Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Issues in Cyborg Technology: Diversity and Inclusion

  • Critical Discussion Notes
  • Published:
NanoEthics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progress has reached the point where cyborg technology is leaving the sphere of mere science fiction. Whereas society as a whole formed a symbiosis with technology long ago, individuals are now starting to merge with technology as well. The effects can already be studied by looking at the examples of smartphones, computers and the Internet. The idea of ‘repairing’ humans, medical implants more sensitive than our natural, human faculties and even non-medical implants raise a lot of ethical questions, and require the concept of inclusion to be re-thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (2011): Cochlear Implants, NIH Publication No. 11–4798, updated March

  2. Clynes, Manfred E. and Kline, Nathan S. (1960)‘Cyborgs and Space’, Astronautics (September)

  3. Cf. Haraway, Donna: ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, in Haraway, Donna: Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge

  4. Zhiguang Zhu, Tsz Kin Tam, Fangfang Sun, Chun You, Zhang, Y.-H. Percival (2014): ‘A high-energy-density sugar biobattery based on a synthetic enzymatic pathway’, Nature Communications 5 http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140121/ncomms4026/full/ncomms4026.html#figures

  5. Galan F, Nuttin M, Lew E, Ferrez PW, Vanacker G, Philips J, Millan J, Del R (2008) ‘A brain-actuated wheelchair: asynchronous and non-invasive brain-computer interfaces for continuous control of robots’. Clin Neurophysiol 119:2159–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial Perspective’. Fem Stud 14(3):575–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillette, Felix (2004): ‘Racing tall: A Paralympian stands accused of getting an illegal leg up’, Slate, 10 November 2004

  8. http://stopthecyborgs.org/

  9. Cf. Ladd, Paddy: ‘Deaf culture’, Multilingual Matters, 2003

  10. Sturley, Nick (2010): ‘Eight Resolutions’, milan1880.com, http://milan1880.com/milan1880congress/eightresolutions.html

  11. Cf. Heffley, Holly: ‘Pediatric Cochlear Implants: Medical Miracle or Cultural Genocide?’, University of Kansas School of Nursing, http://archie.kumc.edu/bitstream/handle/2271/848/STT-JUNW_2010_Heffley_Pediatric-Cochlear-Implants.pdf?sequence=1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enno Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, E. Ethical Issues in Cyborg Technology: Diversity and Inclusion. Nanoethics 8, 303–306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0206-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0206-x

Keywords

Navigation