, 3:175

Dual-Use Research Codes of Conduct: Lessons from the Life Sciences

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0074-y

Cite this article as:
Selgelid, M.J. Nanoethics (2009) 3: 175. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0074-y


This paper considers multiple meanings of the expression ‘dual use’ and examines lessons to be learned from the life sciences when considering ethical and policy issues associated with the dual-use nature of nanotechnology (and converging technologies). After examining recent controversial dual-use experiments in the life sciences, it considers the potential roles and limitations of science codes of conduct for addressing concerns associated with dual-use science and technology. It concludes that, rather than being essentially associated with voluntary self-governance of the scientific community, codes of conduct should arguably be part of a broader regulatory oversight system.


EthicsNanoethicsDual useBiological weaponsChemical weaponsMousepoxPolioInfluenzaCodes of conductResponsibilityScience policyRegulation

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE)The Australian National UniversityCanberra ACTAustralia
  2. 2.World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for BioethicsThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.National Centre for BiosecurityThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia