Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications Requiring Reoperation after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: 17 Years Experience in a Single Institute

  • original artilce
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Morbidity and mortality rates following gastric cancer surgery are still high. The present study documented complications requiring reoperation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and described surgical management for each complication.

Materials and Methods

Between 1987 and 2004, 8,033 patients underwent gastrectomy at the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and the records were reviewed.

Results and discussion

The most frequent complication was intestinal obstruction (88 patients, 54.3%), followed by intraabdominal bleeding (15, 9.3%), wound dehiscence or evisceration (15, 9.3%), incisional hernia (15, 9.3%), anastomotic leakage (seven, 4.2%), acalculous cholecystitis (five, 3.1%), duodenal stump leakage (five, 3.1%), intraabdominal abscess without leakage (five, 3.1%), bowel perforation (five, 3.1%), bile peritonitis due to hepatic duct injury (one, 0.6%), and biliary stricture (one, 0.6%). There were ten cases of hospital mortality (6.2%) from intraabdominal bleeding (four patients), intestinal obstruction (four patients), and anastomotic leakage (two patients). The most common long-term complication requiring reoperation was intestinal obstruction (69, 75.8%) due to adhesive formation rather than technical failure, while short-term complications were surgery-related and associated with high hospital mortality (14.1%).

Conclusion

Proper preoperative preparation and faultless surgical skills are required during initial surgery to reduce complications and the need for reoperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 8):S4–66. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00267-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995;345:745–748. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90637-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1996;347:995–999. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90144-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Neri A et al. Complications after extended (D2) and superextended (D3) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: analysis of potential risk factors. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:25–33. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9063-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH et al. Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2005;92:1099–1102. doi:10.1002/bjs.4952.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shchepotin IB, Evans SR, Chorny VA et al. Postoperative complications requiring relaparotomies after 700 gastretomies performed for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 1996;171:270–273. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89567-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476–1480. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chowbey PK, Panse R, Sharma A et al. Elective laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:416–22. doi:10.1097/01.sle.0000213746.92901.b4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Rashedy M, Issa ME, Ballester P, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic surgery for the management of obstruction of the gastric outlet and small bowel following previous laparotomy for major upper gastrointestinal resection or cancer palliation: a new concept. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:153–159. doi:10.1089/lap.2005.15.153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joo DJ, Kim SS, Choi WH et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction after radical gastrectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 2006;71(5):338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matory YL, Burt M. Esophagogastrectomy: reoperation for complications. J Surg Oncol 1993;54:29–33. doi:10.1002/jso.2930540109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kun L, Yun-Jie W, Qing-Shu C et al. Emergency re-operation for postoperative hemorrhage following partial esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia of the stomach. Dis Esophagus 2001;14:251–253. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00196.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer SC, Gorich J, Rilinger N et al. Embolization for gastrointestinal hemorrhages. Eur Radiol 2000;10:802–805. doi:10.1007/s003300051007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Juvonen T, Laitinen S. Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. Am J Surg 1995;170:387–390. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80309-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 1992;163:324–330. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(92)90014-I.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J 1982;284:931–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van’t RM, De Vos Van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ et al. Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors. Am Surg 2004;70:281–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucha PA Jr, Briscoe C, Brar H et al. Bursting strength evaluation in an experimental model of incisional hernia. Am Surg 2007;73:722–724.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koperna T, Schulz F. Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 2000;24:32–37. doi:10.1007/s002689910007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schurawitzki H, Karnel F, Stiglbauer R et al. CT-guided percutaneous drainage and fluid aspiration in intensive care patients. Acta Radiol 1992;33:131–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lambiase RE, Deyoe L, Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS. Percutaneous drainage of 335 consecutive abscesses: results of primary drainage with 1-year follow-up. Radiology 1992;184:167–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korean government (MOST) (R11-2000-082-02009-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Hoon Noh.

Additional information

This work was done through the Yonsei Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oh, S.J., Choi, W.B., Song, J. et al. Complications Requiring Reoperation after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: 17 Years Experience in a Single Institute. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 239–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0716-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0716-3

Keywords

Navigation