Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment
- Zachary Hoskins
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper attempts to establish that, and explain why, the practice of punishing offenders is in principle morally permissible. My account is a nonstandard version of the fair play view, according to which punishment’s permissibility derives from reciprocal obligations shared by members of a political community, understood as a mutually beneficial, cooperative venture. Most fair play views portray punishment as an appropriate means of removing the unfair advantage an offender gains relative to law-abiding members of the community. Such views struggle, however, to provide a plausible account of this unfairly gained benefit. By contrast, on my account punishment’s permissibility follows more straightforwardly from the fair play view of political obligation: specifically, the rule instituting punishment is itself among those rules with which members of the political community are obliged to comply. For criminal offenders, compliance requires submitting to the prospect of punishment.
- Armstrong, K. G. (1969). The retributivist hits back. In H. B. Acton (Ed.), The philosophy of punishment. London: Macmillan.
- Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
- Boonin, D. (2008). The problem of punishment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Dagger, R. (1993). Playing fair with punishment. Ethics, 103, 473–488. CrossRef
- Dagger, R. (2008). Punishment as fair play. Res Publica, 14, 259–275. CrossRef
- Dolinko, D. (1991). Some thoughts about retributivism. Ethics, 101(3), 537–559. CrossRef
- Duff, R. A. (1986). Trials and punishments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Falls, M. M. (1987). Retribution, reciprocity, and respect for persons. Law and Philosophy, 6(1), 25–51. CrossRef
- Feinberg, J. (1970). The expressive function of punishment. In Doing and deserving: essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Hampton, Jean. (1991). A new theory of retribution. In C. Morris & R. Frey (Eds.), Liability and responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hampton, J. (2007). The intrinsic worth of persons. In D. Farnham (Ed.), Contractarianism in moral and political philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are there any natural rights? The Philosophical Review, 64(4), 175–191. CrossRef
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Hospers, J. (1977). Punishment, protection, and retaliation. In J. B. Cederblom & W. L. Blizek (Eds.), Justice and punishment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
- Kant, I. (1996). The doctrine of right. In The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant, practical philosophy, trans. and Ed.: M. J. Gregor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Kelsen, H. (1946). General theory of law and state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Klosko, G. (1992). The principle of fairness and political obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Klosko, George. (2005). Political obligations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Lacey, N. (1988). State punishment: Political principles and community values. London: Routledge.
- Locke, J. (1996). Second treatise of civil government. In R. M. Stewart (Ed.), Readings in social, political philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Matravers, M. (2000). Justice and punishment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism (2nd ed.). In G. Sher (Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
- Morris, H. (1968). Persons and punishment. Monist, 52, 475–501.
- Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 23, 1–42. CrossRef
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
- Perkins, L. H. (1970). Suggestion for a justification of punishment. Ethics, 81(1), 55–61. CrossRef
- Pettit, P. (2003). Consequentialism. In S. Darwall (Ed.), Consequentialism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Rawls, J. (1964). Legal obligation and the duty of fair play. In S. Hook (Ed.) Law and philosophy: A symposium. New York City: New York University Press.
- Sher, G. (1989). Desert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Simmons, A. J. (1996). The principle of fair play. In M. S. Robert (Ed.), Readings in social, political philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Varden, H. (2008). Kant’s non-voluntarist conception of political obligations: Why justice is impossible in the state of nature. Kantian Review, 13(2), 1–45.
- Von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
- Von Hirsch, A. (1999). Punishment, penance and the state: A reply to Duff. In M. Matravers (Ed.), Punishment and political theory. Oxford, UK: Hart.
- Zaibert, L. (2006). Punishment and retribution. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
- Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 5, Issue 1 , pp 53-71
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Fair play
- Political obligation
- Industry Sectors
- Zachary Hoskins (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA