Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). Inefficient redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95
Agrawala, S., & Andresen, S. (1999). Indispensability and indefensibility? The United States in the climate treaty negotiations. Global Governance, 5(4), 457–482.
Aidt, T. S. (1998). Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics, 69
Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies, 57
Austen-Smith, D. (1993). Information and influence: Lobbying for agendas and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 37
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1999). An economic theory of GATT. American Economic Review, 89
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2001). Domestic policies, national sovereignty, and international economic institutions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116
Bailey, M. A., Goldstein, J., & Weingast, B. (1997). The institutional roots of American trade policy: Politics, coalitions, and international trade. World Politics, 49
Barrett, S. (1999). A theory of full international cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11
Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baum, M. A., & Potter, P. B. K. (2008). The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science, 11
Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
Borzel, T. A. (2000). Why there is no ‘southern problem:’ On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Carrubba, C. J. (2005). Courts and compliance in international regulatory regimes. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 669–689.
Chapman, T. L. (2007). International security institutions, domestic politics, and institutional legitimacy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51
Clark, W. R. (2003). Capitalism, not globalism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Clark, W. R., & Hallerberg, M. (2000). Mobile capital, domestic institutions, and electorally induced monetary and fiscal policy. American Political Science Review, 94
Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dai, X. (2005). Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization, 59
Dai, X. (2006). The conditional nature of democratic compliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50
Davis, C. (2004). International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review, 98
DeSombre, E. R., & Barkin, J. S. (2002). Turtles and trade: The WTO’s acceptance of environmental trade restrictions. Global Environmental Politics, 2
Downs, G. W. (2000). Constructing effective environmental regimes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3
Downs, G. W., & Rocke, D. M. (1995). Optimal imperfection? Domestic uncertainty and institutions in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoon, P. N. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50
Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers
. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Fang, S. (2008). The informational role of international institutions and domestic politics. American Journal of Political Science, 52
Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52
Fernandez, R., & Portes, J. (1998). Returns to regionalism: An analysis of nontraditional gains from regional trade agreements. World Bank Economic Review, 12(2), 197–220.
Gilligan, M. J. (2004). Is there a broader-deeper trade-off in international multilateral agreements? International Organization, 58
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, 84(4), 833–850.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gruber, L. (2000). Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guisinger, A. (2009). Determining trade policy: Do voters hold politicians accountable? International Organization, 63
Haggard, S., & Maxfield, S. (1996). The political economy of financial internationalization in the developing world. International Organization, 50
Hug, S., & König, T. (2002). In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the Amsterdam intergovernmental conference. International Organization, 56
Jensen-Moran, J. (1996). Trade battles as investment wars: The coming rules of origin debate. Washington Quarterly, 19
Keeler, J. T. S. (1996). Agricultural power in the European community: Explaining the fate of CAP and GATT negotiations. Comparative Politics, 28
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55
Kucik, J., & Reinhardt, E. (2008). Does flexibility promote cooperation? An application to the global trade regime. International Organization, 62
Lohmann, S. (1998). An information rationale for the power of special interests. American Political Science Review, 92
Lohmann, S., & O’Halloran, S. (1994). Divided government and U.S. trade policy: Theory and evidence. International Organization, 48
Maggi, G., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1998). The value of trade agreements in the presence of political pressures. Journal of Political Economy, 106
Manger, M. S. (2009). Investing in protection: The politics of preferential trading agreements between North and South. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Science Review, 94
Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2006). Democratization and international organizations. International Organization, 60
Martin, L. L. (2000). Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international commitments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mattli, W., & Plümper, T. (2004). The internal value of external options: How the EU shapes the scope of regulatory reforms in transition countries. European Union Politics, 5
Mayer, W., & Mourmouras, A. (2008). IMF conditionality: An approach based on the theory of special interest politics. Review of International Organizations, 3
McGillivray, F., & Smith, A. (2006). Credibility in compliance and punishment: Leader specific punishments and credibility. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 248–258.
McGinnis, J. O., & Movsesian, M. L. (2000). The world trade constitution. Harvard Law Review, 114
Mertha, A., & Pahre, R. (2005). Patently misleading: Partial implementation and bargaining leverage in Sino-American negotiations on intellectual property rights. International Organization, 59
Milner, H. V. (1988). Resisting protectionism: Global industries and the politics of international trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, R. B. (1994). Regime design matters: Intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance. International Organization, 48
Mitra, D. (1999). Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: A long-run model of trade policy determination. American Economic Review, 89
Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5
Paarlberg, R. (1997). Agricultural policy reform and the uruguay round: Synergistic linkage in a two-level game? International Organization, 51
Pelc, K. J. (2009). Seeking escape: The use of escape clauses in international trade agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 53
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 44
Rosendorff, B. P. (2005). Stability and rigidity: Politics and design of the WTO’s dispute settlement procedure. American Political Science Review, 99
Smith, A. (2009). Political groups, leader change, and the pattern of international cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53
Smith, A., & Hayes, D. R. (1997). The shadow of the polls: Electoral effects on international agreements. International Interactions, 23
Snidal, D. (1996). Political economy and international institutions. International Review of Law and Economics, 16
Staiger, R. W., & Tabellini, G. (1999). Do GATT rules help governments make domestic commitments? Economics and Politics, 11
Stasavage, D. (2004). Open-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining. International Organization, 58
Stephan, P. B. (2000). International governance and American democracy. Chicago Journal of International Law, 1(2), 237–256.
Tarar, A. (2001). International bargaining with two-sided domestic constraints. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vaubel, R. (1986). A public choice approach to international organization. Public Choice, 51
Weingast, B. R., & Marshall, W. J. (1988). The industrial organization of Congress: Or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy, 96