Excusing Necessity and Terror: What Criminal Law Can Teach Constitutional Law
- Alan Brudner
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This essay proposes a theory of excuse that, without blending it into exculpation, avoids the condonation of crime. The question it takes up is: given that neither compulsion by circumstances nor by human threats removes the legal reason for punishing, how can its exonerating force be rendered compatible with the state’s general duty to punish the guilty? The chapter criticizes various proposals for reconciling excuse with the duty to punish the guilty, including the moral involuntariness theory, the concession to frailty theory, and the conformity to moral expectation theory. It then proposes a solution: moral blamelessness exonerates because it simulates the conditions for legal exculpation. Just as the exculpated actor acknowledges the legal norm of mutual respect for agents, so does the excused actor acknowledge the public reason of the self-sufficient political community of which the legal norm is a part. The author argues that this theory would excuse the altruistic no less than the self-preferring murderer.
- Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger.
- Aristotle, (1941). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.
- Brudner, A. (2008). Subjective fault for crime: A reinterpretation. Legal Theory, 14, 1–38. CrossRef
- Brudner, A. (1987). A theory of necessity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 339–368. CrossRef
- Dressler, J. (1989). Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the excuse and searching for its proper limits. Southern California Law Review, 62, 1331–1386.
- Duff, A. (2007). Answering for crime. Oxford: Hart.
- Foot, P. (2002). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fletcher, G. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Fletcher, G. (2007). The grammar of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fuller, L. (1949). The case of the Speluncean explorers. Harvard Law Review, 62, 616–645. CrossRef
- Gardner, J. (2007). Offences and defences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Horder, (2004). Excusing crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hörnle, T. (2007). Hijacked airplanes: May they be shot down? New Criminal Law Review, 10, 582–612. CrossRef
- Kadish, S. (1987). Excusing crime. California Law Review, 75, 257–289. CrossRef
- Klimchuk, D. (2002). Necessity, deterrence, and standing. Legal Theory, 8, 339–358. CrossRef
- Shaffer, M. (1998). Scrutinizing Duress: The constitutional validity of section 17 of the criminal code. Criminal Law Quarterly, 40, 444–475.
- Stephen, J. F. (1883). A history of the criminal law of England. New York: Franklin.
- Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415. CrossRef
- Luftsicherheitsgesetz Case, BverfG, 1 BvR 357/05 vom 15.2.2006.
- R. v. Dudley and Stephens, (1884), 14 Q.B.D. 273.
- R. v. Howe,  A.C. 417.
- Perka v. The Queen,  2 S.C.R. 232.
- R. v. Ruzic,  1 S.C.R. 687.
- R. v. Baker and Wilkins,  Crim. L. R. 497.
- Excusing Necessity and Terror: What Criminal Law Can Teach Constitutional Law
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 3, Issue 2 , pp 147-166
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Excusing necessity
- Criminal law
- Industry Sectors
- Alan Brudner (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada