Are Physicians Discussing Prostate Cancer Screening with Their Patients and Why or Why Not? A Pilot Study
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Prostate cancer screening (PCS) is controversial. Ideally, patients should understand the risks and benefits of screening before undergoing PSA testing. This study assessed whether primary care physicians routinely discuss PCS and explored the barriers to and facilitators of these discussions.
Qualitative pilot study involving in-depth, semistructured interviews with 18 purposively sampled, academic and community-based primary care physicians. Barriers and facilitators of PCS discussions were ascertained using both interviews and chart-stimulated recall—a technique utilizing patient charts to probe recall and provide context to physician decision-making during clinic encounters. Analysis was performed using consensus conferences based on grounded theory techniques.
All 18 participating physicians reported that they generally discussed PCS with patients, though 6 reported sometimes ordering PSA tests without discussion. A PCS discussion occurred in only 16 (36%) of the 44 patient–physician encounters when patients were due for PCS that also met criteria for chart-stimulated recall. Barriers to PCS discussion were patient comorbidity, limited education/health literacy, prior refusal of care, physician forgetfulness, acute-care visits, and lack of time. Facilitators of PCS discussion included patient-requested screening, highly educated patients, family history of prostate cancer, African-American race, visits for routine physicals, review of previous PSA results, extra time during encounters, and reminder systems.
PCS discussions sometimes do not occur. Important barriers to discussion are inadequate time for health maintenance, physician forgetfulness, and patient characteristics. Future research should explore using educational and decision support interventions to involve more patients in PCS decisions.
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43–66.
- AAFP. Summary of Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2005.
- American Urological Association. Executive Committee Report: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. Baltimore: American Urological Association; 1997.
- Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(1):27–43.
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(4):787–92.
- American College of Physicians. Clinical guideline, Part III: screening for prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(6):480–4.
- Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan EC, Woolf SH. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer. 2004;214–28 Sep 1.
- Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Fahs MC, Mulley AG. Early detection of prostate cancer, II: estimating the risks, benefits and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:468–79.
- Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Mulley AG. Early detection of prostate cancer, I: prior probability and effectiveness of tests. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:394–406.
- Han PK, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N. Decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(5):394–404.
- Chan EC, Vernon SW, Ahn C, Greisinger A. Do men know that they have had a prostate-specific antigen test? Accuracy of self-reports of testing at 2 sites. Am J Publ Health. 2005;94(8):1336–8. CrossRef
- Jordan TR, Price JH, King KA, Masyk T, Bedell AW. The validity of male patients’ self-reports regarding prostate cancer screening. Prev Med. 1999;28(3):297–303.
- Walsh JM, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:157–75.
- Maatsch JL. Predictive Validity of Medical Specialty Examinations. Final report to NCHSR Grant No.: HS02039-04; 1983.
- Jannett PA, Affleck L. Chart audit and chart stimulated recall as methods of needs assessment in continuing professional health education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1998;18:163–71.
- Bridgham RG, Munger B, Reinhart MA, Keefe C, Maatsch JL. The impact of communication between physician and evaluator on assessments of clinical performance. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of Research in Medical Education, 1988. Washington DC: American Association of Medical Colleges; 1988.
- Huang RR, Maatsch JL, Downing SM, Barker D. Reliability and validity of ratings of physician performance. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of Research in Medical Education, 1984. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Medical Colleges; 1984.
- Munger BS, Reinhart MA. Field trial of multiple recertification methods. In: Lloyd JS, Langsley DG, eds. Recertification for Medical Specialists. Evanston, IL: American Board of Medical Specialties; 1987:71–88.
- Sirovich BE, Schwartz L, Woloshin S. Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:1414–20.
- Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Prostate Cancer Early Detection. V.1.2006. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate_detection.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2007. In; 2006.
- Kravitz R, Rolph J, Petersen L. Omission-related malpractice claims and the limits of defensive medicine. Med Care Res Rev. 1997;54(4):456–71.
- Hayward R, Asch S, Hogan M, Hofer T, Kerr E. Sins of omission: getting too little medical care may be the greatest threat to patient safety. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):686–91.
- Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To Err Is Human: Building A Safer Health System. Washington, DC; 2000.
- Austin S, Balas E, Mitchell J, Ewigman B. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. In: Ozbolt JG, ed. Proceedings for 18th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1994. Washington, DC. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1994:121–24.
- Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahsmonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3:399–409.
- Hales B, Pronovost P. The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):231–5.
- Charlton J. Checklists and patient safety. Anaesthesia. 1990;45(6):425–6.
- Dunn AS, Shridharani KV, Lou W, Bernstein J, Horowitz CR. Physician–patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(2):130–4.
- Purvis Cooper C, Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CM. To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians’ use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):182–91.
- Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13(1):1–10.
- Schoenfeld P. Flexible sigmoidoscopy by paramedical personnel. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;28(2):110–6.
- McPhee SJ, Richard RJ, Solkowitz SN. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.
- Romm FJ, Hulka BS, Kelly LW Jr. Internists’ perceptions and performance in office practice. South Med J. 1980;73(4):405–14.
- Wu L, Ashton CM. Chart review. A need for reappraisal. Eval Health Prof. 1997;20:146–63.
- Rethans JJ, Martin E, Metsemakers J. To what extend do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:153–6.
- Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes and the medical record. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;12:782–88.
- Kogan JR, Reynolds EE, Shea JA. Resident and faculty adherence to common guidelines. Acad Med. 2001;S27–9.
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health Care System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Press; 2001.
- Are Physicians Discussing Prostate Cancer Screening with Their Patients and Why or Why Not? A Pilot Study
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 22, Issue 7 , pp 901-907
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- prostate-specific antigen
- prostate cancer screening
- mass screening
- physician practice patterns
- physician–patient relations
- communication barriers
- informed decision making
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 1221 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- 2. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA