The comparison of paper- and web-based questionnaires in patients with hand and upper extremity illness
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Questionnaires are often used to quantify the subjective aspects of illness such as disability, coping strategies, or symptoms of depression. Most questionnaires were validated in a paper-based format, but direct entry into a computer is becoming commonplace. The aim of this study was to assess differences in outcome of questionnaires pertinent to hand and upper extremity illness when they were administered in a computer or paper format.
Ninety-nine patients completed both paper and web versions of the short forms of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; the Pain Catastrophizing Scale; the Short Health Anxiety Index (SHAI-6); the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale; and a pain scale and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire sequentially during a single visit. We alternated starting with the paper or the web version after every five patients.
The cohort consisted of 46 females and 53 males with a mean age of 49 years. There were significant differences in SHAI-6 and the pain scale, but not in the other measures. The intraclass correlation was high.
The use of these questionnaires in electronic format is valid provided that the small differences we observed are not important to the primary study question. In our opinion, for most studies, the advantages of using an electronic format outweigh the small additional variation that might be introduced in the measures in an electronic format.
- Athale N, Sturley A, Skoczen S, et al. A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:223–8.
- Basnov M, Kongsved SM, Bech P, et al. Reliability of short form-36 in an internet- and a pen-and-paper version. Inform Health Soc Care. 2009;34:53–8. CrossRef
- Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–46. CrossRef
- Carini RM, Hayek, J.C., Kuh, G.D., Kennedy, J.M., Ouimet, J.A. (2003) College student responses to web and paper surveys: does mode matter? Research in Higher Education 44.
- Davis RN. Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: comparison with traditional methods. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999;31:572–7. CrossRef
- Estlander AM, Vanharanta H, Moneta GB, et al. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine. 1994;19:941–7. Phila Pa 1976. CrossRef
- Fouladi RT, McCarthy CJ, Moller NP. Paper-and-pencil or online? Evaluating mode effects on measures of emotional functioning and attachment. Assessment. 2002;9:204–15. CrossRef
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81. CrossRef
- Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–8. CrossRef
- Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, et al. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9:e25. CrossRef
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13. CrossRef
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41:1284–92. CrossRef
- Lowe B, Kroenke K, Grafe K. Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). J Psychosom Res. 2005;58:163–71. CrossRef
- Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153–63. CrossRef
- Niekel MC, Lindenhovius AL, Watson JB, et al. Correlation of DASH and QuickDASH with measures of psychological distress. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1499–505. CrossRef
- Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D, et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e29. CrossRef
- Ryan JM, Corry JR, Attewell R, et al. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:19–26. CrossRef
- Salkovskis PM, Rimes KA, Warwick HM, et al. The Health Anxiety Inventory: development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychol Med. 2002;32:843–53. CrossRef
- Shervin N, Dorrwachter J, Bragdon CR, et al. Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:285–93. CrossRef
- Sullivan MPJ. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:525–32. CrossRef
- Vranceanu AM, Jupiter JB, Mudgal CS, et al. Predictors of pain intensity and disability after minor hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:956–60. CrossRef
- Vranceanu AM, Safren S, Zhao M, et al. Disability and psychologic distress in patients with nonspecific and specific arm pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2820–6. CrossRef
- Zuidgeest M, Hendriks M, Koopman L, et al. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e68. CrossRef
- The comparison of paper- and web-based questionnaires in patients with hand and upper extremity illness
Volume 8, Issue 2 , pp 210-214
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- 2. Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA