Simulation Technology for Skills Training and Competency Assessment in Medical Education
Medical education during the past decade has witnessed a significant increase in the use of simulation technology for teaching and assessment. Contributing factors include: changes in health care delivery and academic environments that limit patient availability as educational opportunities; worldwide attention focused on the problem of medical errors and the need to improve patient safety; and the paradigm shift to outcomes-based education with its requirements for assessment and demonstration of competence. The use of simulators addresses many of these issues: they can be readily available at any time and can reproduce a wide variety of clinical conditions on demand. In lieu of the customary (and arguably unethical) system, whereby novices carry out the practice required to master various techniques—including invasive procedures—on real patients, simulation-based education allows trainees to hone their skills in a risk-free environment. Evaluators can also use simulators for reliable assessments of competence in multiple domains. For those readers less familiar with medical simulators, this article aims to provide a brief overview of these educational innovations and their uses; for decision makers in medical education, we hope to broaden awareness of the significant potential of these new technologies for improving physician training and assessment, with a resultant positive impact on patient safety and health care outcomes.
- Reznek MA. Current status of simulation in education and research. In: Loyd GE, Lake CL, Greenberg RB, eds. Practical Health Care Simulations. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004:27–47.
- McGaghie WC. Simulation in professional competence assessment: basic considerations. In: Tekian A, McGuire CH, McGaghie WC, eds. Innovative Simulations for Assessing Professional Competence. Chicago: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1999:7–22.
- Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999;282(9):861–6. CrossRef
- Fincher R-ME, Lewis LA. Simulations used to teach clinical skills. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:499–535.
- Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 13: real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach 1998;20:508–21. CrossRef
- Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
- An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer (Accessed 5 Dec 2006, at http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4065083&chk=PARoiF).
- Barach P. Delivering safe health care: safety is a patient’s right and the obligation of all health professionals. BMJ 2001;323:585–6. CrossRef
- Goodman W. The world of civil simulators. Flight Intl 1978;18:435.
- Ressler EK, Armstrong JE, Forsythe GB, Tekian A, McGuire C, McGaghie WC. Military mission rehearsal: from sandtable to virtual reality. In: Innovative Simulations for the Evaluation of Professional Competence. Chicago: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois Medical Center; 1999.
- Wachtel J, Walton DG. The future of nuclear power plant simulation in the United States. In: Simulation for Nuclear Reactor Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
- Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21(3):251–6. CrossRef
- Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27(1):10–28. CrossRef
- Kochevar DT. The critical role of outcomes assessment in veterinary medical accreditation. J Vet Med Educ 2004;31(2):116–9. CrossRef
- Scalese RJ, Issenberg SB. Effective use of simulations for the teaching and acquisition of veterinary professional and clinical skills. J Vet Med Educ 2005;32(4):461–7. CrossRef
- Langsley DG. Medical competence and performance assessment. A new era. JAMA 1991;266(7):977–80. CrossRef
- Norcini J. Computer-based testing will soon be a reality. Perspectives 1999;3.
- Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students’ clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med 1999;74(7):842–9. CrossRef
- Edelstein RA, Reid HM, Usatine R, Wilkes MS. A comparative study of measures to evaluate medical students’ performance. Acad Med 2000;75(8):825–33. CrossRef
- Swing SR. Assessing the ACGME general competencies: general considerations and assessment methods. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9(11):1278–88. CrossRef
- Medical Council of Canada. Qualifying Examination Part II, Information Pamphlet. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Medical Council of Canada; 2002.
- Ben David MF, Klass DJ, Boulet J, et al. The performance of foreign medical graduates on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) standardized patient examination prototype: a collaborative study of the NBME and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG). Med Educ 1999;33(6):439–46. CrossRef
- Hatala R, Kassen BO, Nishikawa J, Cole G, Issenberg SB. Incorporating simulation technology in a Canadian internal medicine specialty examination: a descriptive report. Acad Med 2005;80(6):554–6. CrossRef
- The ACGME Outcome Project: General Competencies. (Accessed 5 Dec 2006, at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp).
- Kneebone RL, Kidd J, Nestel D, et al. Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting. Med Educ 2005;39(6):580–7. CrossRef
- Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63–S67. CrossRef
- ACGME Outcome Project: Table of Toolbox Methods. (Accessed 5 Dec 2006, at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/table.asp).
- ABIM Maintenance of Certification Program. (Accessed 1 December, 2006, at http://www.abim.org/moc/semmed.shtm#5).
- Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236(4):458-63; discussion 63–4. CrossRef
- Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004;91(2):146–50. CrossRef
- Simulation Technology for Skills Training and Competency Assessment in Medical Education
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 1 Supplement, pp 46-49
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- medical education
- simulation technology
- competency assessment
- Industry Sectors