The communicative aspects of civil disobedience and lawful punishment
- Kimberley Brownlee
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A parallel may be drawn between the communicative aspect of civil disobedience and the communicative aspect of lawful punishment by the state. In punishing an offender, the state seeks to communicate both its condemnation of the crime committed and its desire for repentance and reformation on the part of the offender. Similarly, in civilly disobeying the law, a disobedient seeks to convey both her condemnation of a certain law or policy and her desire for recognition that a lasting change in policy is required. When disobedients and authorities target each other, their confrontation allows for a direct comparison of the respective justifiability of their conduct. Their confrontation is explored in this paper with an eye to analysing how civil disobedients and authorities should engage with each other.
- Ashworth, A., & von Hirsch, A. (2005). Proportionate sentencing: Exploring the principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Brownlee, K. (2004). Features of a paradigm case of civil disobedience. Res Publica, 10(4), 337–351. CrossRef
- Duff, A. (1998). Desert and penance. In A. Ashworth & A. von Hirsch (Eds.), Principled sentencing: Theory and policy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Duff, A. (2003). Punishment. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), Oxford handbook of practical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Duff, A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
- Feinberg, J. (1994). The expressive function of punishment. In A. Duff & D. Garland (Eds.), A reader on punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gardner, J. (2002). In defence of defences. Flores Juris et Legum: Festskrift till Nils Jareborg. Uppsala: Iustus Forlag. Retrieved 3 October 2003 from http://users.ox.ac.uk/∼lawf0081/biblio.htm.
- Gardner, J., & Macklem, T. (2002). Reasons. In J. Coleman & S. Shapiro (Eds.), Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Greenawalt, K. (1987). Conflicts of law and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mill, J. S. (1999). On liberty. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
- Potter, W. (2001). The new backlash: From the streets to the courthouse, the new activists find themselves under attack. Texas Observer, 14 September. Retrieved 10 October 2005 from http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=420.
- Raz, J. (1994). Ethics in the public domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law essays on law and morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Russell, B. (1998). Autobiography. London: Routledge.
- Scheffler, S. (2003). Distributive justice and economic desert. In S. Olsaretti (Ed.), Desert and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Soper, P. (2002). The ethics of deference: Learning from law’s morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tasioulas, J. (2003). Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(2), 101–132. CrossRef
- Tasioulas, J. (2006). Punishment and repentance. Philosophy, 81, 279–322. CrossRef
- von Hirsch, A. (1998). Proportionate sentences: A desert perspective. In A. Ashworth & A. von Hirsch (Eds.), Principled sentencing: Theory and policy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- The communicative aspects of civil disobedience and lawful punishment
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 1, Issue 2 , pp 179-192
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Civil disobedience
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Manchester, Dover St Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK