Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak
- C. M. V. Clarkson
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the UK the criminal law is increasingly seen as the instant panacea to any social problem. Since the present Labour Government came into power it has created well over 3,000 new criminal offences.
The Independent, August 16, 2006.The debate in the 1960s was about the appropriate criteria for criminalisation with the aim of answering the question: what offences could be decriminalised? Now, the criminal law is seen more in terms of a first resort solution to any problem. Husak rightly argues that the criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment which involves the deliberate infliction of hard treatment and censure. It involves moral condemnation and liability to stigmatic punishment. As Bentham put it, it involves an evil.
See Bentham (1789).Accordingly, as Husak makes clear, it needs justification.
Husak argues that the punishment of offenders infringes what he terms “the right not to be punished”. For society it involves immense drawbacks: vast expense, the susceptibility to
- Amirthalingam, K. (2006). Culture, crime and culpability in perspectives on the defence of provocation. In A. Renteln & M. Foblets (Eds.), Multicultural jurisprudence: Comparative perspectives on the cultural defence. Hart Publications.
- Ashworth, A. (2006). Principles of criminal law (5th ed., pp. 30–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. London: T. Payne and Son.
- Finnis, J. (1971). The restoration of retribution. Analysis, 32, 131. CrossRef
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Prolegomenon to the principles of punishment. In Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Husak, D. (2004). The criminal law as last resort. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 207, 223.
- Minkkinen, P. (2006). ‘If Taken in Earnest’: Criminal law doctrine and the last resort. Howard Journal, 45, 521. CrossRef
- Morgan, R., & Clarkson, C. (1995). The politics of sentencing reform: introduction. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform. Oxford: Clarendon University Press.
- Tonry, M. (1987). Sentencing guidelines and sentencing commissions—The second generation. In K. Pease & M. Wasik (Eds.), Sentencing reform: Guidance or guidelines. Manchester University Press.
- Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 2, Issue 2 , pp 131-135
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Law, University of Leicester, Leciester, LE1 7RH, UK