Date: 02 Sep 2009
The National Mortality Burden and Significant Factors Associated with Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: 1997–2006
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study aims to determine the mortality rate and significant factors associated with laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomies (OC) over a 10-year period.
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we analyzed data for both LC and OC between 1997 and 2006. Cholecystectomies performed as part of another primary procedure were excluded. Using procedure-specific codes, we calculated annual national volumes for both open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies for the time period under review and the associated in-hospital mortality following both of these procedures. Using logistic regression modeling, we then analyzed selected patient and institutional characteristics to determine if a significant association existed between these factors and in-hospital mortality.
There was a 16% increase in the volume of LC and a corresponding decrease in open procedures over the 10 years under review. In 2006, 12% of cholecystectomies were still performed using an open approach and the associated mortality remained significantly higher than that seen with LC. Overall, after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, the mortality for OC was higher than that for LC (OR 4.57; 95% CI, 4.37–4.79, p < 0.001). Age (>60 years), male gender, non-elective admission, admission source, and a primary diagnosis other than cholelithiasis were all independently associated with increased mortality. The average mortality rate associated with conversion from LC to OC was found to be 0.7%.
These data indicate an increase in the proportion LCs performed over the years under study with a decrease in the proportion of OCs. However, OCs remain associated with a significant mortality burden when compared with the laparoscopic approach.
Presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 30 May–4 June 2009.
Orlando R 3rd, Russell JC, Lynch J, Mattie A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut laparoscopic cholecystectomy registry. Arch Surg 1993;128(5):494–498. discussion 498–9.PubMed
Sharp CF, Garza RZ, Mangram AJ, Dunn EL. Partial cholecystectomy in the setting of severe inflammation is an acceptable consideration with few long-term sequelae. Am Surg 2009;75(3):249–252.PubMed
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 1997–2006.
Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, et al. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203(5):723–728.CrossRefPubMed
Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E. Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 2001;67(7):637–640.PubMed
Ferreira MR, Bennett RL, Gilman SC, et al. Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Veterans Affairs health care system, 1991–1995. Eff Clin Pract 1999;2(2):49–55.PubMed
- The National Mortality Burden and Significant Factors Associated with Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: 1997–2006
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 12 , pp 2292-2301
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Open cholecystectomy
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Cholecystectomy mortality
- Mortality factors
- Industry Sectors