Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-criteria logistics modeling for military humanitarian assistance and disaster relief aerial delivery operations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given that it is not always feasible to reach an affected area via land or sea within the first week following a natural disaster, aerial delivery provides the primary means to rapidly supply the affected population. Further, it is often the case that high density delivery of humanitarian aid supplies are taken over by non-friendly groups within the affected population. By using direct airdrop systems to deliver large quantities of individually wrapped food and water items, dispersion among the affected disaster relief population will occur more quickly. In this paper, we proffer a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to optimize the military humanitarian assistance/disaster relief (HA/DR) aerial delivery supply chain network. The model uses stochastic, mixed-integer, weighted goal programming to optimize network design, logistics costs, staging locations, procurement amounts, and inventory levels. The MCDA framework enables decision-makers to explore the trade-offs between military HA/DR aerial delivery supply chain efficiency and responsiveness, while optimizing across a wide range of real-world, probabilistic scenarios to account for the inherent uncertainty in the location of global humanitarian disasters as well as the amount of demand to be met.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Defense: Joint Publication 3–29: Foreign Humanitarian Assistance, 03 January 2014 (2014)

  2. Department of Defense: Government Training Aid 90-01-030 Department of Defense Support to Foreign Disaster Relief, 13 July 2011 (2011)

  3. Meloni, A., Riley, J., Benney, R., Patel, S., Groller, S.: Humanitarian Airdrop Over Populated Areas. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2011-2507 (2014)

  4. Thomas, A., Kopczak, L.: From Logistics to Supply Chain Management: The Path Forward in the Humanitarian Sector. Fritz Institute, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Wassenhove, L.: Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57(5), 475–489 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. De la Torre, L.E., Dolinskaya, I.S., Smilowitz, K.: Disaster relief routing: integrating research and practice. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 46(1), 88–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ravindran, A.R., Warsing, D.P.: Supply Chain Engineering: Models and Applications. Taylor and Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balcik, B., Beamon, B.: Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 11(2), 101–121 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratliff, D.: The challenge of humanitarian relief logistics. OR-MS Today 34(6), 31 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beamon, B.M.: Humanitarian relief chains: issues and challenges. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (2004)

  11. Beamon, B., Balcik, B.: Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. Int. J. Public Sector Manag. 21(1), 4–25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balcik, B., Beamon, B.M., Krejci, C.C., Muramatsu, K.M., Ramirez, M.: Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges, and opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 126, 22–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duran, S., Ergun, O, Keskinocak, P., Swann, J.: Humanitarian logistics: advanced purchasing and pre-positioning of relief items. In: Bookbinder, J.H. (Ed.) Handbook of Global Logistics: Transportation in International Supply Chains, vol 181, pp. 447–462. Springer, New York (2012)

  14. Ergun, O., Guyi, L., Heier-Stamm, J., Keskinocak, P., Swann, J.: Improving humanitarian operations through collaboration. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23(6), 1002–1014 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortuño, M.T., Crist’obal, P., Ferrer, J.M., Martín-Campo, F.J., Muñoz, S., Tirado, G., Vitoriano, B.: Decision aid models and systems for humanitarian logistics. A survey. In: Decision Aid Models for Disaster Management and Emergencies, pp. 17–44. Atlantis Press, New York (2013)

  16. Akkihal, A.: Inventory Pre-Positioning for Humanitarian Operations. Unpublished masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2006)

  17. Duran, S., Gutierrez, M., Keskinocak, P.: Pre-positioning of emergency items for CARE international. Interfaces 41(3), 223–237 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salmeron, J., Apte, A.: Stochastic optimization for natural disaster asset prepositioning. Prod. Oper. Manag. 19(5), 561–574 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mogilevsky, P.: Optimizing Transportation of Disaster Relief Material to Support U.S. Pacific Command Foreign Humanitarian Assistance Operations. Unpublished masters thesis, Naval Postgraduate School (2013)

  20. Schnebele, E., Cervone, G., Waters, N.: Road assessment after flood events using non-authoritative data. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Discuss. 1(4), 4155–4179 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park, S.: A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model for Resource Allocation in Humanitarian Relief. Unpublished masters thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology (2007)

  22. Vitoriano, B., Ortuno, M., Tirado, G., Montero, J.: A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. J. Global Optim. 51, 189–208 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Jabalameli, M., Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, S.: A multi-objective robust stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics under uncertainty. OR Spectr. 35(4), 905–933 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tapia, A., Moore, K., Johnson, N.: Beyond the trustworthy tweet: a deeper understanding of microblogged data use by disaster response and humanitarian relief organizations. In: Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference, pp. 770–778 (2013)

  25. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., Gorman, S.: Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Med. Health Policy 2(2), 7–33 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sokat, K.Y., Zhou, R., Dolinskaya, I.S., Smilowitz, K., Chan, J.: Capturing real-time data in disaster response logistics. In: Working Paper No. 14-05, Northwestern University. http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/dolira/CapturingRealTimeData_WP. Accessed 29 January 2015 (2014)

  27. Ozdamar, L., Ertem, A.M.: Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (in press) (2014)

  28. Jahre, M., Jensen, L.M.: Coordination in humanitarian logistics through clusters. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 40(8/9), 657–674 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobler, W.: Global spatial analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 26(6), 493–500 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bastian, N.: A robust, multi-criteria modeling approach for optimizing aeromedical evacuation asset emplacement. J. Defense Model. Simul. 7(1), 5–23 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Robusto, C.C.: The cosine-haversine formula. Am. Math. Mon. 38–40 (1957)

  32. Emergency Events Disaster Database: Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters. http://www.emdat.be/. Accessed 22 July 2014 (2014)

  33. The World Factbook 2013–14: Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html (2013)

  34. GAMS Development Corporation: The General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). http://www.gams.com (2014)

  35. Hendricks, H., Singhal, V.: The effect of supply chain disruptions on long-term shareholder value, profitability, and share price volatility. Rep. ChainLink Res. (2010)

  36. Rubinstein, R., Shapiro, A.: Optimization of static simulation models by the score function method. Math. Comput. Simul. 32(4), 373–392 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Mak, W., Morton, P., Wood, R.: Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 24(1–2), 47–56 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, F., Wang, L., Shi, Y.: Generalized expected value model based on compound quantification and its application in transportation problems. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 7(6), 3303–3315 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center. The first author was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DGE1255832. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Army, National Science Foundation, Pennsylvania State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, or Texas Tech University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 355 Leonhard Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Nathaniel D. Bastian

  2. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 755 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Paul M. Griffin

  3. Vehicle Applied Research Division, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, 4603 Flare Loop, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA

    Eric Spero

  4. Rawls College of Business Administration, Texas Tech University, 703 Flint Ave, Lubbock, TX, 79410, USA

    Lawrence V. Fulton

Authors
  1. Nathaniel D. Bastian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul M. Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Spero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lawrence V. Fulton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel D. Bastian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastian, N.D., Griffin, P.M., Spero, E. et al. Multi-criteria logistics modeling for military humanitarian assistance and disaster relief aerial delivery operations. Optim Lett 10, 921–953 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0888-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0888-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation