On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse
- Ian Howard Dennis
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The article reviews recent developments in England in the law of necessity as a defence to crime and calls for its further extension. It argues that the defence of necessity presents the criminal law with difficult questions of competing values and the ordering of harms. English law has taken a nuanced position on the respective roles of the courts and the legislature in the ordering of harms, although the development of the law has been pragmatic rather than coherently theorised. The law has granted necessity some scope as an exculpatory principle in the law of general defences, but it has also respected the primacy of the legislature as the legitimate arbiter of many of the competitions of value that necessity throws up. The recognition of necessity has not been in the form of a single unified defence of that name. Rather it has taken the form of a number of defences, based on a principle of necessity, but with different nomenclature and different rationales. This approach to necessity is defended as right in terms of principle and policy. Any further development of necessity as a general defence should be restricted to two contexts, namely those of emergencies, and of conflicts of duty, where a danger of death or serious injury is present.
- Ashworth, A. (2006). Principles of criminal law (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sir Blackstone, W. (1765). Commentaries on the Laws of England (4 Vols). Chicago: University of Chicago.
- Bohlander, M. (2006). In Extremis – Hijacked Airplanes, ‘Collateral Damage’ and the limits of the criminal law. Criminal Law Review, 579–592.
- Brudner, A. (1987). A Theory of Necessity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(3), 338–368.
- Clarkson, C. M. V. (2004). Necessary action: A new defence. Criminal Law Review, 81–95.
- Dressler, J. (1989). Exegesis of the law of Duress: Justifying the excuse and searching for its proper limits. Southern California Law Review, 62, 1331–1386.
- Duff, A. (1993). Choice, character and criminal liability. Law and Philosophy, 12, 345–383.
- Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
- Fletcher, G. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
- Gardner, S. (1991). Necessity’s newest inventions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 125–135.
- Gardner, J. (1996). Justifications and reasons. In A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (Eds.), Harm and culpability (Chap. 5). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Gardner, J. (1998). The gist of excuses. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 1, 575–598.
- Gardner, S. (2005). Direct action and the defence of necessity. Criminal Law Review, 371–380.
- Glazebrook, P. R. (1972a). The necessity plea in English criminal law. Cambridge Law Journal, 31, 87–119.
- Greenawalt, K. (1984). The perplexing borders of justification and excuse. 84 Columbia Law Review, 84, 1897–1927.
- Gur-Arye, M. (1986). Should the criminal law distinguish between necessity as a justification and necessity as an excuse? Law Quarterly Review, 102, 71–89.
- Sir Hale, M. (1736). History of the pleas of the crown (2 Vols). London: London Professional Books.
- Horder, J. (1998). Self-defence, necessity and duress: understanding the relationship. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 11, 143–165.
- Horder, J. (2000). On the irrelevance of motive in criminal law. In J. Horder (Ed.), Oxford essays in jurisprudence (4th Series, p. 173). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Horder, J. (2004). Excusing crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Leverick, F. (2007). Defending self-defence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17, 563–579.
- Moller, K. (2006). On treating persons as ends: The German Aviation Security Act, human dignity, and the German Federal Constitutional Court. Public Law, 457–466.
- Norrie, A. W. (2001). Crime reason and history (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ost, S. (2005). Euthanasia and the defence of necessity: Advocating a more appropriate legal response. Criminal Law Review, 355–370.
- Robinson, P. (1982). Criminal law defenses: A systematic analysis. Columbia Law Review, 82, 199–291.
- Rogers, J. (2001). Necessity, private defence and the killing of Mary. Criminal Law Review, 515–526.
- Simester, A. P., & Sullivan, G. R. (2007). Criminal law theory and doctrine (3rd ed.). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Simpson, A. W. B. (1984). Cannibalism and the common law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Smith, J. C. (1989). Justification and excuse in the criminal law. London: Stevens and Sons, Ltd.
- Smith, J. C. (1994). The right to life and the right to kill in law enforcement. New Law Journal, 144, 354–356.
- Smith, J. C., & Hogan, B. (2005). Criminal law (11th ed.) prepared by D. Ormerod. USA: Oxford University Press.
- Stephen, J. F. (1883). History of the criminal law of England. London: Macmillan.
- Stephen, J. F. (1887). Digest of the criminal law (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
- Uniacke, S. (1994). Permissible killing: The self-defence justification of homicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Uniacke, S. (2001). Was Mary’s death murder? Medical Law Review, 9, 208–220.
- von Hirsch, A., & Jareborg, N. (1991). Gauging criminal harms: A living standard analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 1–38.
- Westen, P. (2006). An attitudinal theory of excuse. Law and Philosophy, 25, 289–375.
- Westen, P., & Mangiafico, J. (2003). The criminal defense of duress: A justification, not an excuse—and why it matters. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 6, 833–950.
- Williams, G. (1961). Criminal law the general part (2nd ed.). London: Stevens & Sons.
- Williams, G. (1982). The theory of excuses. Criminal Law Review, 732–742.
- Wilson, W. (2002). Central issues in criminal theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 3, Issue 1 , pp 29-49
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Justification and excuse
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University College London, London, UK