Volume and Outcome for Major Upper GI Surgery in England
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The correlation between hospital or surgeon volume and outcome for complex surgical procedures has been the subject of several studies in recent years. In the UK, such studies have been used to strengthen the case for centralization of such procedures. The recent availability of easily accessible and fully independent data on hospital outcomes for surgical services in the UK has provided the opportunity to review any potential associations between volume and outcome in the UK.
Hospital Episode Statistic (HES) data were collected through Dr Foster® for four different upper GI procedures (gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and liver resection) for a 6-year period from 1999 to 2005. Data for each procedure were divided into volume-dependant quartiles to assess any differences in mortality outcome.
Generally, mortality rates for all four procedures are lower than previously studies have suggested. A significant trend favoring high volume providers was noted for esophagectomy, with mortality rates varying from 7.8% to 4.0% for lowest to highest volume providers (p < 0.001). A similar but less clear-cut trend was noted for pancreaticoduodenectomy. There was no significant difference for gastric and liver resection between low- and high-volume providers. There was a 20% decrease in centers performing esophagectomy and 28% for centers performing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
There is a volume outcome association for esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. There is no association for gastrectomy or hepatectomy.
- Begg, CB, Cramer, LD, Hoskins, WJ, Brennan, MF (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality of major cancer surgery. JAMA 280: pp. 1747-1751 CrossRef
- Birkmeyer, JD, Siewers, AE, Finlayson, EV, Stukel, TA, Lucas, FL, Batista, I, Welch, HG, DE, DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. New England J Med 346: pp. 1128-1137 CrossRef
- Halm, EA, Lee, C, Chassin, MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137: pp. 511-520
- Hannan, EL, Radzyner, M, Rubin, D, Dougherty, J, Brennan, MF (2002) The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 131: pp. 6-15 CrossRef
- Killeen, SD, O’Sullivan, MJ, Coffey, JC, Kirwan, WO, Redmond, HP (2005) Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 92: pp. 389-402 CrossRef
- Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical officers of England and Wales. A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. (The Calman-Hine Report). London: Department of Health, 1995.
- National Cancer Guidance Steering Group. Improving Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers. The Manual 2001.
- Gillison, EW, Powell, J, McConkey, CC, Spychal, RT (2002) Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg 89: pp. 344-348 CrossRef
- Finlayson, EV, Godney, PP, Birkmeyer, JD (2003) Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: A national study. Arch Surgery 138: pp. 721-725 CrossRef
- Gordon, TA, Bowman, HM, Bass, EB, Lillemoe, KD, Yeo, CJ, Heitmiller, RF, Choti, MA, Burleyson, GP, Hsieh, G, Cameron, JL (1999) Complex gastrointestinal surgery: Impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 189: pp. 46-56 CrossRef
- Birkmeyer, JD, Sun, Y, Goldfaden, A, Birkmeyer, NJ, Stukel, TA (2006) Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 106: pp. 2476-2481 CrossRef
- Dimick, JB, Cattaneo, SM, Lipsett, PA, Pronovost, PJ, Heitmiller, RF (2001) Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland. Ann Thorac Surg 72: pp. 334-341 CrossRef
- Dimick, JB, Cowan, JA, Ailawadi, G, Wainess, RM, Upchurch, GR (2003) National variation in operative mortality rates for esophageal resection and the need for quality improvement. Arch Surg 138: pp. 1305-1309 CrossRef
- Lin, H-C, Xirasagar, S, Lee, H-C, Chiah, C-Y (2006) Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer related gastrointestinal resections: The experience of an Asian country. Ann Surg Oncol 13: pp. 1182-1188 CrossRef
- Urbach, DR, Bell, CM, Austin, PC (2003) Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: Estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ, Can Med Assoc J 168: pp. 1409-1414
- Patti, MG, Corvera, CU, Glasgow, RE, Way, LW (1998) A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg 2: pp. 186-192 CrossRef
- Glasgow, RE, Mulvihill, SJ (1996) Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med 165: pp. 294-300
- Sosa, JA, Bowman, HM, Gordon, TA, Bass, EB, Yeo, CJ, Lillemoe, KD, Pitt, HA, Tielsch, JM, Cameron, JL (1998) Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 228: pp. 429-438 CrossRef
- Gouma, DJ, Van Geenen, RC, Van Gulik, TM, De Haan, RJ, De Wit, LT, Busch, OR, Obertop, H (2000) Rates of complication and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232: pp. 786-795 CrossRef
- Lieberman, MD, Kilburn, H, Lindsey, M, Brennan, MF (1995) Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 222: pp. 638-645 CrossRef
- Kotwall, CA, Maxwell, G, Brinker, CC, Koch, GG, Covington, DL (2002) National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 9: pp. 847-854 CrossRef
- Simunovic, M, To, T, Theriault, M, Langer, B (1999) Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funde health care system. CMAJ 160: pp. 643-648
- Damhuis, RA, Meurs, CJ, Dijkhuis, CM, Stassen, LP, Wiggers, T (2002) Hospital volume and post-operative mortality after resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 28: pp. 401-405 CrossRef
- Bachmann, MO, Alderson, D, Edwards, D, Wotton, S, Bedford, C, Peter, TJ, Harvey, IM (2002) Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancers. Br J Surg 89: pp. 914-922 CrossRef
- Choti, MA, Bowman, HM, Pitt, HA, Sosa, JA, Sitzmann, JV, Cameron, JL, Gordon, TA (1998) Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers?. J Gastrointest Surg 2: pp. 11-20 CrossRef
- Glasgow, RE, Showstack, JA, Katz, PP, Corvera, CU, Warren, RS, Mulvihill, SJ (1999) The relationship be tween hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 134: pp. 30-35 CrossRef
- Liu, JH, Zingmond, DS, McGory, ML, SooHoo, NF, Ettner, SL, Brook, RH, Ko, CY (2006) Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA 296: pp. 1973-1980 CrossRef
- Campbell, SE, Campbell, MK, Grimshaw, JM, Walker, AE (2001) A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health Med 23: pp. 205-211 CrossRef
- Birkmeyer, JD, Stukel, TA, Siewers, AE, Goodney, PP, Wennberg, DE, Lucas, FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349: pp. 2117-2127 CrossRef
- Volume and Outcome for Major Upper GI Surgery in England
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 353-357
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich, UK
- 2. Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK