Date: 08 Sep 2010
The Effect of Surgical Volume and the Provision of Residency and Fellowship Training on Complications of Major Hepatic Resection
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Positive volume–outcomes relationships have been demonstrated for hepatic resection using arbitrary criteria to define high-volume centers. The safety of training programs has not been evaluated. The association of surgical volume, as a continuous variable and the influence of a surgical residency and a fellowship program on outcomes after major hepatectomy were determined.
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried from 1998 to 2006. Quantification of patients’ comorbidities was made using the Charlson index, and mortality, and complication rates were determined. Institutions’ annual case volumes were correlated with risk-adjusted outcomes over time, as well as presence or absence of residency or fellowship training program using logistic regression modeling.
A total of 5,298 major hepatectomies were recorded, representing a weighted nationwide total of 26,396 cases. In-hospital unadjusted mortality for the study period was 6%. Adjusting for comorbidities, greater major hepatectomy volume was associated with improvements in the incidence of most measured complications, with plateauing of mortality of between 2% and 3% at approximately 50 cases per year. The mortality rate increased once greater than approximately 70 cases were performed per annum. Hospitals supporting a surgical residency program had lower overall morbidity and mortality. A fellowship program however was not associated with overall lower morbidity and mortality and appeared to result in a higher rate of certain complications.
Greater annual major hepatectomy volume improves outcomes with reduced mortality up to a certain point. The presence of surgical residency program but not a fellowship program is associated with reduced predicted morbidity and mortality.
Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, et al. Hospital mortality of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis. Arch Surg 1995; 130(2):198–203.PubMed
HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 1998–2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 11 September 2008.
International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) Fellowship Registry. Available at: http://www.ihpba.org/fellowship-reg-zone1.html. Accessed 11 September 2008.
The Fellowship Council website. Directory of Fellowships. Available at: https://fellowshipcouncil.org/directory/browse2.php. Accessed 11 September 2008.
Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) training programs. Available at: http://www.surgonc.org/default.aspx?id = 60. Accessed 11 September 2008.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/adspublic/. Access 26 November 2008.
American Medical Association website. FREIDA Online GME program search results. Available at: https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/user/programSearchSubmitDispatch.do. Accessed 26 November 2008.
Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Overby DW, et al. Volume-outcome relationships and other influences of outcome in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(S1):149.
Finlayson SR. The volume-outcome debate revisited. Am Surg 2006; 72(11):1038–42; discussion 1061-9, 1133-48.PubMed
- The Effect of Surgical Volume and the Provision of Residency and Fellowship Training on Complications of Major Hepatic Resection
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 12 , pp 1981-1989
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Major hepatectomy
- Surgical volume
- Charlson index
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Monash University, Maroondah Hospital, 1 Davey Drive Ringwood East, Victoria, 3135, Australia
- 2. University Department of Surgery, Austin Health, LTB 8, Studley Rd, Heidleberg, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia