Electronic Result Viewing and Quality of Care in Small Group Practices
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of commercially available electronic systems for improving health care in office practices, where the majority of health care is delivered. In particular, the effect of electronic laboratory result viewing on quality of care, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and patient satisfaction, is unclear.
To determine whether electronic laboratory result viewing is associated with higher ambulatory care quality.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the Taconic IPA in New York, all of whom have the opportunity to use a free-standing electronic portal for laboratory result viewing. We analyzed 15 quality measures, reflecting preventive care, chronic disease management, and patient satisfaction, which were collected in 2005. Using generalized estimating equations, we determined associations between portal usage and quality, adjusting for adoption of electronic health records and 10 other physician characteristics, including case mix.
One-third of physicians (54/168, 32%) used the portal at least once over a 6-month period. Use of the portal was associated with higher quality overall (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003, 1.57). In stratified analyses, portal usage was associated with higher quality on those performance measures expected to be impacted by result viewing (adjusted OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.00, 1.81; p = 0.05), but not associated with quality for measures not expected to be impacted by result viewing (adjusted OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.72, 1.48; p = 0.85).
Electronic laboratory result viewing was independently associated with higher ambulatory care quality. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this association.
- American Medical Association. Physicians in the United States and Possessions by selected characteristics. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/images/373/internettable.gif. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007.
- Jha, AK, Ferris, TG, Donelan, K (2006) How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 25: pp. w496-w507 CrossRef
- Poon, EG, Gandhi, TK, Sequist, TD, Murff, HJ, Karson, AS, Bates, DW (2004) “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!”: dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med 164: pp. 2223-2228 CrossRef
- Blumenthal, D, Glaser, JP (2007) Information technology comes to medicine. N Engl J Med 356: pp. 2527-2534 CrossRef
- Halamka, JD (2006) Health information technology: shall we wait for the evidence?. Ann Intern Med 144: pp. 775-776
- Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology. Available at: http://www.healthit.ahrq.gov. Accessibility verified October 11, 2007.
- Foundation of Research and Education of American Health Information Management Association. State level health information exchange initiative development workbook: a guide to key issues, options and strategies. Chicago; 2006. Available at: http://www.staterhio.org. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007.
- Evolution of state health information exchange: a study of vision, strategy and progress (AHRQ publication No. 06-0057). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
- New York State Department of Health. Health Information Technology Grants - HEAL NY Phase 1. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/technology/awards. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007.
- Simon, SR, Kaushal, R, Cleary, PD (2007) Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14: pp. 110-117 CrossRef
- Chaudhry, B, Wang, J, Wu, S (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 144: pp. 742-752
- Bates, DW, Kuperman, GJ, Rittenberg, E (1999) A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. Am J Med 106: pp. 144-150 CrossRef
- Kuperman, GJ, Teich, JM, Tanasijevic, MJ (1999) Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6: pp. 512-522
- Stair, TO (1998) Reduction of redundant laboratory orders by access to computerized patient records. J Emerg Med 16: pp. 895-897 CrossRef
- Tierney, WM, McDonald, CJ, Martin, DK, Rogers, MP (1987) Computerized display of past test results: effect on outpatient testing. Ann Intern Med 107: pp. 569-574
- Garr, DR, Ornstein, SM, Jenkins, RG, Zemp, LD (1993) The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice. Am J Prev Med 9: pp. 55-61
- Litzelman, DK, Dittus, RS, Miller, ME, Tierney, WM (1993) Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J Gen Intern Med 8: pp. 311-317 CrossRef
- McDonald, CJ, Hui, SL, Smith, DM (1984) Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record: a two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 100: pp. 130-138
- McDonald, CJ, Hui, SL, Tierney, WM (1992) Effects of computer reminders for influenza vaccination on morbidity during influenza epidemics. MD Comput 9: pp. 304-312
- Ornstein, SM, Garr, DR, Jenkins, RG, Musham, C, Hamadeh, G, Lancaster, C (1995) Implementation and evaluation of a computer-based preventive services system. Fam Med 27: pp. 260-266
- Tierney, WM, Hui, SL, McDonald, CJ (1986) Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care: effects on physician compliance. Med Care 24: pp. 659-666 CrossRef
- Demakis, JG, Beauchamp, C, Cull, WL, Denwood, R, Eisen, SA, Lofgren, R (2000) Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. JAMA 284: pp. 1411-1416 CrossRef
- Rollman, BL, Hanusa, BH, Gilbert, T, Lowe, HJ, Kapoor, WN, Schulberg, HC (2001) The electronic medical record: a randomized trial of its impact on primary care physicians' initial management of major depression. Arch Intern Med 161: pp. 189-197 CrossRef
- Rollman, BL, Hanusa, BH, Lowe, HJ, Gilbert, T, Kapoor, WN, Schulberg, HC (2002) A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 17: pp. 493-503 CrossRef
- Rossi, RA, Every, NR (1997) A computerized intervention to decrease the use of calcium channel blockers in hypertension. J Gen Intern Med 12: pp. 672-678 CrossRef
- Safran, C, Rind, DM, Davis, RB (1995) Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient’s record. Lancet 346: pp. 341-346 CrossRef
- Simon, GE, VonKorff, M, Rutter, C, Wagner, E (2000) Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ 320: pp. 550-554 CrossRef
- U.S. News & World Report. Best health plans 2006. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/health/best-health-insurance/Commercial/dir_242.htm. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007.
- DxCG. Available at: http://www.dxcg.com. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007.
- Ash, AS, Ellis, RP, Pope, GC (2000) Using diagnoses to describe populations and predict costs. Health Care Financ Rev 21: pp. 7-28
- Berwick, DM (2003) Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 289: pp. 1969-1975 CrossRef
- Rogers, EM (2003) Innovativeness and adopter categories. In: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York
- Wiest, FC, Ferris, TG, Gokhale, M (2002) Preparedness of internal medicine and family practice residents for treating common conditions. JAMA 288: pp. 2609-2614 CrossRef
- Sharp, LK, Bashook, PG, Lipsky, MS, Horowitz, SD, Miller, SH (2002) Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link. Acad Med 77: pp. 534-542 CrossRef
- McGlynn, EA, Asch, SM, Adams, J (2003) The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348: pp. 2635-2645 CrossRef
- Saaddine, JB, Cadwell, B, Gregg, EW (2006) Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988–2002. Ann Intern Med 144: pp. 465-474
- Institute of Medicine. Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10781. Accessibility verified October 12, 2007
- Electronic Result Viewing and Quality of Care in Small Group Practices
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 4 , pp 405-410
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- health information technology
- health information exchange
- quality of health care
- laboratory results
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- 3. New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- 4. Taconic IPA, Fishkill, NY, USA
- 5. MedAllies, Fishkill, NY, USA
- 6. MVP Health Care, Schenectady, NY, USA
- 7. Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA