Coming Clean About the Criminal Law
- James Edwards
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper addresses three doctrinal phenomena of which it finds evidence in English law: the quiet extension of the criminal law so as to criminalise that which is by no means an obvious offence; the creation of offences the goal of which is not to guide potential offenders away from crime; and the existence of offending behaviour which is not itself thought to justify arrest or prosecution. While such phenomena have already been criticised by other criminal law theorists, this paper offers a critique to which little attention has yet been paid. It argues that the existence of these phenomena has been concealed from public view: that the organs of state have encouraged the belief that they are no part of English law. The paper then argues that it is high time the state came clean. The state owes its people answers for the imposition of the criminal law: it must account for the creation and enforcement of any given criminal offence. When the state misleads its people about the criminal law’s scope, goals and enforcement, it refuses to provide those people with the answers they are owed.
- Ashworth, A. (2008). Conceptions of overcriminalisation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 5, 407–425.
- Bentham, J. (1823). Truth versus Ashhurst. London: T Moses.
- Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid-row: A study of peace-keeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699. CrossRef
- Blair, T. (2003). Speech to the US Congress. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3076253.stm. Last accessed 4 May 2010.
- Crown Prosecution Service (2010). Legal guidance: Sexual offences Act 2003. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sexual_offences_act. Last accessed 10 May 2010.
- Duff, A. (2007). Answering for crime. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V. (2007). The trial on trial (Vol. 3). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Edwards, J. (2010). Justice denied: The criminal law and the ouster of the courts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30, 725–748. CrossRef
- Gardner, J. (2007a). Some types of law. In D. Edlin (Ed.), Common law theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Gardner, J. (2007b). Offences and defences. Oxford: OUP. CrossRef
- Gardner, J. (2008). Introduction. In H. L. A. Hart (Ed.), Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: OUP.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.
- Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Punishment and responsibility (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP. CrossRef
- Husak, D. (2008a). Overcriminalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Husak, D. (2008b). Why criminal law: A question of content? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2, 99. CrossRef
- Lacey, N. (2009). Historicising criminalisation. Modern Law Review, 72, 936–960. CrossRef
- Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: CUP.
- Secretary of State for the Home Department (2002). Protecting the public: Strengthening protection against sex offenders and reforming the law on sexual offences. Cm 5668.
- Spencer, J. R. (2004). The sexual offences Act 2003: (2) child and family offences. Criminal Law Review, 50, 347.
- Spencer, J. R. (2008). The drafting of criminal legislation: Need it be so impenetrable? Cambridge Law Review, 67, 585–605. CrossRef
- Tadros, V. (2008). Crimes and security. Modern Law Review, 71, 940–970. CrossRef
- Tadros, V., & Tierney, S. (2004). The presumption of innocence and the human rights act. Modern Law Review, 67, 402–434. CrossRef
- Coming Clean About the Criminal Law
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 5, Issue 3 , pp 315-332
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Criminal process
- Antony Duff
- Industry Sectors
- James Edwards (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University College, University of Oxford, 17 Hernes Road, Oxford, OX2 7PX, UK