Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 332–337

Specificity of Clinical Breast Examination in Community Practice

  • Joshua J. Fenton
  • Sharon J. Rolnick
  • Emily L. Harris
  • Mary B. Barton
  • William E. Barlow
  • Lisa M. Reisch
  • Lisa J. Herrinton
  • Ann M. Geiger
  • Suzanne W. Fletcher
  • Joann G. Elmore
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-006-0062-7

Cite this article as:
Fenton, J.J., Rolnick, S.J., Harris, E.L. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2007) 22: 332. doi:10.1007/s11606-006-0062-7

Background

Millions of women receive clinical breast examination (CBE) each year, as either a breast cancer screening test or a diagnostic test for breast symptoms. While screening CBE had moderately high specificity (∼94%) in clinical trials, community clinicians may be comparatively inexperienced and may conduct relatively brief examinations, resulting in even higher specificity but lower sensitivity.

Objective

To estimate the specificity of screening and diagnostic CBE in clinical practice and identify patient factors associated with specificity.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects

Breast-cancer-free female health plan enrollees in 5 states (WA, OR, CA, MA, and MN) who received CBE (N = 1,484).

Measurements

Medical charts were abstracted to ascertain breast cancer risk factors, examination purpose (screening vs diagnostic), and results (true-negative vs false-positive). Women were considered “average-risk” if they had neither a family history of breast cancer nor a prior breast biopsy and “increased-risk” otherwise.

Results

Among average- and increased-risk women, respectively, the specificity (true-negative proportion) of screening CBE was 99.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98.8–99.7%] and 97.1% (95% CI: 95.7–98.0%), and the specificity of diagnostic CBE was 68.7% (95% CI: 59.7–76.5%) and 57.1% (95% CI: 51.1–63.0%). The odds of a true-negative screening CBE (specificity) were significantly lower among women at increased risk of breast cancer (adjusted odds ratio 0.21; 95% CI: 0.10–0.46).

Conclusions

Screening CBE likely has higher specificity among community clinicians compared to examiners in clinical trials of breast cancer screening, even among women at increased breast cancer risk. Highly specific examinations, however, may have relatively low sensitivity for breast cancer. Diagnostic CBE, meanwhile, is relatively nonspecific.

Key Words

breast cancersensitivity and specificityscreeningphysical examination

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua J. Fenton
    • 1
  • Sharon J. Rolnick
    • 2
  • Emily L. Harris
    • 3
  • Mary B. Barton
    • 4
  • William E. Barlow
    • 5
  • Lisa M. Reisch
    • 6
  • Lisa J. Herrinton
    • 7
  • Ann M. Geiger
    • 8
  • Suzanne W. Fletcher
    • 4
  • Joann G. Elmore
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of California, DavisSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Health PartnersSouth MinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Kaiser Permanente Center for Health ResearchPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ambulatory Care and PreventionHarvard Pilgrim HealthcareBostonUSA
  5. 5.Cancer Research and BiostatisticsSeattleUSA
  6. 6.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  7. 7.Division of ResearchNorthern California Kaiser PermanenteOaklandUSA
  8. 8.Department of Public Health SciencesWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA