Measuring Safety Culture in the Ambulatory Setting: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—Ambulatory Version
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Provider attitudes about issues pertinent to patient safety may be related to errors and adverse events. We know of no instruments that measure safety-related attitudes in the outpatient setting.
To adapt the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) to the outpatient setting and compare attitudes among different types of providers in the outpatient setting.
We modified the SAQ to create a 62-item SAQ—ambulatory version (SAQ-A). Patient care staff in a multispecialty, academic practice rated their agreement with the items using a 5-point Likert scale. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to determine reliability of scale scores. Differences in SAQ-A scores between providers were assessed using ANOVA.
Of the 409 staff, 282 (69%) returned surveys. One hundred ninety (46%) surveys were included in the analyses. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.68 to 0.86 for the scales: teamwork climate, safety climate, perceptions of management, job satisfaction, working conditions, and stress recognition. Physicians had the least favorable attitudes about perceptions of management while managers had the most favorable attitudes (mean scores: 50.4 ± 22.5 vs 72.5 ± 19.6, P < 0.05; percent with positive attitudes 18% vs 70%, respectively). Nurses had the most positive stress recognition scores (mean score 66.0 ± 24.0). All providers had similar attitudes toward teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, and working conditions.
The SAQ-A is a reliable tool for eliciting provider attitudes about the ambulatory work setting. Attitudes relevant to medical error may differ among provider types and reflect behavior and clinic operations that could be improved.
- Hammons T, Piland NF, Small SD, Hatlie MJ, Burstin HR. Ambulatory patient safety. What we know and need to know. J Ambul Care Manage. 2003 Jan–Mar;26(1):63–82.
- Gandhi TK, Sitting DF, Franklin M, et al. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:626–31. CrossRef
- Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Leape LL, et al. Medication errors and potential adverse drug events among out patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(Suppl.):116–116. CrossRef
- Gandhi TK, Burstin HR, Cook EF, et al. Drug complications in outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:149–54. CrossRef
- Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ. 2000;320:774–77. CrossRef
- Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1556–64. CrossRef
- Helmreich RL. Cockpit management attitudes. Hum Factors 1984;26(5):583–89.
- Helmreich RL. Preliminary results from the evaluation of cockpit resource management training: Performance ratings of flight crews. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990;61:576–79.
- Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Errors, stress and teamwork in medicine and aviation cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320:745–49. CrossRef
- Thomas EJ, Sexton BJ, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:956–59. CrossRef
- Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, et al. The safety attitudes questionnaire: Psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res, 2006;6:44. CrossRef
- Frankel A, Graydon-Baker E, Neppl C, Simmonds T, Gustafson M, Gandhi TK. Patient safety leadership WalkRounds. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Jan;29(1):16–26.
- Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Neilands TB, Frankel A, Helmreich RL. The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes. A randomized trial of clinical units. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:28. CrossRef
- Singer SJ, Gaba DM, Geppert JJ, Sinaiko AD, Howard SK, Park KC. The culture of safety: results of an organization-wide survey in 15 California hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:112–8. CrossRef
- Weingart SN, Farbstein K, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Using a multihospital survey to examine the safety culture. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:125–32.
- Sorra JS, Nieva VF. Hospital survey on patient safety culture. (Prepared by Westat, under Contract No. 290-96-0004). AHRQ Publication No. 04-0041. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. September 2004.
- Colla JB, Bracken AC, Kinney LM, Weeks WB. Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:364–66. CrossRef
- Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3:4–69. CrossRef
- Pronovost P, Weast B, Rosenstein G, et al. Implementing and validating and comprehensive, unit-based safety program. J Patient Saf. 2005;1(1):33–40.
- National Quality Forum. Safe Practices for Better Health Care: A Consensus Report. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2003.
- Safety Climate Survey (IHI Tool), http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/PatientSafety/SafetyGeneral/Tools/Safety+Climate+Survey+%28IHI+Tool%29.htm, accessed 11/18/05
- Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291:1246–51. CrossRef
- Measuring Safety Culture in the Ambulatory Setting: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—Ambulatory Version
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 22, Issue 1 , pp 1-5
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- adverse events
- safety attitudes
- safety attitudes questionnaire
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
- 2. Department of Psychology, The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project, Austin, TX, USA
- 3. UT Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 1.122, Houston, TX, 77030, USA