Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Confluent hepatic fibrosis in liver cirrhosis: possible relation with middle hepatic venous drainage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the location of confluent hepatic fibrosis in relation to the portal and hepatic venous anatomy using multidetector computed tomography (CT) and to clarify the influence of the hepatic venous drainage on confluent fibrosis.

Materials and methods

The study population consisted of 879 patients diagnosed with cirrhosis: 539 men and 340 women (65.9 ± 10.6 years) and 633 with Child-Pugh class A, 161 with class B, and 85 with class C. The cause of cirrhosis was hepatitis C (n = 528) and hepatitis B (n = 122) virus infection, alcoholism (n = 114), and others (n = 115). The confluent fibrosis was diagnosed using CT images according to previous reports and statistically analyzed (p < 0.05).

Results

Thirty-five confluent fibrosis lesions in 30 patients (3.4 %) were identified. The predictive factors were alcoholic cirrhosis [odds ratio (OR), 7.25; p < 0.0001], Child-Pugh class C (OR, 6.95; p < 0.0001), and Child-Pugh class B (OR, 2.91; p < 0.0023). Confluent fibrosis was most frequently seen in the middle hepatic venous drainage area (n = 21) or at the boundary between the medial and anterior segments (n = 17), and each distribution of the location of confluent fibrosis was significantly unequal (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Confluent fibrosis was most commonly located in the middle hepatic venous drainage area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman SL. Hepatic fibrosis: overview. Toxicology. 2008;254:120–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace K, Burt AD, Wright MC. Liver fibrosis. Biochem Genet. 2008;411:1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Faria SC, Ganesan K, Mwangi I, Shiehmorteza M, Viamonte B, Mazhar S, et al. MR imaging of liver fibrosis: current state of the art. Radiographics. 2009;29:1615–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohtomo K, Baron RL, Dodd GD 3rd, Federle MP, Miller WJ, Campbell WL, et al. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in advanced cirrhosis: appearance at CT. Radiology. 1993;188:31–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohtomo K, Baron RL, Dodd GD 3rd, Federle MP, Ohtomo Y, Confer SR. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in advanced cirrhosis: evaluation with MR Imaging. Radiology. 1993;189:871–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brancatelli G, Baron RL, Federle MP, Sparacia G, Pealer K. Focal confluent fibrosis in cirrhotic liver: natural history studied with serial CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1341–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Ambrosini R, Lagalla R, Carriero A, Midiri M, et al. Cirrhosis: CT and MR imaging evaluation. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:57–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Nishie A, Asayama Y, et al. Pitfalls in the imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular nodules in the cirrhotic and noncirrhotic liver. Intervirology. 2004;47:238–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelekis NL, Makri E, Vassiou A, Patsiaoura K, Spiridakis M, Dalekos GN. Confluent hepatic fibrosis as the presenting imaging sign in nonadvanced alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuo M, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Asano T, Tomimatsu H, Manabe T, et al. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in cirrhosis: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging findings. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:146–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murata S, Itai Y, Asato M, Kobayashi H, Nakajima K, Eguchi N, et al. Effect of temporary occlusion of the hepatic vein on dual blood in the liver: evaluation with spiral CT. Radiology. 1995;197:351–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hiraki T, Kanazawa S, Mimura H, Yasui K, Tanaka A, Dendo S, et al. Altered hepatic hemodynamics caused by temporary occlusion of the right hepatic vein: evaluation with Doppler US in 14 patients. Radiology. 2001;220:357–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okuda K, Itai Y. Cirrhosis. In: Okuda K, editor. Hepatobiliary disease: pathophysiology and imaging. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2001. p. 119–51.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, Koda W, Minami T, et al. Selective atrophy of the middle hepatic venous drainage area in hepatitis C-related cirrhotic liver: morphometric study by using multidetector CT. Radiology. 2010;257:705–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Gabata T. Enlargement of hilar periportal space: a sign of early cirrhosis at MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:136–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Awaya H, Mitchell DG, Kamishima T, Holland G, Ito K, Matsumoto T. Cirrhosis: modified caudate-right lobe ratio. Radiology. 2002;224:769–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn IO, de Lange EE. Early hyperenhancement of confluent hepatic fibrosis on dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:901–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Kadoya M, Gabata T, Arai K, Takashima T. Delayed enhancement of fibrotic areas in hepatic masses: CT-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16:206–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Couinaud C, editor. Surgical anatomy of the liver revisited. Paris: Couinaud; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cho A, Okazumi S, Makino H, Miura F, Ohira G, Yoshinaga Y, et al. Relation between hepatic and portal veins in the right paramedian sector: proposal for anatomical reclassification of the liver. World J Surg. 2004;28:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanemura E, Togo S, Shizawa R, Tanaka K, Shimada H. Subdivision of liver anterior segment into two units according to hepatic venous drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1056–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harbin WP, Robert NJ, Ferrucci JT. Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in intrahepatic morphology: a radiological and pathological analysis. Radiology. 1980;135:273–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Itai Y, Murata S, Kurosaki Y. Straight border sign of the liver: spectrum of CT appearances and causes. Radiographics. 1995;15:1089–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Starzl TE, Francavilla A, Halgrimson CG, Francavilla FR, Porter KA, Brown TH, et al. The origin, hormonal nature, and action of hepatotrophic substances in portal venous blood. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;137:179–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrance JA, McDermott VG, Paulson EK, Keogan MT, Delong DM, Meyers WC, et al. Zebra pattern: a diagnostically challenging hepatic parenchymal enhancement pattern at CT arterial portography. Radiology. 1997;203:115–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenthal SJ, Harrison LA, Baxter KG, Wetzel LH, Cox GG, Batnitzky S. Doppler US of helical flow in the portal vein. RadioGraphics. 1995;15:1103–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathieu D, Vasile N, Menu Y, Van Beers B, Lorphelin JM, Pringot J. Budd-Chiari syndrome: dynamic CT. Radiology. 1987;165:409–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wanless IR, Wong F, Blendis LM, Greig P, Heathcote EJ, Levy G. Hepatic and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: possible role in development of parenchymal extinction and portal hypertension. Hepatology. 1995;21:1238–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Portmann B, Nakanuma Y. Diseases of the bile ducts. In: MacSween RNM, Burt AD, Portmann BC, Ishak KG, Scheuer PJ, Anthony PP, editors. Pathology of the liver. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 435–506.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brown JJ, Naylor MJ, Yagan N. Imaging of hepatic cirrhosis. Radiology. 1997;202:1–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Singhi AD, Maklouf HR, Mehrotra AK, Goodman ZD, Drebber U, Dienes HP, et al. Segmental atrophy of the liver: a distinctive pseudotumor of the liver with variable histologic appearances. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:364–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bilaj F, Hyslop WB, Rivero H, Firat Z, Vaidean G, Shrestha R, et al. MR imaging findings in autoimmune hepatitis: correlation with clinical staging. Radiology. 2005;236:896–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blachar A, Federle MP, Brancatelli G. Primary biliary cirrhosis: clinical, pathologic, and helical CT findings in 53 patients. Radiology. 2001;220:329–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maher JJ. Hepatic fibrosis caused by alcohol. Semin Liver Dis. 1990;10:66–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Japan Radiological Society for Confluent hepatic fibrosis in liver cirrhosis: possible relation with middle hepatic venous drainage (KJ-23-10). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumi Ozaki.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by Japan Radiological Society for Confluent hepatic fibrosis in liver cirrhosis: possible relation with middle hepatic venous drainage (KJ-23-10).

About this article

Cite this article

Ozaki, K., Matsui, O., Gabata, T. et al. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in liver cirrhosis: possible relation with middle hepatic venous drainage. Jpn J Radiol 31, 530–537 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0222-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0222-8

Keywords

Navigation