www.abim.org. Accessed May 26, 2006.
- Bowen, JL, Salerno, SM, Chamberlain, JK, Eckstrom, E, Chen, HL, Bandenburg, S (2005) Changing habits of practice: Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings. J Gen Intern Med 20: pp. 1181-1187 CrossRef
- Holmboe, ES, Bowen, JD, Green, M, Gregg, J, DiFrancesco, L, Reynolds, E, Alguire, P, Battinelli, B, Lucey, C, Duffy, FD (2005) Reforming internal medicine residency training: a report from the Society of General Internal Medicine’s task force for residency reform. J Gen Intern Med 20: pp. 1165-1172 CrossRef
- Fitzgibbons, JP, Bordley, DR, Berkowitz, LR, Miller, BW, Henderson, MC (2006) Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 144: pp. 920-926
- Weinberger, SE, Smith, LG, Collier, VU (2006) Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 144: pp. 927-932
- Charlson, ME, Karnik, J, Wong, M, McCulloch, CE, Hollenberg, JP (2005) Does experience matter? A comparison of the practice of attendings and residents. J Gen Intern Med 20: pp. 497-503 CrossRef
- Kogan, JR, Reynolds, EE, Shea, JA (2003) Effect of report cards based on chart audits of residents’ adherence to practice guidelines on practice performance: a randomized controlled trial. Teach Learn Med 15: pp. 25-30 CrossRef
- Holmboe, ES, Prince, L, Green, ML (2005) Teaching and improving quality of care in a residency clinic. Acad Med 80: pp. 571-577 CrossRef
- Veloski, J, Boex, JR, Grasberger, MJ, Evans, A, Wolfson, DB (2006) Systematic review of the literature on the impact of assessment and feedback on physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teacher 28: pp. 117-128 CrossRef
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web Site. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines. Accessed April 15, 2006.
- American College of Cardiology, Clinical Statements and Practice Guidelines. Available at http://www.acc.org. Accessed June 22, 2006.
- Lakka, HM, Lakka, TA, Tuomilehto, J, Salonen, JT (2002) Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of acute coronary events in men. Eur Heart J 23: pp. 706-713 CrossRef
- Kanaya, AM, Vittinghoff, E, Shlipak, MG, Resnick, HE, Visser, M, Grady, D, Barrett-Conner, E (2003) Association of total and central obesity with mortality in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol 158: pp. 1161-1170 CrossRef
- Rosenthal, GE, Shannon, SE (1997) The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care 35: pp. NS58-NS68 CrossRef
- Annual Report of the National CAHPS® Benchmarking Database, 2000 Annual Report. What consumers say about the quality of their health plans and medical care. Available at http://ncbd.cahps.org/Annual_Report/NCBDrepa.htm. Accessed May 22, 2006.
- Wagner, EH, Austin, BT, Korff, M (1996) Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Millbank Q 74: pp. 511-544 CrossRef
- Moen, R (2002) A Guide to Idealized Design. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA
- Put Prevention into Practice: Education and Action Kit. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
- Duffy FD, Lynn L, Didura H, Hess BJ, Caverzagie K, Grosso LJ, Lipner RS, Holmboe ES. Self Assessment of Practice Performance: Development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Cont Educ Health Prof. In press.
- Center for Study Health System Change. Available at http://www.hschange.com. Accessed May 22, 2006.
- Kilo, CM (2005) Transforming care: Medical practice design and information technology. Health Affairs 24: pp. 1296-1301 CrossRef
- Gans, D, Kralewski, J, Hammons, T, Dowd, B (2005) Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Affairs 24: pp. 1323-1333 CrossRef
- Audet, AM, Doty, MM, Peugh, J, Shamasdin, J, Zapert, K, Schoenbaum, S (2004) Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians’ black bags?. Med Gen Med 6: pp. 2
- Amalberti, R, Auroy, Y, Berwick, D, Barach, P (2005) Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care. Ann Intern Med 142: pp. 756-764
- Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC
- Audet, AMJ, Doty, MM, Shamasdin, J, Schoenbaum, SC (2005) Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Affairs 24: pp. 843-853 CrossRef
- McGlynn, EA, Asch, SM, Adams, J, Keesy, J, Hicks, J, DeCristofaro, A (2003) Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348: pp. 2635-2645 CrossRef
- Nolan, T, Berwick, DM (2006) All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA 295: pp. 1168-1170 CrossRef
- Holmboe, ES, Meehan, TP, Lynn, L, Doyle, P, Sherwin, T, Duffy, FD (2006) The ABIM diabetes practice improvement module: A new method for self assessment. J Cont Educ Health Prof 26: pp. 109-119 CrossRef
- Variation in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic Practices: Assessing Practice Environments and Quality of Care
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 7 , pp 914-920
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- practice-based learning
- systems-based practice
- quality of care
- preventive cardiology
- Internal Medicine residency
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
- 2. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3. American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA