Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of a lead shielding device for reducing the radiation dose to tissues outside the primary beams during CT

  • Radiobiology And Safety
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was done to investigate the efficacy of a lead shield in protecting the tissues outside the primary beams, such as the breast and thyroid, by measurement of the entrance skin dose during CT of the brain, neck, abdomen, and lumbar spine.

Materials and methods

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. This study included 150 patients (male:female 25:125, age range 15–45 years). In females, brain, lumbar spine, and abdominal CT scans, pre-/post-contrast neck CT scans, and post-contrast liver dynamic CT scans were performed. In males, brain CT scans only were performed. Breast shielding was performed in all females, and thyroid shielding was conducted in patients with brain CT. During all CT studies, the left breast or left thyroid was shielded using a lead shield, and the contralateral side was left unshielded. Thus, each breast or thyroid measurement had its own control for the same demographic data. The efficacy of the shielding of both breasts and thyroids during CT was assessed.

Results

During brain, abdominal, lumbar, pre-/post-contrast neck, and post-contrast liver dynamic CT, 33.5, 26.0, 17.4, 26.5, and 16.2 % of the breast skin dose were reduced, respectively. During brain CT, the thyroid skin dose was reduced by 17.9 % (females) and 20.6 % (males). There were statistically significant differences in the skin doses of shielded organs (p < 0.05). Breast shielding during neck and liver dynamic CT was the most effective compared with breast or thyroid shielding during other CT scans.

Conclusions

We recommend breast shielding during neck and liver dynamic CT in young female patients to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annual Report of the National Health Insurance Corporation of Korea (2000)

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2013) Practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. Version 3. Accessed at www.nccn.org on 7 June 2013

  3. Davies L, Welch HG (2006) Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA 295:2164–2167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grimshaw JM, Brazzelli M, Astin M, For the Royal College of Radiology Working Party (2003) Making the best use of the department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors, 5th edn. Royal College of Radiologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Annual Report of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Natural Conservation and Nuclear Safety (2002) Available at http://www.bmu.de/files/parlamentsbericht02.pdf

  6. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA et al (2005) Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1228–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brnić Z, Vekić B, Hebrang A, Anić P (2003) Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head. Eur Radiol 13:2436–2440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopper KD, Neuman JD, King SH et al (2001) Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1194–1198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Catuzzo P, Aimonetto S, Fanelli G et al (2010) Dose reduction in multislice CT by means of bismuth shields: results of in vivo measurements and computed evaluation. Radiol Med 115:152–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N et al (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 47:27–40

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beaconsfield T, Nicholson R, Thornton A et al (1998) Would thyroid and breast shielding be beneficial in CT of the head? Eur Radiol 8:664–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yilmaz MH, Albayram S, Yaşar D et al (2007) Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:138–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fordham LA, Brown ED, Washburn D et al (1997) Efficacy and feasibility of breast shielding during abdominal fluoroscopic examinations. Acad Radiol 4:639–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker MS, Kelleher NM, Hoots JA et al (2008) Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results. Clin Radiol 63:278–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gunn ML, Kanal KM, Kolokythas O et al (2009) Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose? J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:987–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rowley KA, Hill SJ, Watkins RA et al (1987) An investigation into the levels of radiation exposure in diagnostic examinations involving fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 60:167–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tse V, Lising J, Khadra M et al (1999) Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy: should we be protecting our thyroids? Aust N Z J Surg 69:847–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen MD (2009) Pediatric CT radiation dose: how low can you go? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1292–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huda W (2006) Medical radiation dosimetry. RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: from invisible to visible-the science and practice of X-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization, pp 29–39

  22. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCollough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Land CE, Tokunaga M, Tokuaka S et al (1993) Early-onset breast cancer in A-bomb survivors. Lancet 342:237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu B, Goodsitt M, Chan HP (1995) Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography. Radiology 197:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a CMB-Yuhan research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2010 (6-2010-0141).

Conflict of interest

Jae-Joon Chung, Eun-Suk Cho, Sung Min Kang, Jeong-Sik Yu, Dae Jung Kim, and Joo Hee Kim declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Joon Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, JJ., Cho, ES., Kang, S.M. et al. Usefulness of a lead shielding device for reducing the radiation dose to tissues outside the primary beams during CT. Radiol med 119, 951–957 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0421-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0421-0

Keywords

Navigation