April 2013, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 155-158,
Open Access
This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date:
14 Aug 2012
A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials
- Ewout H. Meijer,
- Gershon Ben-Shakhar,
- Bruno Verschuere,
- Emanuel Donchin
- … show all 4 hide
Abstract
In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115–154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell’s review covered much of his own work employing his “brain fingerprinting” technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115–154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology.
- Ben-Shakhar, G, Elaad, E (2003) The validity of psychophysiological detection of deception with the guilty knowledge test: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 88: pp. 131-151 CrossRef
- Donchin, E (1981) Surprise!… surprise?. Psychophysiology 18: pp. 493-513 CrossRef
- Farwell, LA (1992) Two new twists on the truth detector: brain-wave detection of occupational information. Psychophysiology 29: pp. S3
- Farwell, LA (2008) Brain fingerprinting detects real crimes in the field despite one-hundred-thousand-dollar reward for beating it. Psychophysiology 45: pp. S1 CrossRef
- Farwell LA (2009). Brain fingerprinting in global security. Presented at the Global Security Challenge Security Summit, Nov 2009. London Business School, London
- Farwell, LA (2012) Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials. Cogn Neurodyn 6: pp. 115-154 CrossRef
- Farwell, LA, Donchin, E (1986) The “brain detector”: P300 in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology 23: pp. 434
- Farwell, LA, Donchin, E (1988) Event-related brain potentials in interrogative polygraphy: analysis using bootstrapping. Psychophysiology 25: pp. 445
- Farwell, LA, Donchin, E (1991) The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 28: pp. 531-547 CrossRef
- Farwell, LA, Richardson, DC (2006) Brain fingerprinting in laboratory conditions. Psychophysiology 43: pp. S37-S38
- Farwell, LA, Richardson, DC (2006) Brain fingerprinting in field conditions. Psychophysiology 43: pp. S38
- Farwell, LA, Smith, SS (2001) Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite efforts to conceal. J Forensic Sci 46: pp. 135-143
- Farwell, LA, Richardson, DC, Richardson, G (2011) Brain fingerprinting field studies comparing P300-MERMER and P300 ERPs in the detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology 48: pp. S95-S96
- Iacono, WG (2008) The forensic application of “brain fingerprinting:” why scientists should encourage the use of P300 memory detection methods. American Journal of Bioethics 8: pp. 30-32
- Lykken, DT (1959) The GSR in the detection of guilt. J Appl Psychol 43: pp. 385-388 CrossRef
- Lykken, DT (1960) The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: the effects of faking. J Appl Psychol 44: pp. 258-262 CrossRef
- Rosenfeld, JP (2005) “brain fingerprinting:” a critical analysis. Scient Rev Mental Health Pract 4: pp. 20-37
- Rosenfeld, JP P300 in detecting concealed information. In: Verschuere, B, Ben-Shakhar, G, Meijer, EH eds. (2011) Memory detection: theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Rosenfeld, JP, Cantwell, B, Nasman, VT, Wojdac, V, Ivanov, S, Mazzeri, L (1988) A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. Int J Neurosci 42: pp. 157-161 CrossRef
- Simmons, JP, Nelson, LD, Simonsohn, U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci 22: pp. 1359-1366 CrossRef
- Sutton, S, Braren, M, Zubin, J, John, ER (1965) Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150: pp. 1187-1188 CrossRef
- Verschuere, B, Ben-Shakhar, G, Meijer, EH eds. (2011) Memory detection: theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Title
- A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Journal
-
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Volume 7, Issue 2 , pp 155-158
- Cover Date
- 2013-04-01
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x
- Print ISSN
- 1871-4080
- Online ISSN
- 1871-4099
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Topics
- Keywords
-
- Concealed information test (CIT)
- Guilty knowledge test (GKT)
- Brain fingerprinting
- P300
- Authors
-
-
Ewout H. Meijer
(1)
(2)
- Gershon Ben-Shakhar (2)
- Bruno Verschuere (1) (3) (4)
- Emanuel Donchin (5)
-
Ewout H. Meijer
- Author Affiliations
-
- 1. Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- 3. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 4. Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- 5. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA