Laparoscopic-assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Outcomes from 121 Hospitals
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) and open colectomy (OC) have been shown to be generally comparable; however, differences in the occurrence of specific complications are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether certain complications occurred more frequently after LAC vs. OC for colon cancer.
Using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project’s (ACS-NSQIP) participant-use file, patients were identified who underwent colectomy for cancer at 121 participating hospitals in 2005–2006. Multiple logistic regression models including propensity scores were developed to assess the risk-adjusted association between surgical approach (LAC vs. OC) and 30-day outcomes. Patients were excluded if they underwent emergent procedures, were ASA class 5, or had metastatic disease.
Of the 3,059 patients who underwent elective colectomy for cancer, 837 (27.4%) underwent LAC and 2,222 (72.6%) underwent OC. There were no significant differences in age, comorbidities, ASA class, or body mass index (BMI) between patients undergoing LAC vs. OC. Patients undergoing LAC had a lower likelihood of developing any adverse event compared to OC (14.6% vs. 21.7%; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51–0.81, P < 0.0001), specifically surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and pneumonias. Mean length of stay was significantly shorter after LAC vs. OC (6.2 vs. 8.7 days, P < 0.0001). There were no differences between LAC and OC in the reoperation rate (5.5% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.79) or 30-day mortality (1.4% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.53).
Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy was associated with lower morbidity compared to OC in select patients, specifically for infectious complications.
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66. CrossRef
- Prystowsky JB, Bordage G, Feinglass JM. Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery. 2002;132(4):663–670. Discussion 670–672. doi:10.1067/msy.2002.127550. CrossRef
- Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284(23):3028–3035. doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3028. CrossRef
- Cooperman AM, Katz V, Zimmon D, Botero G. Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1(4):221–224.
- Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(3):144–150.
- Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ et al. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;216(6):703–707. doi:10.1097/00000658-199212000-00015. CrossRef
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(7):477–484. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221–7. CrossRef
- Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–1726. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2. CrossRef
- Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–2229. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5. CrossRef
- Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187(1):46–54. Discussion 54–55. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X. CrossRef
- Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(4):636–640. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8516-4. CrossRef
- Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(5):375–388. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00974.x. CrossRef
- Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(7):508–516. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04141.x. CrossRef
- Curet MJ, Putrakul K, Pitcher DE et al. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(11):1062–1066. doi:10.1007/s004640000092. CrossRef
- ACS-NSQIP Program Specfics. ACS NSQIP Data; Participant Use Data File. Available at http://acsnsqip.org/puf/PufRequestHomepage.aspx. Last accessed January 7, 2008.
- ACS-NSQIP Participant Use File User’s Guide. Available at https://acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS_NSQIP_Participant_User_Data_File_User_Guide.pdf. Last accessed January 7, 2008.
- Khuri SF. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery. 2005;138(5):837–843. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.016. CrossRef
- Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J et al. The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(6):1089–1102. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.028. CrossRef
- ACS-NSQIP Program Specfics. Surgical Case Inclusion/Exclusion Overview. Available at http://acsnsqip.org/main/program_case_inclusion_exclusion.asp. Last accessed January 7, 2008.
- ACS-NSQIP Program Specfics. Surgical Clinical Nurse Reviewer Training. Available at http://acsnsqip.org/main/program_nurse_training.asp. Last accessed January 7, 2008.
- CPT 2006. Current Procedural Terminology. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2005.
- Luellen JK, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Eval Rev. 2005;29(6):530–558. doi:10.1177/0193841X05275596. CrossRef
- Hosmer J, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 1999.
- Department of Health and Human Services. The International Classification of Diseases. 9th revised. clinical modification: ICD-9-CM. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1998.
- Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, Martin MJ. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;12:583–591. CrossRef
- Vittimberga FJ Jr, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg. 1998;227(3):326–334. doi:10.1097/00000658-199803000-00003. CrossRef
- Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, Trias M. Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg. 2000;87(5):536–544. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01429.x. CrossRef
- Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298. CrossRef
- Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(4):577–581. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-8148-3. CrossRef
- Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9416):1187–1192. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3. CrossRef
- Bilimoria K, Bentrem D, Nelson H, et al. Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Cancer: Utilization and Outcomes in the United States. Arch Surg. 2008; In press.
- Laparoscopic-assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Outcomes from 121 Hospitals
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume 12, Issue 11 , pp 2001-2009
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Colon cancer
- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 251 E. Huron Street, Galter 3-150, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- 2. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
- 3. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- 4. Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA