Skip to main content
Log in

Ossicaulis lachnopus (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae), a species similar to O. lignatilis, is verified by morphological and molecular methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identity of Ossicaulis lachnopus and O. lignatilis was studied using both classical and molecular methods. While O. lignatilis is a well-known species, O. lachnopus is almost unknown, having been resurrected to modern mycology by M. Contu in 2000. Based on collections from six European countries, both classical and molecular methods independently proved that the species really represent two separate entities. They form two well-supported clades that correlate to morphologically separable groups. The most important distinguishing characters are the size of spores, especially their length, and a pileus colour. O. lachnopus has small spores and a grey or beige-grey tinged pileus, whereas O. lignatilis has larger spores and a whitish to cream pileus, with a slight beige-greyish tinge at most. In this paper, we discuss taxonomy, ecology and distribution of both species and propose a preliminary key for their identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC (eds) (1988) Flora agaricina neerlandica, vol. 1. A.A, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Baz J (2011) Ossicaulis lachnopus (Fr.) Contu 2000. http://www.micologia.net/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=152354. Accessed 14 December 2011

  • Breitenbach J, Kränzlin F (1991) Pilze der Schweiz, Band 3, Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze, 1. Teil. Verlag Mykologia, Luzern

    Google Scholar 

  • Contu M (2000) Funghi della Sardegna: note e descrizioni. III. Boll Assoc Micol Ecol Romana 15(48):3–15, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Contu M (2007) Funghi della Sardegna: note e descrizioni—VII. Micol Veget Medit 22(1):29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyssartier G, Roux P (2011) Le guide des champignons France et Europe. Belin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries E (1815) Observationes mycologicae, Pars 1. Bonnier, Kjøbenhavn

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries E (1821) Systema mycologicum, vol. 1. Ex Officina Berlingiana, Lund & Greifswald

  • Gardes M, Bruns D (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gröger F (2006) Bestimmungsschlüssel für Blätterpilze und Röhrlinge in Europa, Teil I. Regensb Mykol Schr 13:1–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS, Vilgalys R (1993) Phylogenetic relationships of Lentinus (Basidiomycotina) inferred from molecular and morphological characters. Syst Bot 18(3):409–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holec J, Kolařík M (2011) Tricholomopsis flammula (Basidiomycota, Agaricales)—molecular taxonomy, delimitation, variability and ecology. Mycol Prog 10:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. BMC Bioinforma 9:212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1981) Taschenlexikon der Farben. Muster-Schmidt Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieglsteiner GJ (ed) (2001) Die Großpilze Baden-Württembergs, Band 3, Ständerpilze: Blätterpilze I. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühner R, Romagnesi H (1953) Flore analytique des champignons supérieurs. Masson et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper TW (1995) Ossicaulis. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC (eds) Flora agaricina neerlandica, vol. 3. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 131–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange JE (1936) Flora agaricina Danica, vol 2. Society for the advancement of mycology in denmark and the Danish botanical society, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Legon NW, Henrici A (2005) Checklist of the British & Irish Basidiomycota. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig E (2000) Pilzkompendium, band 1. IHW Verlag, Abbildungen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig E (2001) Pilzkompendium, band 1, Beschreibungen. IHW Verlag, Eching

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, Ge ZW, Yang ZL, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ (2006) Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98(6):982–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moncalvo JM, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys R (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst Biol 49(2):278–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA et al (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:357–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell K (1993) Fusarium and its near relatives. In: Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (eds) The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 225–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoušek T (ed) (2004) Velký fotoatlas hub z jižních Čech [Large atlas of mushroom photographs from southern Bohemia]. T. Papoušek, České Budějovice

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R (1994) Mushrooms and other fungi of Great Britain & Europe. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer v1.4. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. Accessed May 2012

  • Redhead SA, Ginns JH (1985) A reappraisal of agaric genera associated with brown rots of wood. Trans Mycol Soc Jpn 26(3):349–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roux P (2006) Mille et un champignons. Édition Roux, Sainte-Sigolène

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryman S, Holmåsen I (1992) Pilze. Bernhard Thalacker Verlag, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th edn. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers B (2012) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York botanical garden’s virtual herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/. Accessed 15 April 2012

  • Vesterholt J (2008) Ossicaulis Redhead & Ginns. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J (eds) Funga Nordica. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, p 506

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wojewoda W (2003) Checklist of Polish larger Basidiomycota. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Kraków

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Marco Contu and Scott A. Redhead for help with literature, and Giovanni Robich for information on type specimens. J. Holec's work was financially supported by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (project MK00002327201). M. Kolařík was sponsored by the grant MSM 6007665801.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Holec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holec, J., Kolařík, M. Ossicaulis lachnopus (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae), a species similar to O. lignatilis, is verified by morphological and molecular methods. Mycol Progress 12, 589–597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0866-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0866-2

Keywords

Navigation