The Benefits & Drawbacks of Integrating Cloud Computing and Interactive Whiteboards in Teacher Preparation
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Twenty-first century technology has changed the way tools are used to support and enhance learning and instruction. Cloud computing and interactive white boards, make it possible for learners to interact, simulate, collaborate, and document learning experiences and real world problem-solving. This article discusses how various technologies (blogs, wikis, GoogleDocs, and interactive white boards) have been used at one private university in teacher preparation courses. Authors discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each tool for students and faculty and how technologies are made user-friendly for learners of different technology ability. Authors highlight tool usage and issues encountered by students and faculty and how the use of these tools can be useful for the students in their careers.
- Albion, P.R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 181–198. CrossRef
- Anderson, T. & Sturm, B. (2007). Cyberbullying: From playground to computer. Young Adult Library Services, 5(2), 24–27.
- Aricak, T., Slyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N. & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253–261. CrossRef
- Beeland, W.D. Jr (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? Retrieved from http://teach.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf
- Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. CrossRef
- Burden, K. (2002). Learning from the bottom up – the contribution of school based practice and research in the effective use of interactive whiteboards for the FE/HE sector. Retrieved from http://www.lsda.org.uk/ files/lsda/regions/8_Bio_KBurden.pdf
- Byrne, R. (2009). The effect of Web 2.0 on teaching and learning. Teacher Librarian, 37(2), 50–53.
- Caverly, D.C. & Ward, A. (2008). Techtalk: Wikis and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Developmental Education, 32(2), 36–37.
- Coutinho, C. (2007). Infusing technology in pre service teacher education programs in Portugal: an experience with Weblogs. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2527–2534). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Damcott, D., Landato, J., Marsh, C., & Rainey, W. (2000). Report on the use of the SMART Board interactive whiteboard in physical science. Retrieved from http://smarterkids.org/research/paper3.asp.
- Ellison, N. B. & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.
- Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., Wignall, E. (2003). Increasing preservice teachers’ capacity for technology integration through the use of electronic models. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95–112.
- Ertmer, P.A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Journal of Research on Technology in Education|,42(3), 255–284.
- Fernando, A. (2008). Baby steps in Web 2.0 education. Communication World, (March/April), 8–9.
- Foster, I.T., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., & Lu, S. (2009). Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. Computing Research Repository, 0901. Retrieved from http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~yongzh/pub/GCE08_Cloud_Grid.pdf
- Guo, R. X., Dobson, T., Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235–254. CrossRef
- Hemmi, A., Bayne, S. & Landt, R. (2008). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 19–30. CrossRef
- Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 283–301. CrossRef
- Holschuh, D.R. & Caverly, D.C. (2010). Techtalk: Cloud computing and developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education 33(3), 36–37.
- Hung-Ling, T. (2009). Effective wiki strategies to support high-context culture learners. TechTrends: Linking Researach& Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5), 16–22.
- Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54, 722–732. CrossRef
- Lenhart, A. & Fox, S. (2006). Bloggers: A portrait of the Internet's new storytellers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
- Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
- Levy, P. (2002). Interactive Whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Retrieved from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
- Nevin, R. (2009). Supporting 21st century learning through GoogleApps. Teacher Librarian, 37(2), 35–38.
- Norton, P. & Hathaway, D. (2008). On its way to K-12 classrooms, Web 2.0 goes to graduate school. Computers in Schools, 25(3), 163–180.
- Pace, D. & Blue, E.V. (2010). Cutting edge educators: Pre-service teachers’ use of technology within UDL instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 7(2), 19–29.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–10. CrossRef
- Ray, B. B. & Hocutt, M. M. (2006). Teachercreated, teacher-centered Weblogs: Perceptions and practices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 11–18.
- Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.
- Schroeder, B. (2009). Within the wiki: Best practices for educators. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 17(3), 181–197.
- Sharples, M., Graber, R., Harrison, C. Logan, K. (2009). E-safety and web 2.0 for children aged 11–16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 70–84. CrossRef
- Slay, H., Siebörger, I., Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just lipstick”? Computers & Education, 51, 1321–1341. CrossRef
- Straker, L., Pollock, C., Maslen, B. (2009). Principles for the wise use of computers by children. Ergonomics, 52(11), 1386–1401. CrossRef
- Taleb, R.S. & Butler, R.P. (2007). Shared electronic spaces in the classroom: Copyright, privacy, and guidelines. Techtrends 51(1), 12–15. CrossRef
- Thomas, D.A. & Qing, L. (2008). From Web 2.0 to Teacher 2.0. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 199–210. CrossRef
- Thompson, J. & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in Key Stage 2. Management in Education, 17, 29–33. CrossRef
- Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 851–867. CrossRef
- Wheeler, S. & Wheeler, D. (2009). Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 1–10. CrossRef
- The Benefits & Drawbacks of Integrating Cloud Computing and Interactive Whiteboards in Teacher Preparation
Volume 55, Issue 3 , pp 31-39
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- educational technology
- cloud computing
- interactive whiteboards
- pre-service teachers
- collaborative writing