Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania: Results of a Faculty Survey
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Research suggests mentoring is related to career satisfaction and success. Most studies have focused on junior faculty.
To explore multiple aspects of mentoring at an academic medical center in relation to faculty rank, track, and gender.
Cross-sectional mail survey in mid-2003.
Faculty members, 1,432, at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Self-administered survey developed from existing instruments and stakeholders.
Response rate was 73% (n = 1,046). Most (92%) assistant and half (48%) of associate professors had a mentor. Assistant professors in the tenure track were most likely to have a mentor (98%). At both ranks, the faculty was given more types of advice than types of opportunities. Satisfaction with mentoring was correlated with the number of types of mentoring received (r = .48 and .53, P < .0001), job satisfaction (r = .44 and .31, P < .0001), meeting frequency (r = .53 and .61, P < .0001), and expectation of leaving the University within 5 years (Spearman r = −.19 and −.18, P < .0001), at the assistant and associate rank, respectively. Significant predictors of higher overall job satisfaction were associate rank [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.04, CI = 1.29–3.21], the 10-point mentoring satisfaction rating (OR = 1.27, CI = 1.17–1.35), and number of mentors (OR = 1.60, CI = 1.20–2.07).
Having a mentor, or preferably, multiple mentors is strongly related to satisfaction with mentoring and overall job satisfaction. Surprisingly, few differences were related to gender. Mentoring of clinician–educators, research track faculty, and senior faculty, and the use of multiple mentors require specific attention of academic leadership and further study.
- Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154:423–6.
- Palepu A, Friedman, RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318–23. CrossRef
- Ramanan R, Phillips R, Davis R, et al. Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction. Am J Med. 2002;112:336–41. CrossRef
- Fried, LP, Francomano, CA, MacDonald SM, et al. Career development for women in academic medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:898–905. CrossRef
- Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, et al. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34. CrossRef
- Bhagia J, Tinsley JA. The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:535–7.
- Pololi LH, Knight SM, Dennis K, Frankel RM. Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Acad Med. 2002;77:377–84. CrossRef
- Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):66–71. CrossRef
- Bakken LL. Who are physician–scientists’ role models? Gender makes a difference. Acad Med. 2005;80(5):502–6. CrossRef
- Wise MR, Shapiro H, Bodley J, Pittini R, McKay D, Willan A, Hannah ME. Factors affecting academic promotion in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(2):127–36.
- Bellini L, Abbuhl S, Grisso JA, et al. Stresses and workplace resources for academic junior faculty: track and gender comparisons. Acad Med. 2001;76:S62–4. CrossRef
- Foster, SW, McMurray, JE, Linzer, M, et al. Results of a gender–climate and work-environment survey at a midwestern academic health center. Acad Med. 2000;75:653–60. CrossRef
- Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, et al. Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79:258–64. CrossRef
- Howell LP, Bertakis KD. Clinical faculty tracks and academic success at the University of California medical schools. Acad Med. 2004;79:250–7. CrossRef
- Rabatin JS, Lipkin M Jr, Rubin AS, Schachter A, Nathan M, Kalet A. A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of fifteen hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 2):569–73. CrossRef
- Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania: Results of a Faculty Survey
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 22, Issue 2 , pp 210-214
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- faculty mentoring
- faculty development
- career satisfaction
- Industry Sectors